Comparative analysis of a remotely-controlled wetland paddy seeder and conventional drum seeder

Sujit Hensh, Hifjur Raheman, Ganesh Upadhyay, Soumen Bera
{"title":"Comparative analysis of a remotely-controlled wetland paddy seeder and conventional drum seeder","authors":"Sujit Hensh, Hifjur Raheman, Ganesh Upadhyay, Soumen Bera","doi":"10.1007/s12046-024-02604-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A remotely-controlled wetland paddy seeder (RCWPS) with a mechatronic seed-metering device was developed for precise sowing of pre-germinated paddy seeds in wet puddled field. The RCWPS, powered by a 180 W DC motor, utilized two lugged wheels for propulsion. Linear actuator-controlled dog clutch was connected with each wheel to discontinue the power supply while turning. The four-row seed metering unit comprised a seed metering plate with holes at 200 mm spacing, actuated by a solenoid. The diameter of the metering plate hole, operating speed, and speed of agitation were maintained at 11.18 mm, 0.84 km h<sup>−1</sup>, and 37 rpm, respectively. This comparative study assessed its performance and operational costs at 1/3<sup>rd</sup> and 2/3<sup>rd</sup> seed filling levels under puddled conditions, comparing it to a conventional drum seeder. At 2/3<sup>rd</sup> seed filling, RCWPS demonstrated 96% feed index quality, no multiple index, 4% missing index, 85.46% hill-distribution uniformity coefficient, and 72.45% seed dropping uniformity coefficient. Meanwhile, the values observed for drum seeder were 78.33%, 6.67%, 15%, 69.85%, and 60.94%, respectively. Similar results were observed at 1/3rd filling level. It showed better quality seed-dropping with RCWPS compared to the conventional drum seeder at all degrees of seed filling. The total cost for seeding per hectare of land with RCWPS and drum seeder were found to be 28.05 USD and 12.77 USD, respectively and the break-even point were found 0.54 ha year<sup>−1</sup> and 0.038 ha year<sup>−1</sup>, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":21498,"journal":{"name":"Sādhanā","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sādhanā","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-024-02604-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A remotely-controlled wetland paddy seeder (RCWPS) with a mechatronic seed-metering device was developed for precise sowing of pre-germinated paddy seeds in wet puddled field. The RCWPS, powered by a 180 W DC motor, utilized two lugged wheels for propulsion. Linear actuator-controlled dog clutch was connected with each wheel to discontinue the power supply while turning. The four-row seed metering unit comprised a seed metering plate with holes at 200 mm spacing, actuated by a solenoid. The diameter of the metering plate hole, operating speed, and speed of agitation were maintained at 11.18 mm, 0.84 km h−1, and 37 rpm, respectively. This comparative study assessed its performance and operational costs at 1/3rd and 2/3rd seed filling levels under puddled conditions, comparing it to a conventional drum seeder. At 2/3rd seed filling, RCWPS demonstrated 96% feed index quality, no multiple index, 4% missing index, 85.46% hill-distribution uniformity coefficient, and 72.45% seed dropping uniformity coefficient. Meanwhile, the values observed for drum seeder were 78.33%, 6.67%, 15%, 69.85%, and 60.94%, respectively. Similar results were observed at 1/3rd filling level. It showed better quality seed-dropping with RCWPS compared to the conventional drum seeder at all degrees of seed filling. The total cost for seeding per hectare of land with RCWPS and drum seeder were found to be 28.05 USD and 12.77 USD, respectively and the break-even point were found 0.54 ha year−1 and 0.038 ha year−1, respectively.

Abstract Image

遥控湿地水稻播种机与传统滚筒播种机的比较分析
开发了一种带有机电一体化种子计量装置的遥控湿地水稻播种机(RCWPS),用于在潮湿的水田中精确播种预发芽的水稻种子。RCWPS 由 180 瓦直流电机驱动,利用两个拖轮推进。每个轮子上都连接了由线性推杆控制的狗式离合器,以便在转动时切断电源。四行种子计量装置由一个种子计量板组成,计量板上的孔间距为 200 毫米,由电磁铁驱动。计量板孔的直径、运行速度和搅拌速度分别保持在 11.18 毫米、0.84 千米/小时和 37 转/分钟。这项比较研究评估了在水洼条件下,该设备在 1/3 和 2/3 充种量时的性能和运营成本,并将其与传统的滚筒播种机进行了比较。在 2/3 粒种子充填时,RCWPS 的进料指数质量为 96%,无多重指数,缺失指数为 4%,小丘分布均匀系数为 85.46%,种子掉落均匀系数为 72.45%。而滚筒播种机的数值分别为 78.33%、6.67%、15%、69.85% 和 60.94%。在 1/3 充实度水平上也观察到了类似的结果。与传统滚筒播种机相比,在所有充种程度下,使用 RCWPS 播种都能获得更好的播种质量。使用 RCWPS 和滚筒播种机播种每公顷土地的总成本分别为 28.05 美元和 12.77 美元,盈亏平衡点分别为 0.54 公顷/年和 0.038 公顷/年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信