Appropriate Use of Antibiotics in Acute Pancreatitis: A Scoping Review

Josep M. Badia, Sara Amador, Carmen González-Sánchez, Inés Rubio-Pérez, Alba Manuel-Vázquez, Montserrat Juvany, Estela Membrilla, José M. Balibrea, Xavier Guirao
{"title":"Appropriate Use of Antibiotics in Acute Pancreatitis: A Scoping Review","authors":"Josep M. Badia, Sara Amador, Carmen González-Sánchez, Inés Rubio-Pérez, Alba Manuel-Vázquez, Montserrat Juvany, Estela Membrilla, José M. Balibrea, Xavier Guirao","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics13090894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: While selective use of antibiotics for infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) in acute pancreatitis (AP) is recommended, studies indicate a high rate of inadequate treatment. Methods: A search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases was conducted, focusing on primary research and meta-analyses. Data were categorized based on core concepts, and a narrative synthesis was performed. Results: The search identified a total of 1016 publications. After evaluating 203 full texts and additional sources from the grey literature, 80 studies were included in the review. The answers obtained were: (1) Preventive treatment does not decrease the incidence of IPN or mortality. Given the risks of bacterial resistance and fungal infections, antibiotics should be reserved for highly suspected or confirmed IPN; (2) The diagnosis of IPN does not always require microbiological samples, as clinical suspicion or computed tomography signs can suffice. Early diagnosis and treatment may be improved by using biomarkers such as procalcitonin and novel microbiological methods; (3) When indicated, early initiation of antibiotics is a key determinant in reducing mortality associated with IPN; (4) Antibiotics with good penetration into pancreatic tissue covering Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria should be used. Routine antifungal therapy is not recommended; (5) The step-up approach, including antibiotics, is the standard for IPN management; (6) Antibiotic duration should be kept to a minimum and should be based on the quality of source control and patient condition. Conclusions: Early antibiotic therapy is essential for the treatment of IPN, but prophylactic antibiotics are not recommended in AP. High-quality randomized controlled trials are required to better understand the role of antibiotics and antifungals in AP management.","PeriodicalId":8151,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13090894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While selective use of antibiotics for infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) in acute pancreatitis (AP) is recommended, studies indicate a high rate of inadequate treatment. Methods: A search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases was conducted, focusing on primary research and meta-analyses. Data were categorized based on core concepts, and a narrative synthesis was performed. Results: The search identified a total of 1016 publications. After evaluating 203 full texts and additional sources from the grey literature, 80 studies were included in the review. The answers obtained were: (1) Preventive treatment does not decrease the incidence of IPN or mortality. Given the risks of bacterial resistance and fungal infections, antibiotics should be reserved for highly suspected or confirmed IPN; (2) The diagnosis of IPN does not always require microbiological samples, as clinical suspicion or computed tomography signs can suffice. Early diagnosis and treatment may be improved by using biomarkers such as procalcitonin and novel microbiological methods; (3) When indicated, early initiation of antibiotics is a key determinant in reducing mortality associated with IPN; (4) Antibiotics with good penetration into pancreatic tissue covering Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria should be used. Routine antifungal therapy is not recommended; (5) The step-up approach, including antibiotics, is the standard for IPN management; (6) Antibiotic duration should be kept to a minimum and should be based on the quality of source control and patient condition. Conclusions: Early antibiotic therapy is essential for the treatment of IPN, but prophylactic antibiotics are not recommended in AP. High-quality randomized controlled trials are required to better understand the role of antibiotics and antifungals in AP management.
急性胰腺炎中抗生素的合理使用:范围审查
背景:虽然建议有选择性地使用抗生素治疗急性胰腺炎(AP)中的感染性胰腺坏死(IPN),但研究表明治疗不当的比例很高。研究方法对 PubMed、Scopus 和 Cochrane 数据库进行了检索,重点关注原始研究和荟萃分析。根据核心概念对数据进行分类,并进行叙述性综合。结果搜索共发现 1016 篇出版物。在评估了 203 篇全文和来自灰色文献的其他资料后,80 项研究被纳入综述。得到的答案是(1) 预防性治疗并不能降低 IPN 的发病率或死亡率。考虑到细菌耐药性和真菌感染的风险,应将抗生素保留给高度怀疑或确诊的 IPN;(2)IPN 的诊断并不一定需要微生物样本,临床怀疑或计算机断层扫描体征就足够了。使用降钙素原等生物标记物和新型微生物学方法可改善早期诊断和治疗;(3) 在有指征的情况下,尽早使用抗生素是降低 IPN 相关死亡率的关键因素;(4) 应使用对胰腺组织有良好渗透性的抗生素,以覆盖革兰氏阴性菌和革兰氏阳性菌。不推荐常规抗真菌治疗;(5) 包括抗生素在内的阶梯疗法是 IPN 治疗的标准;(6) 应尽量缩短抗生素的使用时间,并应根据源头控制的质量和患者的病情而定。结论:早期抗生素治疗对治疗 IPN 至关重要,但不建议在 AP 中使用预防性抗生素。需要进行高质量的随机对照试验,以更好地了解抗生素和抗真菌药物在 AP 治疗中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信