Radiographic Accuracy of Identifying Anterolateral Tibial Plafond Involvement in Pronation Abduction Ankle Fractures.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Abrianna S Robles,Zachary A Rockov,Melissa M Gross,Brett A Ewing,Charles M Lieder,Brian M Weatherford,Ashley E Levack,John M Garlich,Justin M Haller,Jeffrey S Earhart,Geoffrey S Marecek
{"title":"Radiographic Accuracy of Identifying Anterolateral Tibial Plafond Involvement in Pronation Abduction Ankle Fractures.","authors":"Abrianna S Robles,Zachary A Rockov,Melissa M Gross,Brett A Ewing,Charles M Lieder,Brian M Weatherford,Ashley E Levack,John M Garlich,Justin M Haller,Jeffrey S Earhart,Geoffrey S Marecek","doi":"10.1097/bot.0000000000002911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\r\nTo evaluate the incidence of anterolateral tibial plafond involvement in pronation-abduction (PAB) ankle fractures and analyze the accuracy of radiographs in detecting anterolateral tibial plafond involvement, impaction, and predicting the need for direct visualization and an articular reduction.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nDesign: A multi-institutional retrospective chart review.\r\n\r\nSETTING\r\nFive level 1 trauma centers in the United States.\r\n\r\nPATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA\r\nAdult patients with PAB ankle fractures (OTA/AO 44B2.3, 44C2.2, 44C2.3) from 2020-2022 were reviewed by 7 fellowship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeons. They were queried about the presence of anterolateral tibial plafond involvement and impaction, and whether they would need direct visualization and an articular reduction using both radiographs and CT.\r\n\r\nOUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND COMPARISONS\r\nThe presence of anterolateral tibial plafond impaction was tabulated separately using radiographs and CT scans. The accuracy of radiographs and changes in surgical plan after CT review were calculated using CT as the gold standard.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\n61 fractures in 61 patients were evaluated with CT and/or plain radiographs. Using plain radiographs, anterolateral tibial plafond involvement and impaction were identified in 61% and 36% of cases, respectively. In the 38 fractures with both plain radiographs and CT scans, anterolateral tibial plafond involvement was identified in 66% of radiographs and 74% of CT scans (p = 0.4). Plafond impaction was identified in 42% of plain radiographs and 37% of CT scans (p = 0.62). There was no difference in the rate of involvement between radiographs and CT scan. The diagnosis of anterolateral tibial plafond impaction using plain radiographs was correct in 74% of fractures when compared to CT imaging, resulting in a sensitivity of 71%, a specificity of 75%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 62%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 82%. Plain radiographs correctly predicted the need for direct visualization and an articular reduction in 74% of cases and had a PPV of 59% and a NPV of 86%.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nAnterolateral tibial plafond involvement and impaction was present on CT in 74% and 37% of pronation-abduction (PAB) ankle fractures, respectively. Plain radiographs had higher NPV for identifying impaction and the need for articular reduction than they did sensitivity, specificity or PPV. CT is an important tool for preoperative planning that should be considered when planning for operative fixation of PAB ankle fractures.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nPrognostic level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000002911","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the incidence of anterolateral tibial plafond involvement in pronation-abduction (PAB) ankle fractures and analyze the accuracy of radiographs in detecting anterolateral tibial plafond involvement, impaction, and predicting the need for direct visualization and an articular reduction. METHODS Design: A multi-institutional retrospective chart review. SETTING Five level 1 trauma centers in the United States. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA Adult patients with PAB ankle fractures (OTA/AO 44B2.3, 44C2.2, 44C2.3) from 2020-2022 were reviewed by 7 fellowship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeons. They were queried about the presence of anterolateral tibial plafond involvement and impaction, and whether they would need direct visualization and an articular reduction using both radiographs and CT. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND COMPARISONS The presence of anterolateral tibial plafond impaction was tabulated separately using radiographs and CT scans. The accuracy of radiographs and changes in surgical plan after CT review were calculated using CT as the gold standard. RESULTS 61 fractures in 61 patients were evaluated with CT and/or plain radiographs. Using plain radiographs, anterolateral tibial plafond involvement and impaction were identified in 61% and 36% of cases, respectively. In the 38 fractures with both plain radiographs and CT scans, anterolateral tibial plafond involvement was identified in 66% of radiographs and 74% of CT scans (p = 0.4). Plafond impaction was identified in 42% of plain radiographs and 37% of CT scans (p = 0.62). There was no difference in the rate of involvement between radiographs and CT scan. The diagnosis of anterolateral tibial plafond impaction using plain radiographs was correct in 74% of fractures when compared to CT imaging, resulting in a sensitivity of 71%, a specificity of 75%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 62%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 82%. Plain radiographs correctly predicted the need for direct visualization and an articular reduction in 74% of cases and had a PPV of 59% and a NPV of 86%. CONCLUSIONS Anterolateral tibial plafond involvement and impaction was present on CT in 74% and 37% of pronation-abduction (PAB) ankle fractures, respectively. Plain radiographs had higher NPV for identifying impaction and the need for articular reduction than they did sensitivity, specificity or PPV. CT is an important tool for preoperative planning that should be considered when planning for operative fixation of PAB ankle fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
仰卧内收踝关节骨折患者胫骨前外侧骺板受累的影像学准确性。
目的评估代偿-内收(PAB)踝关节骨折中胫骨前外侧平台受累的发生率,并分析X光片在检测胫骨前外侧平台受累、嵌顿以及预测是否需要直接显像和关节复位方面的准确性:患者选择标准:由 7 名受过研究培训的创伤骨科外科医生对 2020-2022 年间 PAB 踝关节骨折(OTA/AO 44B2.3、44C2.2、44C2.3)的成人患者进行复查。他们被问及是否存在胫骨前外侧平台受累和嵌顿,以及是否需要使用X光片和CT进行直接观察和关节缩窄。结果61名患者的61处骨折均通过CT和/或普通X光片进行了评估。通过普通X光片,分别有61%和36%的病例发现了胫骨前外侧骺板受累和嵌顿。在同时进行普通X光片和CT扫描的38例骨折中,66%的X光片和74%的CT扫描发现胫骨前外侧骺板受累(P = 0.4)。42%的X光平片和37%的CT扫描发现了韧带板块嵌顿(p = 0.62)。X光片和CT扫描的受累率没有差异。与CT成像相比,使用普通X光片诊断胫骨前外侧平台嵌顿的正确率为74%,灵敏度为71%,特异性为75%,阳性预测值(PPV)为62%,阴性预测值(NPV)为82%。结论分别有 74% 和 37% 的代偿-内收型 (PAB) 踝关节骨折在 CT 上显示胫骨外侧骺板受累和嵌顿。平片在识别嵌顿和关节复位需求方面的 NPV 值高于敏感性、特异性或 PPV 值。CT是术前计划的重要工具,在计划对PAB踝关节骨折进行手术固定时应加以考虑。有关证据级别的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信