{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of Inter-cluster Communications in Edge Computing","authors":"Marc Michalke, Iulisloi Zacarias, Admela Jukan","doi":"arxiv-2409.09278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Distributed applications based on micro-services in edge computing are\nbecoming increasingly popular due to the rapid evolution of mobile networks.\nWhile Kubernetes is the default framework when it comes to orchestrating and\nmanaging micro-service-based applications in mobile networks, the requirement\nto run applications between multiple sites at cloud and edge poses new\nchallenges. Since Kubernetes does not natively provide tools to abstract\ninter-cluster communications at the application level, inter-cluster\ncommunication in edge computing is becoming increasingly critical to the\napplication performance. In this paper, we evaluate for the first time the\nimpact of inter-cluster communication on edge computing performance by using\nthree prominent, open source inter-cluster communication projects and tools,\ni.e., Submariner, ClusterLink and Skupper. We develop a fully open-source\ntestbed that integrates these tools in a modular fashion, and experimentally\nbenchmark sample applications, including the ML class of applications, on their\nperformance running in the multi-cluster edge computing system under varying\nnetworking conditions. We experimentally analyze two classes of envisioned\nmobile applications, i.e., a) industrial automation, b) vehicle decision drive\nassist. Our results show that Submariner performs best out of the three tools\nin scenarios with small payloads, regardless of the underlying networking\nconditions or transmission direction between clusters. When sending larger data\nto a service, ClusterLink outperforms Submariner once the inter-node networking\nconditions deteriorate, which may be the case in highly mobile scenarios in\nedge computing. Finally, Skupper significantly outperforms others in a variety\nof scenarios with larger payloads.","PeriodicalId":501280,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Networking and Internet Architecture","volume":"195 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Networking and Internet Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.09278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Distributed applications based on micro-services in edge computing are
becoming increasingly popular due to the rapid evolution of mobile networks.
While Kubernetes is the default framework when it comes to orchestrating and
managing micro-service-based applications in mobile networks, the requirement
to run applications between multiple sites at cloud and edge poses new
challenges. Since Kubernetes does not natively provide tools to abstract
inter-cluster communications at the application level, inter-cluster
communication in edge computing is becoming increasingly critical to the
application performance. In this paper, we evaluate for the first time the
impact of inter-cluster communication on edge computing performance by using
three prominent, open source inter-cluster communication projects and tools,
i.e., Submariner, ClusterLink and Skupper. We develop a fully open-source
testbed that integrates these tools in a modular fashion, and experimentally
benchmark sample applications, including the ML class of applications, on their
performance running in the multi-cluster edge computing system under varying
networking conditions. We experimentally analyze two classes of envisioned
mobile applications, i.e., a) industrial automation, b) vehicle decision drive
assist. Our results show that Submariner performs best out of the three tools
in scenarios with small payloads, regardless of the underlying networking
conditions or transmission direction between clusters. When sending larger data
to a service, ClusterLink outperforms Submariner once the inter-node networking
conditions deteriorate, which may be the case in highly mobile scenarios in
edge computing. Finally, Skupper significantly outperforms others in a variety
of scenarios with larger payloads.