{"title":"Impact of closed pores on gas transport and its implication for optimizing drainage borehole design","authors":"Hexiang Xu, Ting Liu, Cheng Zhai, Jizhao Xu, Yangfeng Zheng, Xinyu Zhu, Yu Wang, Ting Huang","doi":"10.1063/5.0230148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mining disturbances can rupture the closed pores, releasing the gas and potentially triggering gas accidents. The pre-drainage of gas via boreholes is the primary measure for preventing coal and gas outbursts. Nevertheless, the influence of closed pores on gas migration remains unclear, leading to suboptimal borehole spacing and radius. Therefore, a gas–solid coupled model incorporating closed pores was developed to investigate the influence of closed pores on gas migration during gas drainage (GD). Subsequently, response surface methodology was employed to investigate the input parameters and their interactions on residual gas content (RGC) and pre-drainage time (PDT). Finally, an optimization methodology for borehole spacing/radius was presented. The results show that both RGC and PDT exhibit a positive correlation with the ratio of closed porosity to total porosity (λ) and the ratio of closed pore diffusion coefficient to that of the open pore (Do/Dc). Initially, the total gas production is primarily extracted from fractures and open pores, followed by closed pores in the later stages. Single-factor analysis demonstrates that λ, permeability, and Do/Dc have a more significant impact on RGC and PDT compared to borehole spacing and borehole radius. Borehole spacing interacts more strongly with λ, permeability and Do/Dc than borehole radius. An optimization method for borehole spacing and borehole radius, constrained by PDT, RGC, and the number of boreholes, is proposed using response surface optimization maps. This method provides guidance for borehole construction to optimize GD efficiency and minimize RGC.","PeriodicalId":20066,"journal":{"name":"Physics of Fluids","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics of Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0230148","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mining disturbances can rupture the closed pores, releasing the gas and potentially triggering gas accidents. The pre-drainage of gas via boreholes is the primary measure for preventing coal and gas outbursts. Nevertheless, the influence of closed pores on gas migration remains unclear, leading to suboptimal borehole spacing and radius. Therefore, a gas–solid coupled model incorporating closed pores was developed to investigate the influence of closed pores on gas migration during gas drainage (GD). Subsequently, response surface methodology was employed to investigate the input parameters and their interactions on residual gas content (RGC) and pre-drainage time (PDT). Finally, an optimization methodology for borehole spacing/radius was presented. The results show that both RGC and PDT exhibit a positive correlation with the ratio of closed porosity to total porosity (λ) and the ratio of closed pore diffusion coefficient to that of the open pore (Do/Dc). Initially, the total gas production is primarily extracted from fractures and open pores, followed by closed pores in the later stages. Single-factor analysis demonstrates that λ, permeability, and Do/Dc have a more significant impact on RGC and PDT compared to borehole spacing and borehole radius. Borehole spacing interacts more strongly with λ, permeability and Do/Dc than borehole radius. An optimization method for borehole spacing and borehole radius, constrained by PDT, RGC, and the number of boreholes, is proposed using response surface optimization maps. This method provides guidance for borehole construction to optimize GD efficiency and minimize RGC.
期刊介绍:
Physics of Fluids (PoF) is a preeminent journal devoted to publishing original theoretical, computational, and experimental contributions to the understanding of the dynamics of gases, liquids, and complex or multiphase fluids. Topics published in PoF are diverse and reflect the most important subjects in fluid dynamics, including, but not limited to:
-Acoustics
-Aerospace and aeronautical flow
-Astrophysical flow
-Biofluid mechanics
-Cavitation and cavitating flows
-Combustion flows
-Complex fluids
-Compressible flow
-Computational fluid dynamics
-Contact lines
-Continuum mechanics
-Convection
-Cryogenic flow
-Droplets
-Electrical and magnetic effects in fluid flow
-Foam, bubble, and film mechanics
-Flow control
-Flow instability and transition
-Flow orientation and anisotropy
-Flows with other transport phenomena
-Flows with complex boundary conditions
-Flow visualization
-Fluid mechanics
-Fluid physical properties
-Fluid–structure interactions
-Free surface flows
-Geophysical flow
-Interfacial flow
-Knudsen flow
-Laminar flow
-Liquid crystals
-Mathematics of fluids
-Micro- and nanofluid mechanics
-Mixing
-Molecular theory
-Nanofluidics
-Particulate, multiphase, and granular flow
-Processing flows
-Relativistic fluid mechanics
-Rotating flows
-Shock wave phenomena
-Soft matter
-Stratified flows
-Supercritical fluids
-Superfluidity
-Thermodynamics of flow systems
-Transonic flow
-Turbulent flow
-Viscous and non-Newtonian flow
-Viscoelasticity
-Vortex dynamics
-Waves