Combinatorial protection of cochlear hair cells: not too little but not too much

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Arwa Kurabi, Kwang Pak, Eun Jung Lee, Allen F. Ryan
{"title":"Combinatorial protection of cochlear hair cells: not too little but not too much","authors":"Arwa Kurabi, Kwang Pak, Eun Jung Lee, Allen F. Ryan","doi":"10.3389/fncel.2024.1458720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundA number of drugs are toxic to the cochlear sensory cells known as hair cells (HCs), resulting in hearing loss. Treatment with survival-promoting growth factors, antioxidants, and inhibitors of cell death pathways or proteinases have been shown to reduce HC damage in <jats:italic>in vivo</jats:italic> and/or <jats:italic>in vitro</jats:italic> animal models. Conversely, translation to humans has often been disappointing. This may be due to the complexity of intracellular damage processes. We hypothesized that combining treatments targeting different cellular processes would be more effective.MethodsUsing an <jats:italic>in vitro</jats:italic> model of gentamicin ototoxicity for murine cochlear hair cells, we screened all 56 possible combinations of inhibitors targeting five different cell damage mechanisms, plus the activator of one cell survival pathway, each of which have been shown to be singly effective in preventing HC loss in experimental studies. A high dose of gentamicin (200 μM) was used over three days in culture. All compounds were added at a dosage below that required for significant protection in the assay, and only this single dose was then employed. This was done so that we could more easily detect interactive, as opposed to additive, effects.ResultsIncreasing protection of hair cells was observed as combinations of compounds were increased from two to four factors, although not all combinations were equally protective. The optimal combination of four compounds consisted of an anti-oxidant, an apoptosis inhibitor, an autophagy inhibitor and a protective growth factor. Increasing the number of factors to five or six resulted in decreased protection.ConclusionThe results support the hypothesis that targeting multiple cellular damage or survival pathways provides more an effective hair cell protection approach. The results help to identify critical interactions among the cellular processes that operate in gentamicin ototoxicity. They also suggest that inhibiting too many biological processes impairs functions critical to HC survival, resulting in decreased protection.","PeriodicalId":12432,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2024.1458720","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundA number of drugs are toxic to the cochlear sensory cells known as hair cells (HCs), resulting in hearing loss. Treatment with survival-promoting growth factors, antioxidants, and inhibitors of cell death pathways or proteinases have been shown to reduce HC damage in in vivo and/or in vitro animal models. Conversely, translation to humans has often been disappointing. This may be due to the complexity of intracellular damage processes. We hypothesized that combining treatments targeting different cellular processes would be more effective.MethodsUsing an in vitro model of gentamicin ototoxicity for murine cochlear hair cells, we screened all 56 possible combinations of inhibitors targeting five different cell damage mechanisms, plus the activator of one cell survival pathway, each of which have been shown to be singly effective in preventing HC loss in experimental studies. A high dose of gentamicin (200 μM) was used over three days in culture. All compounds were added at a dosage below that required for significant protection in the assay, and only this single dose was then employed. This was done so that we could more easily detect interactive, as opposed to additive, effects.ResultsIncreasing protection of hair cells was observed as combinations of compounds were increased from two to four factors, although not all combinations were equally protective. The optimal combination of four compounds consisted of an anti-oxidant, an apoptosis inhibitor, an autophagy inhibitor and a protective growth factor. Increasing the number of factors to five or six resulted in decreased protection.ConclusionThe results support the hypothesis that targeting multiple cellular damage or survival pathways provides more an effective hair cell protection approach. The results help to identify critical interactions among the cellular processes that operate in gentamicin ototoxicity. They also suggest that inhibiting too many biological processes impairs functions critical to HC survival, resulting in decreased protection.
耳蜗毛细胞的组合保护:不能太少也不能太多
背景一些药物对耳蜗感觉细胞(即毛细胞)具有毒性,从而导致听力损失。在体内和/或体外动物模型中,使用促进存活的生长因子、抗氧化剂和细胞死亡途径抑制剂或蛋白酶治疗已被证明可减少耳蜗毛细胞的损伤。相反,将这些研究成果应用于人体却往往令人失望。这可能是由于细胞内损伤过程的复杂性。我们假设,将针对不同细胞过程的治疗方法结合在一起会更有效。方法利用小鼠耳蜗毛细胞的庆大霉素耳毒性体外模型,我们筛选了针对五种不同细胞损伤机制的抑制剂的所有 56 种可能的组合,以及一种细胞存活途径的激活剂。高剂量庆大霉素(200 μM)在培养过程中使用了三天。所有化合物的添加剂量都低于在试验中提供显著保护所需的剂量,因此只使用了这一单一剂量。这样做是为了让我们能更容易地检测出交互作用,而不是相加作用。结果当化合物的组合从两个因素增加到四个因素时,观察到对毛细胞的保护作用不断增强,尽管并非所有的组合都具有相同的保护作用。四种化合物的最佳组合包括一种抗氧化剂、一种细胞凋亡抑制剂、一种自噬抑制剂和一种保护性生长因子。结论:研究结果支持这样的假设,即针对多种细胞损伤或存活途径可提供更有效的毛细胞保护方法。这些结果有助于确定庆大霉素耳毒性作用的细胞过程之间的关键相互作用。这些结果还表明,抑制过多的生物过程会损害对毛细胞存活至关重要的功能,从而降低保护效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
3.80%
发文量
627
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the cellular mechanisms underlying cell function in the nervous system across all species. Specialty Chief Editors Egidio D‘Angelo at the University of Pavia and Christian Hansel at the University of Chicago are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信