Characteristics of Medical Quality in Tertiary Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospitals by TOPSIS and RSR Methods

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lijiao Ma, Yuanyuan Li, Jianlan Xue, Lin Xu, Xianwen Li, Xuhong Chang
{"title":"Characteristics of Medical Quality in Tertiary Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospitals by TOPSIS and RSR Methods","authors":"Lijiao Ma, Yuanyuan Li, Jianlan Xue, Lin Xu, Xianwen Li, Xuhong Chang","doi":"10.1177/00469580241275324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Performance evaluation is important for improving medical quality and services. But, there is a lack of research for medical quality in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) hospitals. This study examines the medical quality and various indicators of tertiary public traditional Chinese medicine hospitals in Gansu Province, to establish a foundation for improving the medical and management standards of these hospitals. This study collected performance assessment data from 10 tertiary TCM hospitals in Gansu Province from 2019 to 2022. Thirteen indicators with TCM characteristics were selected and categorized into 3 aspects: control of medical costs, internal operational dimensions, and comprehensive management. The level of medical quality in different hospitals and in different years were determined using the TOPSIS method for ranking and the RSR method for grading. Firstly, in terms of TCM characteristic indicators, hospital H had the highest control of medical costs and comprehensive management among different hospitals, with 45.87% and 24.20% respectively. The highest values for control of medical costs and comprehensive management were observed in 2020, with 40.65% and 18.69% respectively among different years. When evaluating the medical quality of different hospitals using the TOPSIS method, it was found that hospital H had the highest ranking from 2020 to 2022, with C<jats:sub>i</jats:sub> values of 0.725, 0.778, and 0.667 respectively. Additionally, the RSR method indicated that hospital H had a high level of grading from 2020 to 2022, with P<jats:sub>i</jats:sub> values of 0.687, 0.690, and 0.723 respectively. These findings suggest that the medical quality of hospital H is at a high and stable level of development. Based on the TOPSIS method to evaluate the performance appraisal results and ranking of different hospitals from 2019 to 2022. The results showed that the highest ranking was hospital B(C<jats:sub>i</jats:sub> = 0.913) in 2019. The highest ranking was hospital C(C<jats:sub>i</jats:sub> = 0.809)in 2020. The highest ranking was hospital D(C<jats:sub>i</jats:sub> = 0.689) in 2021. The highest ranking was hospital J(C<jats:sub>i</jats:sub> = 0.865) in 2022. The RSR method indicated that high grading level were hospitals B(P<jats:sub>i</jats:sub> = 0.899),F(P<jats:sub>i</jats:sub> = 0.795) in 2019. The highest grading level was hospital C(P<jats:sub>i</jats:sub> = 0.809) in 2020. The highest grading level were hospitals A(P<jats:sub>i</jats:sub> = 0.868), D(P<jats:sub>i</jats:sub> = 0.813), E(P<jats:sub>i</jats:sub> = 0.689), G(P<jats:sub>i</jats:sub> = 0.873), J(P<jats:sub>i</jats:sub> = 0.813), K(P<jats:sub>i</jats:sub> = 0.842) in 2022. Based on the above results indicate that there is a large variation in the medical quality profile of different hospitals from 2019 to 2022. By comparing the results of TOPSIS and RSR method from 2019 to 2022, we found that the hospitals with identical ranking were D and J, and the hospitals with ≤2 difference in ranking was A,B,C,E in 2019, the hospitals with &gt;2 ranking was A, F in 2020, the hospitals with &gt;2 ranking were C, G in 2021, and the hospitals with identical ranking results were B,D,E,G,J in 2022. Comparing the ranking results of TOPSIS and RSR methods, showed that the hospitals with identical rankings were B, F from 2019 to 2022. The difference in ranking results ≤2 were A, C, D, E, G, H, J, K, indicating that high consistency between TOPSIS and RSR methods and credible results. The findings reveal significant fluctuations in medical quality across different years, while the overall level of medical quality remains relatively stable among the various hospitals. It is recommended that TCM hospitals focus on improving management efficiency, optimizing hospital operations, enhancing the utilization of medical resources, and fostering the efficient development of hospitals.","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580241275324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Performance evaluation is important for improving medical quality and services. But, there is a lack of research for medical quality in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) hospitals. This study examines the medical quality and various indicators of tertiary public traditional Chinese medicine hospitals in Gansu Province, to establish a foundation for improving the medical and management standards of these hospitals. This study collected performance assessment data from 10 tertiary TCM hospitals in Gansu Province from 2019 to 2022. Thirteen indicators with TCM characteristics were selected and categorized into 3 aspects: control of medical costs, internal operational dimensions, and comprehensive management. The level of medical quality in different hospitals and in different years were determined using the TOPSIS method for ranking and the RSR method for grading. Firstly, in terms of TCM characteristic indicators, hospital H had the highest control of medical costs and comprehensive management among different hospitals, with 45.87% and 24.20% respectively. The highest values for control of medical costs and comprehensive management were observed in 2020, with 40.65% and 18.69% respectively among different years. When evaluating the medical quality of different hospitals using the TOPSIS method, it was found that hospital H had the highest ranking from 2020 to 2022, with Ci values of 0.725, 0.778, and 0.667 respectively. Additionally, the RSR method indicated that hospital H had a high level of grading from 2020 to 2022, with Pi values of 0.687, 0.690, and 0.723 respectively. These findings suggest that the medical quality of hospital H is at a high and stable level of development. Based on the TOPSIS method to evaluate the performance appraisal results and ranking of different hospitals from 2019 to 2022. The results showed that the highest ranking was hospital B(Ci = 0.913) in 2019. The highest ranking was hospital C(Ci = 0.809)in 2020. The highest ranking was hospital D(Ci = 0.689) in 2021. The highest ranking was hospital J(Ci = 0.865) in 2022. The RSR method indicated that high grading level were hospitals B(Pi = 0.899),F(Pi = 0.795) in 2019. The highest grading level was hospital C(Pi = 0.809) in 2020. The highest grading level were hospitals A(Pi = 0.868), D(Pi = 0.813), E(Pi = 0.689), G(Pi = 0.873), J(Pi = 0.813), K(Pi = 0.842) in 2022. Based on the above results indicate that there is a large variation in the medical quality profile of different hospitals from 2019 to 2022. By comparing the results of TOPSIS and RSR method from 2019 to 2022, we found that the hospitals with identical ranking were D and J, and the hospitals with ≤2 difference in ranking was A,B,C,E in 2019, the hospitals with >2 ranking was A, F in 2020, the hospitals with >2 ranking were C, G in 2021, and the hospitals with identical ranking results were B,D,E,G,J in 2022. Comparing the ranking results of TOPSIS and RSR methods, showed that the hospitals with identical rankings were B, F from 2019 to 2022. The difference in ranking results ≤2 were A, C, D, E, G, H, J, K, indicating that high consistency between TOPSIS and RSR methods and credible results. The findings reveal significant fluctuations in medical quality across different years, while the overall level of medical quality remains relatively stable among the various hospitals. It is recommended that TCM hospitals focus on improving management efficiency, optimizing hospital operations, enhancing the utilization of medical resources, and fostering the efficient development of hospitals.
用TOPSIS法和RSR法分析三级中医医院的医疗质量特点
绩效评估对于提高医疗质量和服务非常重要。但目前对中医医院医疗质量的研究还比较缺乏。本研究考察了甘肃省三级公立中医医院的医疗质量和各项指标,为提高这些医院的医疗和管理水平奠定基础。本研究收集了甘肃省 10 家三级中医医院 2019 年至 2022 年的绩效考核数据。选取了13项具有中医特色的指标,分为医疗费用控制、内部运行维度、综合管理3个方面。采用TOPSIS法排序和RSR法分级确定不同医院、不同年份的医疗质量水平。首先,在中医特色指标方面,H 医院的医疗费用控制和综合管理水平在不同医院中最高,分别为 45.87%和 24.20%。医疗费用控制和综合管理的最高值出现在 2020 年,在不同年份中分别为 40.65%和 18.69%。在使用 TOPSIS 方法评价不同医院的医疗质量时,发现 H 医院在 2020 年至 2022 年的排名最高,Ci 值分别为 0.725、0.778 和 0.667。此外,RSR 方法表明,2020 年至 2022 年,H 医院的分级水平较高,Pi 值分别为 0.687、0.690 和 0.723。这些结果表明,H 医院的医疗质量处于较高且稳定的发展水平。基于 TOPSIS 法评价 2019 年至 2022 年不同医院绩效考核结果及排名。结果显示,2019 年排名最高的是医院 B(Ci = 0.913)。排名最高的是 2020 年的 C 医院(Ci = 0.809)。排名最高的是 2021 年的 D 医院(Ci = 0.689)。排名最高的是 2022 年的 J 医院(Ci = 0.865)。RSR 方法显示,2019 年分级水平较高的是医院 B(Pi = 0.899)、F(Pi = 0.795)。分级水平最高的是 2020 年的 C 医院(Pi = 0.809)。分级水平最高的是 2022 年的医院 A(Pi=0.868)、D(Pi=0.813)、E(Pi=0.689)、G(Pi=0.873)、J(Pi=0.813)、K(Pi=0.842)。根据上述结果表明,从 2019 年到 2022 年,不同医院的医疗质量状况存在较大差异。通过比较2019~2022年TOPSIS法和RSR法的排序结果,发现2019年排序相同的医院为D、J,排序相差≤2的医院为A、B、C、E,2020年排序>2的医院为A、F,2021年排序>2的医院为C、G,2022年排序结果相同的医院为B、D、E、G、J。对比TOPSIS法和RSR法的排名结果,发现2019年至2022年排名相同的医院分别为B、F。排名结果相差≤2的医院有A、C、D、E、G、H、J、K,说明TOPSIS和RSR方法的一致性较高,结果可信。研究结果表明,不同年份的医疗质量波动较大,而不同医院的医疗质量总体水平相对稳定。建议中医医院注重提高管理效率,优化医院运营,提高医疗资源利用率,促进医院高效发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: INQUIRY is a peer-reviewed open access journal whose msision is to to improve health by sharing research spanning health care, including public health, health services, and health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信