Florian van Daalen, Lianne Ippel, Andre Dekker, Inigo Bermejo
{"title":"A Response to: A Note on \"Privacy Preserving n-Party Scalar Product Protocol\"","authors":"Florian van Daalen, Lianne Ippel, Andre Dekker, Inigo Bermejo","doi":"arxiv-2409.10057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We reply to the comments on our proposed privacy preserving n-party scalar\nproduct protocol made by Liu. In their comment Liu raised concerns regarding\nthe security and scalability of the $n$-party scalar product protocol. In this\nreply, we show that their concerns are unfounded and that the $n$-party scalar\nproduct protocol is safe for its intended purposes. Their concerns regarding\nthe security are based on a misunderstanding of the protocol. Additionally,\nwhile the scalability of the protocol puts limitations on its use, the protocol\nstill has numerous practical applications when applied in the correct\nscenarios. Specifically within vertically partitioned scenarios, which often\ninvolve few parties, the protocol remains practical. In this reply we clarify\nLiu's misunderstanding. Additionally, we explain why the protocols scaling is\nnot a practical problem in its intended application.","PeriodicalId":501332,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Cryptography and Security","volume":"212 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Cryptography and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.10057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We reply to the comments on our proposed privacy preserving n-party scalar
product protocol made by Liu. In their comment Liu raised concerns regarding
the security and scalability of the $n$-party scalar product protocol. In this
reply, we show that their concerns are unfounded and that the $n$-party scalar
product protocol is safe for its intended purposes. Their concerns regarding
the security are based on a misunderstanding of the protocol. Additionally,
while the scalability of the protocol puts limitations on its use, the protocol
still has numerous practical applications when applied in the correct
scenarios. Specifically within vertically partitioned scenarios, which often
involve few parties, the protocol remains practical. In this reply we clarify
Liu's misunderstanding. Additionally, we explain why the protocols scaling is
not a practical problem in its intended application.
我们对 Liu 就我们提出的保护隐私的 n 方标量乘积协议所做的评论进行了回复。Liu 在评论中对 $n$ 方标量乘法协议的安全性和可扩展性提出了担忧。在本回复中,我们将证明他们的担忧是没有根据的,$n$方标量乘积协议对于其预期目的是安全的。他们对安全性的担忧是基于对协议的误解。此外,虽然该协议的可扩展性对其使用造成了限制,但如果应用在正确的场景中,该协议仍有许多实际应用。特别是在垂直分区的情况下,通常只有很少几方参与,该协议仍然实用。在本答复中,我们将澄清刘博士的误解。此外,我们还解释了为什么协议的缩放在其预期应用中不是一个实际问题。