The James Webb Space Telescope Absolute Flux Calibration. II. Mid-Infrared Instrument Imaging and Coronagraphy

Karl D. Gordon, G. C. Sloan, Macarena Garcia Marin, Mattia Libralato, George Rieke, Jonathan A. Aguilar, Ralph Bohlin, Misty Cracraft, Marjorie Decleir, Andras Gaspar, David R. Law, Alberto Noriega-Crespo, Michael Regan
{"title":"The James Webb Space Telescope Absolute Flux Calibration. II. Mid-Infrared Instrument Imaging and Coronagraphy","authors":"Karl D. Gordon, G. C. Sloan, Macarena Garcia Marin, Mattia Libralato, George Rieke, Jonathan A. Aguilar, Ralph Bohlin, Misty Cracraft, Marjorie Decleir, Andras Gaspar, David R. Law, Alberto Noriega-Crespo, Michael Regan","doi":"arxiv-2409.10443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The absolute flux calibration of the Mid-Infrared Instrument Imaging and\nCoronagraphy is based on observations of multiple stars taken during the first\n2.5 years of JWST operations. The observations were designed to ensure that the\nflux calibration is valid for a range of flux densities, different subarrays,\nand different types of stars. The flux calibration was measured by combining\nobserved aperture photometry corrected to infinite aperture with predictions\nbased on previous observations and models of stellar atmospheres. A subset of\nthese observations were combined with model point-spread-functions to measure\nthe corrections to infinite aperture. Variations in the calibration factor with\ntime, flux density, background level, type of star, subarray, integration time,\nrate, and well depth were investigated, and the only significant variations\nwere with time and subarray. Observations of the same star taken approximately\nevery month revealed a modest time-dependent response loss seen mainly at the\nlongest wavelengths. This loss is well characterized by a decaying exponential\nwith a time constant of ~200 days. After correcting for the response loss, the\nband-dependent scatter around the corrected average (aka repeatability) was\nfound to range from 0.1 to 1.2%. Signals in observations taken with different\nsubarrays can be lower by up to 3.4% compared to FULL frame. After correcting\nfor the time and subarray dependencies, the scatter in the calibration factors\nmeasured for individual stars ranges from 1 to 4% depending on the band. The\nformal uncertainties on the flux calibration averaged for all observations are\n0.3 to 1.0%, with longer-wavelength bands generally having larger\nuncertainties.","PeriodicalId":501068,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.10443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The absolute flux calibration of the Mid-Infrared Instrument Imaging and Coronagraphy is based on observations of multiple stars taken during the first 2.5 years of JWST operations. The observations were designed to ensure that the flux calibration is valid for a range of flux densities, different subarrays, and different types of stars. The flux calibration was measured by combining observed aperture photometry corrected to infinite aperture with predictions based on previous observations and models of stellar atmospheres. A subset of these observations were combined with model point-spread-functions to measure the corrections to infinite aperture. Variations in the calibration factor with time, flux density, background level, type of star, subarray, integration time, rate, and well depth were investigated, and the only significant variations were with time and subarray. Observations of the same star taken approximately every month revealed a modest time-dependent response loss seen mainly at the longest wavelengths. This loss is well characterized by a decaying exponential with a time constant of ~200 days. After correcting for the response loss, the band-dependent scatter around the corrected average (aka repeatability) was found to range from 0.1 to 1.2%. Signals in observations taken with different subarrays can be lower by up to 3.4% compared to FULL frame. After correcting for the time and subarray dependencies, the scatter in the calibration factors measured for individual stars ranges from 1 to 4% depending on the band. The formal uncertainties on the flux calibration averaged for all observations are 0.3 to 1.0%, with longer-wavelength bands generally having larger uncertainties.
詹姆斯-韦伯太空望远镜绝对通量校准。II.中红外仪器成像和日冕仪
中红外仪器成像和日冕仪的绝对通量校准基于 JWST 运行头两年半期间对多颗恒星的观测。这些观测旨在确保通量校准对一系列通量密度、不同子阵列和不同类型的恒星有效。通量校准的测量方法是将观测到的孔径光度计校正为无限孔径,并根据以前的观测结果和恒星大气模型进行预测。这些观测数据的一个子集与模型点散布函数相结合,以测量无限孔径的校正系数。研究了校准因子随时间、通量密度、背景水平、恒星类型、子阵列、积分时间、速率和井深的变化情况,唯一显著的变化是随时间和子阵列的变化。大约每个月对同一颗恒星进行的观测表明,主要在最长波长处会出现适度的随时间变化的响应损失。这种损失的特征是一个时间常数约为 200 天的指数衰减。在对响应损失进行校正后,发现校正后平均值(又称重复性)周围与波段有关的散度在 0.1%到 1.2%之间。使用不同子阵列进行观测时,信号可比全幅低 3.4%。在校正了时间和子阵列的相关性之后,根据波段的不同,单个恒星测量的校准因子的散度在 1% 到 4% 之间。所有观测的平均通量校准的形式不确定性为 0.3%到 1.0%,长波长波段的不确定性通常较大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信