Salivary and Serum Analytes and Their Associations with Self-rated Health Among Healthy Young Adults

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Angelina Majeno, Douglas A. Granger, Crystal I. Bryce, Jenna L. Riis
{"title":"Salivary and Serum Analytes and Their Associations with Self-rated Health Among Healthy Young Adults","authors":"Angelina Majeno, Douglas A. Granger, Crystal I. Bryce, Jenna L. Riis","doi":"10.1007/s12529-024-10322-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Understanding the biological processes underlying poor self-rated health (SRH) can inform prevention efforts. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of using self-reported measures and self-collected biospecimens, such as saliva, to understand physiological functioning and assist with health surveillance and promotion. However, the associations between salivary analytes and SRH remain understudied. The current study addresses this gap.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>In a laboratory-based study, 99 healthy adults (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 23.8 years, SD = 4.5, 55% men, 43% non-Hispanic White) reported their SRH and provided saliva and blood samples that were assayed for adiponectin, C-reactive protein (CRP), uric acid (UA), and cytokines (IL‐1β, IL‐6, IL‐8, TNF-α). Principal component analyses assessed the component loadings and generated factor scores for saliva and serum analytes. Binary logistic regressions examined the associations between these components and poor SRH.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Salivary analytes loaded onto two components (component 1: adiponectin and cytokines; component 2: CRP and UA) explaining 58% of the variance. Serum analytes grouped onto three components (component 1: IL-8 and TNF-α; component 2: CRP, IL-1β, and IL-6; component 3: adiponectin and UA) explaining 76% of the variance. Higher salivary component 1 scores predicted higher odds of reporting poor SRH (OR 1.53, 95%CI [1.10, 2.11]). Higher serum component 2 scores predicted higher odds of reporting poor SRH (OR 2.37, 95%CI [1.20, 4.67]). When examined in the same model, salivary component 1 (OR 1.79, 95%CI [1.17, 2.75]) and serum component 2 were associated with poorer SRH (OR 7.74, 95%CI [2.18, 27.40]).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>In our sample, whether measured in saliva or serum, indices of inflammatory processes were associated with SRH.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-024-10322-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Understanding the biological processes underlying poor self-rated health (SRH) can inform prevention efforts. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of using self-reported measures and self-collected biospecimens, such as saliva, to understand physiological functioning and assist with health surveillance and promotion. However, the associations between salivary analytes and SRH remain understudied. The current study addresses this gap.

Methods

In a laboratory-based study, 99 healthy adults (Mage = 23.8 years, SD = 4.5, 55% men, 43% non-Hispanic White) reported their SRH and provided saliva and blood samples that were assayed for adiponectin, C-reactive protein (CRP), uric acid (UA), and cytokines (IL‐1β, IL‐6, IL‐8, TNF-α). Principal component analyses assessed the component loadings and generated factor scores for saliva and serum analytes. Binary logistic regressions examined the associations between these components and poor SRH.

Results

Salivary analytes loaded onto two components (component 1: adiponectin and cytokines; component 2: CRP and UA) explaining 58% of the variance. Serum analytes grouped onto three components (component 1: IL-8 and TNF-α; component 2: CRP, IL-1β, and IL-6; component 3: adiponectin and UA) explaining 76% of the variance. Higher salivary component 1 scores predicted higher odds of reporting poor SRH (OR 1.53, 95%CI [1.10, 2.11]). Higher serum component 2 scores predicted higher odds of reporting poor SRH (OR 2.37, 95%CI [1.20, 4.67]). When examined in the same model, salivary component 1 (OR 1.79, 95%CI [1.17, 2.75]) and serum component 2 were associated with poorer SRH (OR 7.74, 95%CI [2.18, 27.40]).

Conclusions

In our sample, whether measured in saliva or serum, indices of inflammatory processes were associated with SRH.

健康年轻人的唾液和血清分析物及其与自评健康状况的关系
背景了解不良自评健康状况(SRH)背后的生物过程可为预防工作提供依据。COVID-19 大流行凸显了使用自我报告的测量方法和自我采集的生物样本(如唾液)来了解生理功能并协助健康监测和促进的重要性。然而,唾液分析物与性健康和生殖健康之间的关系仍未得到充分研究。方法在一项基于实验室的研究中,99 名健康成年人(年龄 = 23.8 岁,SD = 4.5,55% 为男性,43% 为非西班牙裔白人)报告了他们的 SRH,并提供了唾液和血液样本,对这些样本进行了脂肪连蛋白、C 反应蛋白 (CRP)、尿酸 (UA) 和细胞因子(IL-1β、IL-6、IL-8、TNF-α)的检测。主成分分析评估了成分负荷,并生成了唾液和血清分析物的因子得分。结果唾液分析物载入两个成分(成分 1:脂肪连素和细胞因子;成分 2:CRP 和 UA),解释了 58% 的方差。血清分析物分为三个成分(成分 1:IL-8 和 TNF-α;成分 2:CRP、IL-1β 和 IL-6;成分 3:脂肪连接蛋白和 UA),解释了 76% 的方差。唾液成分 1 分数越高,报告 SRH 较差的几率越高(OR 1.53,95%CI [1.10,2.11])。血清成分 2 分数越高,报告 SRH 较差的几率越高(OR 2.37,95%CI [1.20,4.67])。结论在我们的样本中,无论是唾液还是血清,炎症过程指数都与 SRH 相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信