Prospective clinical-radiological study of the survival and behavior of short implants.

Carlos M Cobo-Vázquez,Pedro Molinero-Mourelle,Marta Romeo-Rubio,Blanca Flora Guisado-Moya,Jaime Del Río-Highsmith,Juan López-Quiles
{"title":"Prospective clinical-radiological study of the survival and behavior of short implants.","authors":"Carlos M Cobo-Vázquez,Pedro Molinero-Mourelle,Marta Romeo-Rubio,Blanca Flora Guisado-Moya,Jaime Del Río-Highsmith,Juan López-Quiles","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.07.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"STATEMENT OF PROBLEM\r\nShort implants are a therapeutic alternative for edentulous patients with severe bone resorption. Differences in peri-implant bone loss and complications of short implants depending on the type of connection are unclear.\r\n\r\nPURPOSE\r\nThe main purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the survival rate after 2 years of the short implants in the Oxtein system (Proclinic). Secondary objectives were to compare implant survival, peri-implant bone loss, peri-implant mucosal status, and associated complications in internal hexagonal connection versus external hexagonal connection implants.\r\n\r\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\r\nA randomized clinical trial was carried out in 14 patients with a mean age of 62.7 ±8.5 years, with a total of 61 Oxtein L35 and L6 Proclinic implants being placed at the Faculty of Dentistry. A descriptive analysis, simple binary logistic regression model using generalized estimating equations. and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were carried out (α=.05).\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nImplant survival was 85.2% (52/61). Failure of all implants occurred before prosthetic loading; bleeding after probing occurred in 28 implants, being greater among external connection implants (57.6%) P=.025. The presence of plaque appeared in 36 of the implants, without statistically significant differences between external connection (72.8%) and internal connection (60.0%) (P>.05). A total of 28 implants had at least 2 mm of keratinized mucosa, without statistically significant differences between external connection (63.6%) and internal connection (35.0%) P=.200. A total of 8 complications (13.1%) were recorded, including connection fractures, screw fracture, framework fracture, and buccal fenestrations.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nShort implants are a therapeutic solution to more complex surgical techniques. However, as lower survival has been reported, the characteristics of the implants and operator experience are important factors for their success.","PeriodicalId":501672,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.07.038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Short implants are a therapeutic alternative for edentulous patients with severe bone resorption. Differences in peri-implant bone loss and complications of short implants depending on the type of connection are unclear. PURPOSE The main purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the survival rate after 2 years of the short implants in the Oxtein system (Proclinic). Secondary objectives were to compare implant survival, peri-implant bone loss, peri-implant mucosal status, and associated complications in internal hexagonal connection versus external hexagonal connection implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS A randomized clinical trial was carried out in 14 patients with a mean age of 62.7 ±8.5 years, with a total of 61 Oxtein L35 and L6 Proclinic implants being placed at the Faculty of Dentistry. A descriptive analysis, simple binary logistic regression model using generalized estimating equations. and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were carried out (α=.05). RESULTS Implant survival was 85.2% (52/61). Failure of all implants occurred before prosthetic loading; bleeding after probing occurred in 28 implants, being greater among external connection implants (57.6%) P=.025. The presence of plaque appeared in 36 of the implants, without statistically significant differences between external connection (72.8%) and internal connection (60.0%) (P>.05). A total of 28 implants had at least 2 mm of keratinized mucosa, without statistically significant differences between external connection (63.6%) and internal connection (35.0%) P=.200. A total of 8 complications (13.1%) were recorded, including connection fractures, screw fracture, framework fracture, and buccal fenestrations. CONCLUSIONS Short implants are a therapeutic solution to more complex surgical techniques. However, as lower survival has been reported, the characteristics of the implants and operator experience are important factors for their success.
对短植入物的存活率和行为进行前瞻性临床放射学研究。
问题陈述短种植体是骨吸收严重的无牙颌患者的一种治疗选择。这项临床研究的主要目的是评估 Oxtein 系统 (Proclinic) 中短种植体 2 年后的存活率。次要目的是比较内六角连接种植体与外六角连接种植体的种植体存活率、种植体周围骨质流失、种植体周围粘膜状况以及相关并发症。材料和方法在牙科学院的 14 位平均年龄为 62.7 ± 8.5 岁的患者中进行了随机临床试验,共植入了 61 个 Oxtein L35 和 L6 Proclinic 种植体。结果种植体存活率为 85.2%(52/61)。所有种植体的失败都发生在修复体植入之前;28 个种植体在探诊后出血,其中外连接种植体的出血量更大(57.6%),P=.025。有 36 个种植体出现牙菌斑,但外部连接种植体(72.8%)和内部连接种植体(60.0%)之间的差异无统计学意义(P>.05)。共有 28 个种植体有至少 2 毫米的角化粘膜,外部连接(63.6%)和内部连接(35.0%)之间的差异无统计学意义(P=.200)。共记录了 8 例并发症(13.1%),包括连接处骨折、螺钉断裂、框架断裂和颊侧瘘管。结论短小种植体是一种治疗方法,可以解决较为复杂的手术技术,但由于存活率较低,种植体的特性和操作者的经验是其成功的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信