Dosimetry at cellular level for the alpha-emitting radionuclides actinium-225, astatine-211 and radium-223 for bone metastasis cells from castration resistant prostate cancer.

Catherine Costa Oliveira-Silva,Mateus S Maillard,Raoni Silva,Lidia Vasconcelos de Sá
{"title":"Dosimetry at cellular level for the alpha-emitting radionuclides actinium-225, astatine-211 and radium-223 for bone metastasis cells from castration resistant prostate cancer.","authors":"Catherine Costa Oliveira-Silva,Mateus S Maillard,Raoni Silva,Lidia Vasconcelos de Sá","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/ad7b9a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives
The aim is to evaluate energy deposition in the nucleus and cytoplasm in targeted alpha therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer by modeling two cell lines, PC3 (osteolytic) and LNCaP C4-2 (osteoblastic), for actinium-225, astatine-211, and radium-223 and their progeny, using Monte Carlo simulations with the GATE/Geant4 code.
Approach
We developed single cell and cell clusters models and couple them to Monte Carlo simulations performed on the GATE platform version 9.3, setting the GEANT4-DNA physics list emstandard_opt3_mixed_dna for At-211, Ac-225 and Ra-223 progenies. We considered three radionuclide distributions as a sources: the nucleus, the cytoplasm and the whole cell.
Main Results
When the nucleus was considered as a target, the S-values (N←N) calculated for At-211, Ac-225 and Ra-223 progenies were significantly higher, within 60-90%, than S-values (N←Cy), demonstrating less influence of cytoplasm internalization. When the cytoplasm was considering as a target, the S-values (Cy←Cy) calculated for At-211, Ac-225 and Ra-223 progeny were significantly higher, within 30-90%, than the S-values (Cy←N). When no progeny migration occurs and the nucleus was considered as the target, the cumulative S-values (N←N) calculated for At-211, Ac-225 and Ra-223 were significantly higher, within 50- 70%, than the S-values (N←N) computed for At-211, Ac-225, and Ra-223. Comparing the cumulative S-values, Ac-225 and 
Ra-223 therapies is more effective, in terms of deposited energy in a target, than that with At-211.
Significance
The data presented in this research indicates that Ac-225 therapy may be theoptimum choice due to the energy deposited in the nucleus, as long as the recoil effects and redistribution of progeny are understood. In contrast, At-211 is an alternative to avoid progeny migration. However, to completely analyze the efficacy of radionuclide therapy, other parameters must be considered, such as biological half-life, stability of the transport molecule, progeny migration, excretion pathways, and uptake in different organs.&#xD.","PeriodicalId":519254,"journal":{"name":"Physics in Medicine & Biology","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in Medicine & Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad7b9a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives The aim is to evaluate energy deposition in the nucleus and cytoplasm in targeted alpha therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer by modeling two cell lines, PC3 (osteolytic) and LNCaP C4-2 (osteoblastic), for actinium-225, astatine-211, and radium-223 and their progeny, using Monte Carlo simulations with the GATE/Geant4 code. Approach We developed single cell and cell clusters models and couple them to Monte Carlo simulations performed on the GATE platform version 9.3, setting the GEANT4-DNA physics list emstandard_opt3_mixed_dna for At-211, Ac-225 and Ra-223 progenies. We considered three radionuclide distributions as a sources: the nucleus, the cytoplasm and the whole cell. Main Results When the nucleus was considered as a target, the S-values (N←N) calculated for At-211, Ac-225 and Ra-223 progenies were significantly higher, within 60-90%, than S-values (N←Cy), demonstrating less influence of cytoplasm internalization. When the cytoplasm was considering as a target, the S-values (Cy←Cy) calculated for At-211, Ac-225 and Ra-223 progeny were significantly higher, within 30-90%, than the S-values (Cy←N). When no progeny migration occurs and the nucleus was considered as the target, the cumulative S-values (N←N) calculated for At-211, Ac-225 and Ra-223 were significantly higher, within 50- 70%, than the S-values (N←N) computed for At-211, Ac-225, and Ra-223. Comparing the cumulative S-values, Ac-225 and Ra-223 therapies is more effective, in terms of deposited energy in a target, than that with At-211. Significance The data presented in this research indicates that Ac-225 therapy may be theoptimum choice due to the energy deposited in the nucleus, as long as the recoil effects and redistribution of progeny are understood. In contrast, At-211 is an alternative to avoid progeny migration. However, to completely analyze the efficacy of radionuclide therapy, other parameters must be considered, such as biological half-life, stability of the transport molecule, progeny migration, excretion pathways, and uptake in different organs. .
α放射性核素锕-225、砹-211和镭-223在细胞水平上的剂量测定,用于抗阉割前列腺癌骨转移细胞。
目的 通过对PC3(溶骨性)和LNCaP C4-2(成骨性)这两种细胞系进行建模,利用GATE/Geant4代码进行蒙特卡罗模拟,评估锕225、砹211和镭223及其后代在转移性耐阉割前列腺癌的α靶向治疗中细胞核和细胞质中的能量沉积情况。 方法 我们开发了单细胞和细胞簇模型,并将其与在 9.3 版 GATE 平台上进行的蒙特卡罗模拟相结合,为 At-211、Ac-225 和 Ra-223 后代设置了 GEANT4-DNA 物理列表 emstandard_opt3_mixed_dna。我们将三种放射性核素分布作为源:细胞核、细胞质和整个细胞。当把细胞核作为目标时,计算出的 At-211、Ac-225 和 Ra-223 后代的 S 值(N←N)明显高于 S 值(N←Cy),在 60-90% 之间,这表明细胞质内化的影响较小。当把细胞质作为目标时,计算出的 At-211、Ac-225 和 Ra-223 后代的 S 值(Cy←Cy)明显高于 S 值(Cy←N),在 30-90% 之间。当没有发生后代迁移并将细胞核视为目标时,为 At-211、Ac-225 和 Ra-223 计算的累积 S 值(N←N)明显高于为 At-211、Ac-225 和 Ra-223 计算的 S 值(N←N),在 50-70% 之间。比较累积 S 值,就目标中沉积的能量而言,Ac-225 和 Ra-223 疗法比 At-211 疗法更有效。相比之下,At-211 是避免后代迁移的另一种选择。然而,要全面分析放射性核素疗法的疗效,还必须考虑其他参数,如生物半衰期、转运分子的稳定性、后代迁移、排泄途径以及不同器官的吸收等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信