Lean Six Sigma quality improvement approach to implement clinical practice guidelines for prescribing opiates for chronic pain in a primary care setting

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Smita Bakhai, Jawdat Mustafa, Meghan Cloutier, Farhana Islam, Gregory D Gudleski, Jessica L Reynolds
{"title":"Lean Six Sigma quality improvement approach to implement clinical practice guidelines for prescribing opiates for chronic pain in a primary care setting","authors":"Smita Bakhai, Jawdat Mustafa, Meghan Cloutier, Farhana Islam, Gregory D Gudleski, Jessica L Reynolds","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Implementing guidelines for chronic opioid management during a clinic merger posed significant challenges. Our aim was to increase the percentage of chronic pain evaluations and urine toxicology tests in patients on chronic opioid therapy from the baseline rate of less than 20% to 50% within 1 year at an academic, primary care clinic. Methods We applied the Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control (DMAIC) approach of Lean Six Sigma for this quality improvement (QI) project. The QI tools included the creation of stakeholder mapping, root cause analysis, process flow mapping and a driver diagram. Lack of patient and provider education emerged as a significant barrier. The outcome measures were percentage of chronic pain evaluations and urine drug toxicology with an increase in controlled substance agreement completion rates as our process measures. Major interventions included patient and provider education, leveraging health information technology, care coordination and implementing new clinic protocols. Data analysis was performed by monthly run charts. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise clinical variables, while χ2 analyses were employed to determine statistically significant differences between preintervention and postintervention measures. Results We observed an increase in completion rates of clinic visits for chronic pain, rising from 19.0% to 51.9% (p<0.001). During study period, we observed a steady increase in chronic pain evaluations with a median of 4.5. Urine toxicology completion rates increased from 19.9% to 65.8% (p<0.001) during the preintervention and postintervention periods. We observed variable changes in urine toxicology rates with a median of 5.19. Furthermore, we observed an increase in controlled substance agreement completion rates, increasing to 50% from the baseline rate of <10%. Conclusions Education to patients and providers, shared decision-making using a patient-centred approach, enhancement of health information technology and system-based interventions in clinic protocols and workflows contributed to the success of this QI project. The DMAIC approach may facilitate the implementation of practice guidelines for chronic opioid therapy and enhance providers’ opioid prescribing practices. Data are available upon reasonable request. Not applicable.","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Implementing guidelines for chronic opioid management during a clinic merger posed significant challenges. Our aim was to increase the percentage of chronic pain evaluations and urine toxicology tests in patients on chronic opioid therapy from the baseline rate of less than 20% to 50% within 1 year at an academic, primary care clinic. Methods We applied the Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control (DMAIC) approach of Lean Six Sigma for this quality improvement (QI) project. The QI tools included the creation of stakeholder mapping, root cause analysis, process flow mapping and a driver diagram. Lack of patient and provider education emerged as a significant barrier. The outcome measures were percentage of chronic pain evaluations and urine drug toxicology with an increase in controlled substance agreement completion rates as our process measures. Major interventions included patient and provider education, leveraging health information technology, care coordination and implementing new clinic protocols. Data analysis was performed by monthly run charts. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise clinical variables, while χ2 analyses were employed to determine statistically significant differences between preintervention and postintervention measures. Results We observed an increase in completion rates of clinic visits for chronic pain, rising from 19.0% to 51.9% (p<0.001). During study period, we observed a steady increase in chronic pain evaluations with a median of 4.5. Urine toxicology completion rates increased from 19.9% to 65.8% (p<0.001) during the preintervention and postintervention periods. We observed variable changes in urine toxicology rates with a median of 5.19. Furthermore, we observed an increase in controlled substance agreement completion rates, increasing to 50% from the baseline rate of <10%. Conclusions Education to patients and providers, shared decision-making using a patient-centred approach, enhancement of health information technology and system-based interventions in clinic protocols and workflows contributed to the success of this QI project. The DMAIC approach may facilitate the implementation of practice guidelines for chronic opioid therapy and enhance providers’ opioid prescribing practices. Data are available upon reasonable request. Not applicable.
采用精益六西格玛质量改进方法,在基层医疗机构实施阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛处方临床实践指南
背景在诊所合并期间实施慢性阿片类药物管理指南是一项重大挑战。我们的目标是在 1 年内将一家学术性初级保健诊所对长期接受阿片类药物治疗的患者进行慢性疼痛评估和尿液毒理学检测的比例从基线的不到 20% 提高到 50%。方法 我们在该质量改进(QI)项目中采用了精益六西格玛的定义、测量、分析、改进、控制(DMAIC)方法。质量改进工具包括绘制利益相关者图、根本原因分析、流程图和驱动图。缺乏对患者和医疗服务提供者的教育是一大障碍。结果衡量标准是慢性疼痛评估和尿液药物毒理学的百分比,以及受控物质协议完成率的提高,作为我们的流程衡量标准。主要干预措施包括患者和医疗服务提供者教育、利用医疗信息技术、护理协调和实施新的诊所协议。数据分析通过月度运行图进行。描述性统计用于总结临床变量,χ2 分析用于确定干预前和干预后措施之间的显著差异。结果 我们观察到慢性疼痛患者的就诊完成率有所提高,从 19.0% 提高到 51.9%(p<0.001)。在研究期间,我们观察到慢性疼痛评估稳步增长,中位数为 4.5。在干预前和干预后,尿液毒理学检查完成率从 19.9% 增加到 65.8%(p<0.001)。我们观察到尿液毒理学检查率的变化不一,中位数为 5.19。此外,我们还观察到受控物质协议完成率有所提高,从基线的<10%提高到了50%。结论 对患者和医疗服务提供者进行教育、采用以患者为中心的方法共同决策、加强医疗信息技术以及在诊所协议和工作流程中采取基于系统的干预措施,这些都是该 QI 项目取得成功的原因。DMAIC 方法可促进慢性阿片类药物治疗实践指南的实施,并改善医疗服务提供者的阿片类药物处方实践。如有合理要求,可提供相关数据。不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信