Karl D. Gordon, G. C. Sloan, Macarena Garcia Marin, Mattia Libralato, George Rieke, Jonathan A. Aguilar, Ralph Bohlin, Misty Cracraft, Marjorie Decleir, Andras Gaspar, David R. Law, Alberto Noriega-Crespo, Michael Regan
{"title":"The James Webb Space Telescope Absolute Flux Calibration. II. Mid-Infrared Instrument Imaging and Coronagraphy","authors":"Karl D. Gordon, G. C. Sloan, Macarena Garcia Marin, Mattia Libralato, George Rieke, Jonathan A. Aguilar, Ralph Bohlin, Misty Cracraft, Marjorie Decleir, Andras Gaspar, David R. Law, Alberto Noriega-Crespo, Michael Regan","doi":"arxiv-2409.10443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The absolute flux calibration of the Mid-Infrared Instrument Imaging and\nCoronagraphy is based on observations of multiple stars taken during the first\n2.5 years of JWST operations. The observations were designed to ensure that the\nflux calibration is valid for a range of flux densities, different subarrays,\nand different types of stars. The flux calibration was measured by combining\nobserved aperture photometry corrected to infinite aperture with predictions\nbased on previous observations and models of stellar atmospheres. A subset of\nthese observations were combined with model point-spread-functions to measure\nthe corrections to infinite aperture. Variations in the calibration factor with\ntime, flux density, background level, type of star, subarray, integration time,\nrate, and well depth were investigated, and the only significant variations\nwere with time and subarray. Observations of the same star taken approximately\nevery month revealed a modest time-dependent response loss seen mainly at the\nlongest wavelengths. This loss is well characterized by a decaying exponential\nwith a time constant of ~200 days. After correcting for the response loss, the\nband-dependent scatter around the corrected average (aka repeatability) was\nfound to range from 0.1 to 1.2%. Signals in observations taken with different\nsubarrays can be lower by up to 3.4% compared to FULL frame. After correcting\nfor the time and subarray dependencies, the scatter in the calibration factors\nmeasured for individual stars ranges from 1 to 4% depending on the band. The\nformal uncertainties on the flux calibration averaged for all observations are\n0.3 to 1.0%, with longer-wavelength bands generally having larger\nuncertainties.","PeriodicalId":501068,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.10443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The absolute flux calibration of the Mid-Infrared Instrument Imaging and
Coronagraphy is based on observations of multiple stars taken during the first
2.5 years of JWST operations. The observations were designed to ensure that the
flux calibration is valid for a range of flux densities, different subarrays,
and different types of stars. The flux calibration was measured by combining
observed aperture photometry corrected to infinite aperture with predictions
based on previous observations and models of stellar atmospheres. A subset of
these observations were combined with model point-spread-functions to measure
the corrections to infinite aperture. Variations in the calibration factor with
time, flux density, background level, type of star, subarray, integration time,
rate, and well depth were investigated, and the only significant variations
were with time and subarray. Observations of the same star taken approximately
every month revealed a modest time-dependent response loss seen mainly at the
longest wavelengths. This loss is well characterized by a decaying exponential
with a time constant of ~200 days. After correcting for the response loss, the
band-dependent scatter around the corrected average (aka repeatability) was
found to range from 0.1 to 1.2%. Signals in observations taken with different
subarrays can be lower by up to 3.4% compared to FULL frame. After correcting
for the time and subarray dependencies, the scatter in the calibration factors
measured for individual stars ranges from 1 to 4% depending on the band. The
formal uncertainties on the flux calibration averaged for all observations are
0.3 to 1.0%, with longer-wavelength bands generally having larger
uncertainties.