G. Valle, M. Dell'Omodarme, P. G. Prada Moroni, S. Degl'Innocenti
{"title":"Testing the asteroseismic estimates of stellar radii with surface brightness-colour relations and Gaia DR3 parallaxes. Red giants and red clump stars","authors":"G. Valle, M. Dell'Omodarme, P. G. Prada Moroni, S. Degl'Innocenti","doi":"arxiv-2409.10050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compared stellar radii derived from asteroseismic scaling relations with\nthose estimated using two independent surface brightness-colour relations\n(SBCRs) and Gaia DR3 parallaxes. We cross-matched asteroseismic and astrometric\ndata for over 6,400 RGB and RC stars from the APO-K2 catalogue with the TESS\nInput Catalogue v8.2 to obtain precise V band magnitudes and E(B-V) colour\nexcesses. We then adopted two different SBCRs from the literature to derive\nstellar radius estimates, denoted as $R^a$ and $R^b$, respectively. We analysed\nthe ratio of these SBCR-derived radii to the asteroseismic radius estimates,\n$R$, provided in the APO-K2 catalogue. Both SBCRs exhibited good agreement with\nasteroseismic radius estimates. On average, $R^a$ was overestimated by 1.2%\nwith respect to $R$, while $R^b$ was underestimated by 2.5%. For stars larger\nthan 20 $R_{\\odot}$, SBCR radii are systematically lower than asteroseismic\nones. The agreement with asteroseismic radii shows a strong dependence on the\nparallax. The dispersion is halved for stars with a parallax greater than 2.5\nmas. In this subsample, $R^b$ showed perfect agreement with $R$, while $R^a$\nremained slightly overestimated by 3%. A trend with [Fe/H] of 4% to 6% per dex\nwas found. For stars less massive than about 0.95 $M_{\\odot}$, SBCR radii were\nsignificantly higher than asteroseismic ones, by about 6%. This overestimation\ncorrelated with the presence of extended helium cores in these stars'\nstructures relative to their envelopes. Furthermore, radius ratios showed a\ndichotomous behaviour at higher masses, mainly due to the presence of several\nRC stars with SBCR radii significantly lower with respect to asteroseismology.\nThis behaviour originates from a different response of asteroseismic scaling\nrelations and SBCR to [$\\alpha$/Fe] abundance ratios for massive stars, both in\nRGB and RC phases, which is reported here for the first time.","PeriodicalId":501068,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.10050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We compared stellar radii derived from asteroseismic scaling relations with
those estimated using two independent surface brightness-colour relations
(SBCRs) and Gaia DR3 parallaxes. We cross-matched asteroseismic and astrometric
data for over 6,400 RGB and RC stars from the APO-K2 catalogue with the TESS
Input Catalogue v8.2 to obtain precise V band magnitudes and E(B-V) colour
excesses. We then adopted two different SBCRs from the literature to derive
stellar radius estimates, denoted as $R^a$ and $R^b$, respectively. We analysed
the ratio of these SBCR-derived radii to the asteroseismic radius estimates,
$R$, provided in the APO-K2 catalogue. Both SBCRs exhibited good agreement with
asteroseismic radius estimates. On average, $R^a$ was overestimated by 1.2%
with respect to $R$, while $R^b$ was underestimated by 2.5%. For stars larger
than 20 $R_{\odot}$, SBCR radii are systematically lower than asteroseismic
ones. The agreement with asteroseismic radii shows a strong dependence on the
parallax. The dispersion is halved for stars with a parallax greater than 2.5
mas. In this subsample, $R^b$ showed perfect agreement with $R$, while $R^a$
remained slightly overestimated by 3%. A trend with [Fe/H] of 4% to 6% per dex
was found. For stars less massive than about 0.95 $M_{\odot}$, SBCR radii were
significantly higher than asteroseismic ones, by about 6%. This overestimation
correlated with the presence of extended helium cores in these stars'
structures relative to their envelopes. Furthermore, radius ratios showed a
dichotomous behaviour at higher masses, mainly due to the presence of several
RC stars with SBCR radii significantly lower with respect to asteroseismology.
This behaviour originates from a different response of asteroseismic scaling
relations and SBCR to [$\alpha$/Fe] abundance ratios for massive stars, both in
RGB and RC phases, which is reported here for the first time.