Respiratory depression following epidural morphine: a clinical study.

A N Sandler, P Chovaz, W Whiting
{"title":"Respiratory depression following epidural morphine: a clinical study.","authors":"A N Sandler,&nbsp;P Chovaz,&nbsp;W Whiting","doi":"10.1007/BF03014258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thirteen post-thoracotomy patients were entered into a double-blind, randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of epidural morphine (Group E) and intravenous morphine (Group I) on postoperative respiratory depression. Postoperative respiratory depression was assessed for 24 hours by (a) PaCO2 at 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours (b) hourly assessment of respiratory rate (RR) (c) presence of respiratory rate of less than ten breaths per min for greater than 5 min (SRR) (d) hypopnoea/apnoea (H/A). RR, SRR, and H/A were measured using respiratory inductive plethysmography. PaCO2 was significantly elevated at 2, 6 and 12 hours in Group E and only at two hours in Group I. One of five patients in Group I had a single episode of SRR whereas five of eight patients in Group E had multiple episodes of SRR. None of the patients in Group I had H/A episodes, in contrast to six of eight in Group E who had numerous H/A episodes post-operatively. This difference was statistically significant. Multiple doses of epidural morphine produce an insidious and unpredictable change in respiratory pattern. Electronic monitoring is useful to assess those at risk of overdose and possible respiratory arrest.</p>","PeriodicalId":9371,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal","volume":"33 5","pages":"542-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03014258","citationCount":"40","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03014258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

Abstract

Thirteen post-thoracotomy patients were entered into a double-blind, randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of epidural morphine (Group E) and intravenous morphine (Group I) on postoperative respiratory depression. Postoperative respiratory depression was assessed for 24 hours by (a) PaCO2 at 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours (b) hourly assessment of respiratory rate (RR) (c) presence of respiratory rate of less than ten breaths per min for greater than 5 min (SRR) (d) hypopnoea/apnoea (H/A). RR, SRR, and H/A were measured using respiratory inductive plethysmography. PaCO2 was significantly elevated at 2, 6 and 12 hours in Group E and only at two hours in Group I. One of five patients in Group I had a single episode of SRR whereas five of eight patients in Group E had multiple episodes of SRR. None of the patients in Group I had H/A episodes, in contrast to six of eight in Group E who had numerous H/A episodes post-operatively. This difference was statistically significant. Multiple doses of epidural morphine produce an insidious and unpredictable change in respiratory pattern. Electronic monitoring is useful to assess those at risk of overdose and possible respiratory arrest.

硬膜外吗啡后呼吸抑制的临床研究。
将13例开胸术后患者纳入双盲随机临床试验,比较硬膜外吗啡(E组)和静脉吗啡(I组)对术后呼吸抑制的影响。术后24小时呼吸抑制通过(a) 2、6、12和24小时PaCO2评估(b)每小时呼吸频率评估(RR) (c)呼吸频率小于每分钟10次且大于5分钟(SRR) (d)低呼吸/呼吸暂停(H/ a)评估。RR、SRR和H/A采用呼吸诱导容积描记仪测量。在第2、6和12小时,E组PaCO2显著升高,而在第1组PaCO2仅在第2小时升高。第1组5例患者中有1例出现单次SRR发作,而E组8例患者中有5例出现多次SRR发作。I组没有患者出现H/A发作,而E组8例患者中有6例术后出现多次H/A发作。这一差异具有统计学意义。多剂量的硬膜外吗啡会对呼吸模式产生潜在的、不可预测的改变。电子监测是有用的,以评估那些有过量和可能的呼吸停止的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信