The impact of facility type on surgical outcomes in colon cancer patients: analysis of the national cancer database

Ashley Shustak, Nir Horesh, Sameh Hany Emile, Zoe Garoufalia, Rachel Gefen, Ebram Salama, Stephen Sharp, Steven D. Wexner
{"title":"The impact of facility type on surgical outcomes in colon cancer patients: analysis of the national cancer database","authors":"Ashley Shustak, Nir Horesh, Sameh Hany Emile, Zoe Garoufalia, Rachel Gefen, Ebram Salama, Stephen Sharp, Steven D. Wexner","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11230-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>The type of facility where patients with colon cancer are treated may play a significant role in their outcomes. We aimed to investigate the influence of facility types included in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) on surgical outcomes of colon cancer.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Retrospective cohort analysis of all patients with stage I–III colon cancer included in the NCDB database between 2010 and 2019 was performed. Patients were grouped based on facility type: Academic/Research Programs (ARP), Community Cancer Programs (CCP), Comprehensive Community Cancer Programs (CCCP), and Integrated Network Cancer Programs (INCP). Study outcomes included overall survival, 30- and 90-day mortality, 30-day readmission and conversion to open surgery.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>125,935 patients were included with a median age of 68.7 years (50.5% females). Most tumors were in the right colon (50.6%). Patient were distributed among facility types as ARP (n = 34,321, 27%), CCP (n = 12,692, 10%), CCCP (n = 54,356, 43%), and INCP (n = 24,566, 19%). In terms of surgical approach, laparoscopy was more commonly used in ARP (46%) (p &lt; 0.001). Laparotomy was more common in CCP (58.7%) (p &lt; 0.001), and conversely, CCP had the least amount of robotic surgery (3.9%) (p &lt; 0.001). Median overall survival was highest in ARP (129 months, 95% CI 127.4–134.1) and lowest in CCP (103.7 months, 95% CI 100.1–106.7) (p &lt; 0.001). Conversion rates were comparable between ARP (12%), CCCP (12%) and INCP (11.8%) but were higher in CCP (15.5%) (p &lt; 0.001). 30-day readmission rates and 30-day mortality rates were significantly lower in ARP compared to other facility types (p &lt; 0.001).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings display differences in surgical outcomes of colon cancer patients among facility types. The findings suggest better outcomes in terms of operative access and survival at ARP as compared to other facilities. These findings underscore the importance of understanding facility-specific factors that may influence patient outcomes and can guide resource allocation and targeted interventions for improving colon cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"114 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11230-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The type of facility where patients with colon cancer are treated may play a significant role in their outcomes. We aimed to investigate the influence of facility types included in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) on surgical outcomes of colon cancer.

Methods

Retrospective cohort analysis of all patients with stage I–III colon cancer included in the NCDB database between 2010 and 2019 was performed. Patients were grouped based on facility type: Academic/Research Programs (ARP), Community Cancer Programs (CCP), Comprehensive Community Cancer Programs (CCCP), and Integrated Network Cancer Programs (INCP). Study outcomes included overall survival, 30- and 90-day mortality, 30-day readmission and conversion to open surgery.

Results

125,935 patients were included with a median age of 68.7 years (50.5% females). Most tumors were in the right colon (50.6%). Patient were distributed among facility types as ARP (n = 34,321, 27%), CCP (n = 12,692, 10%), CCCP (n = 54,356, 43%), and INCP (n = 24,566, 19%). In terms of surgical approach, laparoscopy was more commonly used in ARP (46%) (p < 0.001). Laparotomy was more common in CCP (58.7%) (p < 0.001), and conversely, CCP had the least amount of robotic surgery (3.9%) (p < 0.001). Median overall survival was highest in ARP (129 months, 95% CI 127.4–134.1) and lowest in CCP (103.7 months, 95% CI 100.1–106.7) (p < 0.001). Conversion rates were comparable between ARP (12%), CCCP (12%) and INCP (11.8%) but were higher in CCP (15.5%) (p < 0.001). 30-day readmission rates and 30-day mortality rates were significantly lower in ARP compared to other facility types (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our findings display differences in surgical outcomes of colon cancer patients among facility types. The findings suggest better outcomes in terms of operative access and survival at ARP as compared to other facilities. These findings underscore the importance of understanding facility-specific factors that may influence patient outcomes and can guide resource allocation and targeted interventions for improving colon cancer care.

Abstract Image

设施类型对结肠癌患者手术效果的影响:全国癌症数据库分析
背景结肠癌患者接受治疗的医疗机构类型可能会对其治疗效果产生重要影响。我们旨在研究国家癌症数据库(NCDB)中收录的设施类型对结肠癌手术治疗效果的影响。根据医院类型对患者进行分组:学术/研究项目(ARP)、社区癌症项目(CCP)、综合社区癌症项目(CCCP)和综合网络癌症项目(INCP)。研究结果包括总生存率、30 天和 90 天死亡率、30 天再入院率和转为开放手术率。结果125,935 名患者入选,中位年龄为 68.7 岁(50.5% 为女性)。大多数肿瘤位于右侧结肠(50.6%)。患者的设施类型分布为 ARP(34,321 人,27%)、CCP(12,692 人,10%)、CCCP(54,356 人,43%)和 INCP(24,566 人,19%)。就手术方式而言,腹腔镜在 ARP 中更常用(46%)(p < 0.001)。腹腔镜手术在 CCP 中更为常见(58.7%)(p <0.001),相反,CCP 的机器人手术最少(3.9%)(p <0.001)。ARP的中位总生存期最高(129个月,95% CI 127.4-134.1),CCP最低(103.7个月,95% CI 100.1-106.7)(p <0.001)。ARP(12%)、CCCP(12%)和 INCP(11.8%)之间的转归率相当,但 CCP 的转归率更高(15.5%)(p <0.001)。与其他设施类型相比,ARP 的 30 天再入院率和 30 天死亡率明显较低(p < 0.001)。研究结果表明,与其他设施相比,ARP 在手术入路和存活率方面的结果更好。这些发现强调了了解可能影响患者预后的特定设施因素的重要性,并可为改善结肠癌护理的资源分配和有针对性的干预措施提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信