Cross-sectional analysis of healthcare worker mental health and utilisation of a digital mental health platform from 2020 to 2023

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Anish K Agarwal, Lauren Southwick, Arthur Pelullo, Haley J McCalpin, Rachel E Gonzales, David A Asch, Cecilia Livesey, Lisa Bellini, Rachel Kishton, Sarah Beck, Raina M Merchant
{"title":"Cross-sectional analysis of healthcare worker mental health and utilisation of a digital mental health platform from 2020 to 2023","authors":"Anish K Agarwal, Lauren Southwick, Arthur Pelullo, Haley J McCalpin, Rachel E Gonzales, David A Asch, Cecilia Livesey, Lisa Bellini, Rachel Kishton, Sarah Beck, Raina M Merchant","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Healthcare worker (HCW) anxiety and depression worsened during the pandemic, prompting the expansion of digital mental health platforms as potential solutions offering online assessments, access to resources and counselling. The use of these digital engagement tools may reflect tendencies and trends for the mental health needs of HCWs. Objectives This retrospective, cross-sectional study investigated the association between the use of an online mental health platform within a large academic health system and measures of that system’s COVID-19 burden during the first 3 years of the pandemic. Methods The study investigated the use of Cobalt, an online mental health platform, comprising deidentified mental health assessments and utilisation metrics. Cobalt, serves as an online mental health resource broadly available to health system employees, offering online evidence-based tools, coaching, therapy options and asynchronous content (podcasts, articles, videos and more). The analyses use validated mental health assessments (Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)) alongside publicly available COVID-19 data. Statistical analyses employed univariate linear regression with Stata SE Statistical Software. Results Between March 2020 and March 2023, 43 308 independent user sessions were created on Cobalt, a majority being anonymous sessions (72%, n=31 151). Mental health assessments, including PHQ-4, PHQ-9, GAD-7 and primary care-PTSD, totalled 9462 over the time period. Risk for self-harm was noted in 17.1% of PHQ-9 assessments. Additionally, 4418 appointments were scheduled with mental health counsellors and clinicians. No significant associations were identified between COVID-19 case burden and Cobalt utilisation or assessment scores. Conclusion Cobalt emerged as an important access point for assessing the collective mental health of the workforce, witnessing increased engagement over time. Notably, the study indicates the nuanced nature of HCW assessments of anxiety, depression and PTSD, with mental health scores reflecting moderate decreases in depression and anxiety but signalling potential increases in PTSD. Tailored resources are imperative, acknowledging varied mental health needs within the healthcare workforce. Ultimately, this investigation lays the groundwork for continued exploration of the impact and effectiveness of digital platforms in supporting HCW mental health. Data are available on reasonable request. Data are available on request with appropriate protocols and permissions.","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Healthcare worker (HCW) anxiety and depression worsened during the pandemic, prompting the expansion of digital mental health platforms as potential solutions offering online assessments, access to resources and counselling. The use of these digital engagement tools may reflect tendencies and trends for the mental health needs of HCWs. Objectives This retrospective, cross-sectional study investigated the association between the use of an online mental health platform within a large academic health system and measures of that system’s COVID-19 burden during the first 3 years of the pandemic. Methods The study investigated the use of Cobalt, an online mental health platform, comprising deidentified mental health assessments and utilisation metrics. Cobalt, serves as an online mental health resource broadly available to health system employees, offering online evidence-based tools, coaching, therapy options and asynchronous content (podcasts, articles, videos and more). The analyses use validated mental health assessments (Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)) alongside publicly available COVID-19 data. Statistical analyses employed univariate linear regression with Stata SE Statistical Software. Results Between March 2020 and March 2023, 43 308 independent user sessions were created on Cobalt, a majority being anonymous sessions (72%, n=31 151). Mental health assessments, including PHQ-4, PHQ-9, GAD-7 and primary care-PTSD, totalled 9462 over the time period. Risk for self-harm was noted in 17.1% of PHQ-9 assessments. Additionally, 4418 appointments were scheduled with mental health counsellors and clinicians. No significant associations were identified between COVID-19 case burden and Cobalt utilisation or assessment scores. Conclusion Cobalt emerged as an important access point for assessing the collective mental health of the workforce, witnessing increased engagement over time. Notably, the study indicates the nuanced nature of HCW assessments of anxiety, depression and PTSD, with mental health scores reflecting moderate decreases in depression and anxiety but signalling potential increases in PTSD. Tailored resources are imperative, acknowledging varied mental health needs within the healthcare workforce. Ultimately, this investigation lays the groundwork for continued exploration of the impact and effectiveness of digital platforms in supporting HCW mental health. Data are available on reasonable request. Data are available on request with appropriate protocols and permissions.
对 2020 至 2023 年医护人员心理健康和数字心理健康平台使用情况的横断面分析
背景 医护人员(HCW)的焦虑和抑郁在大流行病期间加剧,促使数字心理健康平台作为提供在线评估、获取资源和咨询的潜在解决方案得到扩展。这些数字参与工具的使用可能反映出医护人员心理健康需求的趋势。目的 本项回顾性横断面研究调查了在大流行的头 3 年中,一个大型学术医疗系统内在线心理健康平台的使用情况与该系统 COVID-19 负担衡量指标之间的关联。方法 该研究调查了在线心理健康平台 Cobalt 的使用情况,该平台包括去身份化的心理健康评估和使用指标。Cobalt 是一个在线心理健康资源,可供医疗系统员工广泛使用,提供在线循证工具、辅导、治疗方案和异步内容(播客、文章、视频等)。分析使用了经过验证的心理健康评估(广泛性焦虑症-7(GAD-7)、患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD))以及公开的 COVID-19 数据。统计分析采用 Stata SE 统计软件进行单变量线性回归。结果 2020 年 3 月至 2023 年 3 月期间,Cobalt 上共创建了 43 308 个独立用户会话,其中大部分为匿名会话(72%,n=31 151)。在此期间,包括PHQ-4、PHQ-9、GAD-7和初级保健-创伤后应激障碍在内的心理健康评估共计9462次。17.1%的PHQ-9评估指出了自残风险。此外,还安排了 4418 次与心理健康顾问和临床医生的预约。COVID-19病例负担与Cobalt利用率或评估得分之间未发现明显关联。结论 Cobalt 是评估员工集体心理健康的重要途径,随着时间的推移,参与度也在不断提高。值得注意的是,该研究表明,高危职业人群对焦虑、抑郁和创伤后应激障碍的评估存在细微差别,心理健康评分反映出抑郁和焦虑的适度下降,但却表明创伤后应激障碍有可能加剧。考虑到医护人员在心理健康方面的不同需求,有针对性地提供资源势在必行。最终,这项调查为继续探索数字平台在支持医护人员心理健康方面的影响和有效性奠定了基础。如有合理要求,可提供数据。如有要求,可在获得适当协议和许可的情况下提供数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信