Perioperative outcomes of same-day discharge laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using the MBSAQIP database

Warda Alam, Justin Wisely, Hassan Nasser
{"title":"Perioperative outcomes of same-day discharge laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using the MBSAQIP database","authors":"Warda Alam, Justin Wisely, Hassan Nasser","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11189-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>There has been a rising trend of outpatient bariatric surgery, particularly accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and outcomes of same-day discharge laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) using the MBSAQIP database.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>In this retrospective study, the MBSAQIP was queried for patients undergoing non-revisional LRYGB between 2020 and 2021. Two cohorts were established: same-day discharge (SDD; length of stay = 0 days) and next-day discharge (POD1; length of stay = 1 day), with the latter serving as a control group. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were employed to compare outcomes between cohorts.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A total of 48,408 patients underwent LRYGB, with 1,918 (4.0%) SDD and 46,490 (96.0%) POD1. The two cohorts were similar in mean age (SDD 44.2 ± 11.3 years vs POD1 44.0 ± 11.3 years; <i>p</i> = 0.61) and female sex (SDD 83.8% vs POD1 83.1%; <i>p</i> = 0.43). However, the POD1 cohort had a higher preoperative body mass index (45.4 ± 7.3 vs 44.9 ± 7.3 kg/m2; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Preoperative anticoagulation and obstructive sleep apnea were more prevalent in the POD1 group. There was no difference in overall 30-day overall complication rates (SDD 2.0% vs POD1 2.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.51), reintervention, reoperations, mortality, and emergency department visits between the two cohorts. Readmissions were lower in the SDD cohort (2.9% vs 4.0%; <i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas the need for outpatient intravenous hydration was higher in the SDD cohort (6.7% vs 3.6%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). This finding remained significant even after adjustment for confounders.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Same-day LRYGB is safe and feasible, with comparable complication rates to next-day discharge. Notably, SDD is associated with lower readmission rate and higher need for outpatient intravenous hydration, possibly reflecting rigorous bariatric protocols and thorough patient follow-up. Further investigations are warranted to elucidate the selection criteria and optimize postoperative care for outpatient LRYGB.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11189-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There has been a rising trend of outpatient bariatric surgery, particularly accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and outcomes of same-day discharge laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) using the MBSAQIP database.

Methods

In this retrospective study, the MBSAQIP was queried for patients undergoing non-revisional LRYGB between 2020 and 2021. Two cohorts were established: same-day discharge (SDD; length of stay = 0 days) and next-day discharge (POD1; length of stay = 1 day), with the latter serving as a control group. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were employed to compare outcomes between cohorts.

Results

A total of 48,408 patients underwent LRYGB, with 1,918 (4.0%) SDD and 46,490 (96.0%) POD1. The two cohorts were similar in mean age (SDD 44.2 ± 11.3 years vs POD1 44.0 ± 11.3 years; p = 0.61) and female sex (SDD 83.8% vs POD1 83.1%; p = 0.43). However, the POD1 cohort had a higher preoperative body mass index (45.4 ± 7.3 vs 44.9 ± 7.3 kg/m2; p < 0.01). Preoperative anticoagulation and obstructive sleep apnea were more prevalent in the POD1 group. There was no difference in overall 30-day overall complication rates (SDD 2.0% vs POD1 2.3%; p = 0.51), reintervention, reoperations, mortality, and emergency department visits between the two cohorts. Readmissions were lower in the SDD cohort (2.9% vs 4.0%; p = 0.02), whereas the need for outpatient intravenous hydration was higher in the SDD cohort (6.7% vs 3.6%; p < 0.01). This finding remained significant even after adjustment for confounders.

Conclusion

Same-day LRYGB is safe and feasible, with comparable complication rates to next-day discharge. Notably, SDD is associated with lower readmission rate and higher need for outpatient intravenous hydration, possibly reflecting rigorous bariatric protocols and thorough patient follow-up. Further investigations are warranted to elucidate the selection criteria and optimize postoperative care for outpatient LRYGB.

Graphical abstract

Abstract Image

使用 MBSAQIP 数据库对当天出院的腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的围手术期结果进行分析
背景门诊减肥手术呈上升趋势,尤其是 COVID-19 的流行加速了这一趋势。本研究旨在利用 MBSAQIP 数据库评估当日出院腹腔镜鲁-恩-Y 胃旁路术(LRYGB)的安全性和疗效。方法在这项回顾性研究中,我们查询了 MBSAQIP 在 2020 年至 2021 年期间接受非翻修 LRYGB 手术的患者。建立了两个队列:当日出院组(SDD;住院时间=0天)和次日出院组(POD1;住院时间=1天),后者作为对照组。结果共有 48,408 名患者接受了 LRYGB 术,其中 1,918 人(4.0%)接受了 SDD 术,46,490 人(96.0%)接受了 POD1 术。两组患者的平均年龄(SDD 44.2 ± 11.3 岁 vs POD1 44.0 ± 11.3 岁;P = 0.61)和女性性别(SDD 83.8% vs POD1 83.1%;P = 0.43)相似。然而,POD1 组群的术前体重指数更高(45.4 ± 7.3 vs 44.9 ± 7.3 kg/m2;p < 0.01)。POD1 组术前抗凝和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的发生率更高。两组患者的 30 天总体并发症发生率(SDD 2.0% vs POD1 2.3%; p = 0.51)、再介入、再手术、死亡率和急诊就诊率均无差异。SDD 组群的再入院率较低(2.9% vs 4.0%;p = 0.02),而 SDD 组群的门诊静脉补液需求较高(6.7% vs 3.6%;p <0.01)。结论当日 LRYGB 安全可行,并发症发生率与次日出院者相当。值得注意的是,SDD 与较低的再入院率和较高的门诊静脉补液需求相关,这可能反映了严格的减肥方案和对患者的全面随访。有必要进行进一步研究,以阐明门诊 LRYGB 的选择标准并优化术后护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信