{"title":"Effectiveness of Serious Games in Evaluating Cognitive Status of the Elderly: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Farveh Sabermahani,Mostafa Almasi-Dooghaee,Abbas Sheikhtaheri","doi":"10.1089/g4h.2023.0106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Early diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) is very important in better management of these diseases, and serious games play an effective role in helping to diagnose these diseases more accurately owing to their innovative features. With respect to the diversity of available games, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of using serious games to assess the cognitive status of the elderly at risk of MCI/AD. A systematic review was conducted and the correlation of serious game results with cognitive test scores were extracted from eligible studies for meta-analysis. We analyzed the correlation between the results of serious games with the scores of mini-mental state examination (MMSE), Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-revised edition (ACE-R), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) tests to evaluate cognitive status of the elderly at risk of MCI/AD, as well as the cognitive aspects examined by these tests. The random-effects model was used to obtain the overall correlation coefficient to assess the relationship between the results of serious games and the above mentioned paper-and-pencil tests. The correlation of game results with the MMSE, ACE-R, and MoCA was 0.604, 0.682, with 0.682, respectively. The correlation between the results of the games with the score of each cognitive aspect was also calculated. Overall, there is a positive correlation between serious game scores in terms of accurate patients' reactions with the scores of MMSE, ACE-R, and MoCA tests. Among the cognitive aspects, the highest correlation was obtained for fluency (0.591). For abstraction, however, the correlation was the lowest (0.036). In all three tests, the correlation was >0.6 and in cognitive aspects was <0.6. Thus, more studies should be conducted to develop serious games that are more in line with cognitive tests.","PeriodicalId":47401,"journal":{"name":"Games for Health Journal","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Games for Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2023.0106","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Early diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) is very important in better management of these diseases, and serious games play an effective role in helping to diagnose these diseases more accurately owing to their innovative features. With respect to the diversity of available games, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of using serious games to assess the cognitive status of the elderly at risk of MCI/AD. A systematic review was conducted and the correlation of serious game results with cognitive test scores were extracted from eligible studies for meta-analysis. We analyzed the correlation between the results of serious games with the scores of mini-mental state examination (MMSE), Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-revised edition (ACE-R), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) tests to evaluate cognitive status of the elderly at risk of MCI/AD, as well as the cognitive aspects examined by these tests. The random-effects model was used to obtain the overall correlation coefficient to assess the relationship between the results of serious games and the above mentioned paper-and-pencil tests. The correlation of game results with the MMSE, ACE-R, and MoCA was 0.604, 0.682, with 0.682, respectively. The correlation between the results of the games with the score of each cognitive aspect was also calculated. Overall, there is a positive correlation between serious game scores in terms of accurate patients' reactions with the scores of MMSE, ACE-R, and MoCA tests. Among the cognitive aspects, the highest correlation was obtained for fluency (0.591). For abstraction, however, the correlation was the lowest (0.036). In all three tests, the correlation was >0.6 and in cognitive aspects was <0.6. Thus, more studies should be conducted to develop serious games that are more in line with cognitive tests.
期刊介绍:
Games for Health Journal is the first peer-reviewed journal dedicated to advancing the impact of game research, technologies, and applications on human health and well-being. This ground-breaking publication delivers original research that directly impacts this emerging, widely-recognized, and increasingly adopted area of healthcare. Games are rapidly becoming an important tool for improving health behaviors ranging from healthy lifestyle habits and behavior modification, to self-management of illness and chronic conditions to motivating and supporting physical activity. Games are also increasingly used to train healthcare professionals in methods for diagnosis, medical procedures, patient monitoring, as well as for responding to epidemics and natural disasters. Games for Health Journal is a must for anyone interested in the research and design of health games that integrate well-tested, evidence-based behavioral health strategies to help improve health behaviors and to support the delivery of care. Games for Health Journal coverage includes: -Nutrition, weight management, obesity -Disease prevention, self-management, and adherence -Cognitive, mental, emotional, and behavioral health -Games in home-to-clinic telehealth systems