Quinoline synergy and reduced use: a study of pharmacodynamic interactions

Zahra Sadouki, Emmanuel Q Wey, Timothy D McHugh, Frank Kloprogge
{"title":"Quinoline synergy and reduced use: a study of pharmacodynamic interactions","authors":"Zahra Sadouki, Emmanuel Q Wey, Timothy D McHugh, Frank Kloprogge","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.13.612836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Meropenem, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin have been used as empiric broad-spectrum combination therapy in different combinations. Recent restrictions on the use of quinolones jeopardises the rational of administering this combination to increase the spectrum of coverage for this particular case. A mechanistic understanding of pharmacodynamic interaction for these combinations is lacking but can provide insight in the necessity of using the different moieties. Objectives: To study pharmacodynamic drug-drug interaction between meropenem, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin against Escherichia coli.\nMethods: Static time kill curve experiments were conducted with Escherichia coli (NCTC 12241) at 0.25 - 16 x MIC for a duration of 24 hours with samples being collected at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hour. Meropenem, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin were tested alone, in two- and three-way combinations. Bacterial load time series data were enumerated on Meuller Hinton plates and Colony Forming Unit data was modelled using nonlinear mixed-effects models in nlmixr.\nResults: Meropenem, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin two- and three-way combinations prevented regrowth, but did not when these moieties were studied alone. Gentamicin and meropenem were synergistic by decreasing ciprofloxacin IC50 and the combination effects of meropenem and gentamicin and the addition of meropenem on top of a gentamicin and ciprofloxacin combination were indifferent. Conclusions: Our findings emphasize the added value of a quinolone in the drug combination. In light of the recent move towards reduced use of quinolones, a quinolone free combination still prevented regrowth, it just did not display further synergy on IC50 and was indifferent in initial killing.","PeriodicalId":501518,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Pharmacology and Toxicology","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Pharmacology and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.13.612836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Meropenem, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin have been used as empiric broad-spectrum combination therapy in different combinations. Recent restrictions on the use of quinolones jeopardises the rational of administering this combination to increase the spectrum of coverage for this particular case. A mechanistic understanding of pharmacodynamic interaction for these combinations is lacking but can provide insight in the necessity of using the different moieties. Objectives: To study pharmacodynamic drug-drug interaction between meropenem, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin against Escherichia coli. Methods: Static time kill curve experiments were conducted with Escherichia coli (NCTC 12241) at 0.25 - 16 x MIC for a duration of 24 hours with samples being collected at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hour. Meropenem, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin were tested alone, in two- and three-way combinations. Bacterial load time series data were enumerated on Meuller Hinton plates and Colony Forming Unit data was modelled using nonlinear mixed-effects models in nlmixr. Results: Meropenem, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin two- and three-way combinations prevented regrowth, but did not when these moieties were studied alone. Gentamicin and meropenem were synergistic by decreasing ciprofloxacin IC50 and the combination effects of meropenem and gentamicin and the addition of meropenem on top of a gentamicin and ciprofloxacin combination were indifferent. Conclusions: Our findings emphasize the added value of a quinolone in the drug combination. In light of the recent move towards reduced use of quinolones, a quinolone free combination still prevented regrowth, it just did not display further synergy on IC50 and was indifferent in initial killing.
喹啉的协同作用和减少使用:药效学相互作用研究
背景:美罗培南、庆大霉素和环丙沙星曾以不同的组合作为经验性广谱联合疗法。最近对使用喹诺酮类药物的限制损害了使用这种联合疗法的合理性,以增加对这种特殊病例的治疗范围。目前还缺乏对这些联合用药的药效学相互作用机理的了解,但可以帮助我们深入了解使用不同药物的必要性。研究目的研究美罗培南、庆大霉素和环丙沙星对大肠埃希菌的药效学相互作用:方法:以大肠埃希菌(NCTC 12241)为研究对象,在 0.25 - 16 x MIC 的条件下进行静态时间杀灭曲线实验,持续 24 小时,分别在 0、2、4、6、8 和 24 小时采集样本。对美罗培南、庆大霉素和环丙沙星进行了单独、二联和三联测试。在 Meuller Hinton 菌落总数计数板上对细菌负载时间序列数据进行计数,并使用 nlmixr 中的非线性混合效应模型对菌落形成单位数据进行建模:结果:美罗培南、庆大霉素和环丙沙星的双向和三向组合能防止细菌再生,但单独使用这些药物时则不能。庆大霉素和美罗培南具有协同作用,可降低环丙沙星的 IC50,而美罗培南和庆大霉素的联合作用以及在庆大霉素和环丙沙星联合作用的基础上添加美罗培南的作用则不明显。结论我们的研究结果强调了喹诺酮类药物在联合用药中的附加价值。鉴于最近喹诺酮类药物的使用越来越少,不含喹诺酮类药物的复方制剂仍能防止细菌再生,只是在 IC50 上没有显示出进一步的协同作用,而且在初始杀灭效果上也无动于衷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信