Shira Houwenhuyse, Francois Massol, Emilie Macke, Luc De Meester, Isabel Vanoverberghe, Robby Stoks, Ellen Decaestecker
{"title":"How does co-occurrence of Daphnia species affect their gut microbiome?","authors":"Shira Houwenhuyse, Francois Massol, Emilie Macke, Luc De Meester, Isabel Vanoverberghe, Robby Stoks, Ellen Decaestecker","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.10.612237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Species co occurrence can lead to competitive interactions that influence fitness. Competition is typically assumed to be modulated by species niche, especially food acquisition related traits. The influence of interspecific interactions on host microbiome communities has rarely been considered, and yet may provide an alternative mechanism regarding the effect of host species co occurrence on their fitness. Here, we investigated whether the composition of the gut microbial community differs between two Daphnia species (D. magna and D. pulex), and whether the gut microbiome of one species depends on the presence of the other. We hypothesized the stronger filter feeder D. magna to have a larger effect on the gut microbiome of the weaker filter feeder D. pulex than vice versa. To this purpose, three D. magna and three D. pulex genotypes were first made axenic and then grown in monocultures or in cocultures in natural environmental bacterioplankton-enriched water, before assessing the community composition of the gut microbiomes and bacterioplankton. We found that the composition of the gut microbiome of the two Daphnia species did not significantly differ overall. However, subtle differences between mono- and cocultures were found at the Daphnia genotype level. For most genotype combinations (six out of nine), the microbiome of D. pulex changed more when grown in cocultures with D. magna than in monocultures. This provides limited support for our hypothesis that the stronger competitor has a larger effect on the gut microbiome of the weaker one than vice versa, and that this effect is possibly mediated via the bacterioplankton community.","PeriodicalId":501320,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Ecology","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.10.612237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Species co occurrence can lead to competitive interactions that influence fitness. Competition is typically assumed to be modulated by species niche, especially food acquisition related traits. The influence of interspecific interactions on host microbiome communities has rarely been considered, and yet may provide an alternative mechanism regarding the effect of host species co occurrence on their fitness. Here, we investigated whether the composition of the gut microbial community differs between two Daphnia species (D. magna and D. pulex), and whether the gut microbiome of one species depends on the presence of the other. We hypothesized the stronger filter feeder D. magna to have a larger effect on the gut microbiome of the weaker filter feeder D. pulex than vice versa. To this purpose, three D. magna and three D. pulex genotypes were first made axenic and then grown in monocultures or in cocultures in natural environmental bacterioplankton-enriched water, before assessing the community composition of the gut microbiomes and bacterioplankton. We found that the composition of the gut microbiome of the two Daphnia species did not significantly differ overall. However, subtle differences between mono- and cocultures were found at the Daphnia genotype level. For most genotype combinations (six out of nine), the microbiome of D. pulex changed more when grown in cocultures with D. magna than in monocultures. This provides limited support for our hypothesis that the stronger competitor has a larger effect on the gut microbiome of the weaker one than vice versa, and that this effect is possibly mediated via the bacterioplankton community.
物种共存会导致竞争性相互作用,从而影响适应性。竞争通常被认为受物种生态位的调节,特别是与食物获取相关的特征。种间相互作用对宿主微生物群落的影响很少被考虑,但这可能为宿主物种共存对其适应性的影响提供了另一种机制。在这里,我们研究了两个水蚤物种(D. magna 和 D. pulex)之间肠道微生物群落的组成是否不同,以及一个物种的肠道微生物群落是否取决于另一个物种的存在。我们假设,滤食性较强的大型水蚤对滤食性较弱的水蚤肠道微生物群落的影响比反之更大。为此,我们首先将三种大型裸颊裸鲤和三种小型裸颊裸鲤基因型制成轴突型,然后在富含浮游细菌的自然环境水中进行单培养或共培养,然后评估肠道微生物组和浮游细菌的群落组成。我们发现,两种水蚤的肠道微生物群组成总体上没有显著差异。不过,在水蚤基因型水平上,单培养物和共培养物之间存在细微差别。在大多数基因型组合中(九种中的六种),水蚤与大型蚤共培养时,其微生物组的变化比单一培养时更大。这为我们的假设提供了有限的支持,即较强的竞争者对较弱竞争者肠道微生物组的影响比反之更大,而且这种影响可能是通过浮游细菌群落介导的。