Testing the thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich power spectrum of a halo model using hydrodynamical simulations

Emma Ayçoberry, Pranjal R. S., Karim Benabed, Yohan Dubois, Elisabeth Krause, Tim Eifler
{"title":"Testing the thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich power spectrum of a halo model using hydrodynamical simulations","authors":"Emma Ayçoberry, Pranjal R. S., Karim Benabed, Yohan Dubois, Elisabeth Krause, Tim Eifler","doi":"arxiv-2409.11472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statistical properties of LSS serve as powerful tools to constrain the\ncosmological properties of our Universe. Tracing the gas pressure, the tSZ\neffect is a biased probe of mass distribution and can be used to test the\nphysics of feedback or cosmological models. Therefore, it is crucial to develop\nrobust modeling of hot gas pressure for applications to tSZ surveys. Since gas\ncollapses into bound structures, it is expected that most of the tSZ signal is\nwithin halos produced by cosmic accretion shocks. Hence, simple empirical halo\nmodels can be used to predict the tSZ power spectra. In this study, we employed\nthe HMx halo model to compare the tSZ power spectra with those of several\nhydrodynamical simulations: the Horizon suite and the Magneticum simulation. We\nexamined various contributions to the tSZ power spectrum across different\nredshifts, including the one- and two-halo term decomposition, the amount of\nbound gas, the importance of different masses and the electron pressure\nprofiles. Our comparison of the tSZ power spectrum reveals discrepancies that\nincrease with redshift. We find a 20% to 50% difference between the measured\nand predicted tSZ angular power spectrum over the multipole range\n$\\ell=10^3-10^4$. Our analysis reveals that these differences are driven by the\nexcess of power in the predicted two-halo term at low k and in the one-halo\nterm at high k. At higher redshifts (z~3), simulations indicate that more power\ncomes from outside the virial radius than from inside suggesting a limitation\nin the applicability of the halo model. We observe differences in the pressure\nprofiles, despite the fair level of agreement on the tSZ power spectrum at low\nredshift with the default calibration of the halo model. In conclusion, our\nstudy suggests that the properties of the halo model need to be carefully\ncontrolled against real or mock data to be proven useful for cosmological\npurposes.","PeriodicalId":501207,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics","volume":"214 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statistical properties of LSS serve as powerful tools to constrain the cosmological properties of our Universe. Tracing the gas pressure, the tSZ effect is a biased probe of mass distribution and can be used to test the physics of feedback or cosmological models. Therefore, it is crucial to develop robust modeling of hot gas pressure for applications to tSZ surveys. Since gas collapses into bound structures, it is expected that most of the tSZ signal is within halos produced by cosmic accretion shocks. Hence, simple empirical halo models can be used to predict the tSZ power spectra. In this study, we employed the HMx halo model to compare the tSZ power spectra with those of several hydrodynamical simulations: the Horizon suite and the Magneticum simulation. We examined various contributions to the tSZ power spectrum across different redshifts, including the one- and two-halo term decomposition, the amount of bound gas, the importance of different masses and the electron pressure profiles. Our comparison of the tSZ power spectrum reveals discrepancies that increase with redshift. We find a 20% to 50% difference between the measured and predicted tSZ angular power spectrum over the multipole range $\ell=10^3-10^4$. Our analysis reveals that these differences are driven by the excess of power in the predicted two-halo term at low k and in the one-halo term at high k. At higher redshifts (z~3), simulations indicate that more power comes from outside the virial radius than from inside suggesting a limitation in the applicability of the halo model. We observe differences in the pressure profiles, despite the fair level of agreement on the tSZ power spectrum at low redshift with the default calibration of the halo model. In conclusion, our study suggests that the properties of the halo model need to be carefully controlled against real or mock data to be proven useful for cosmological purposes.
利用流体力学模拟测试光环模型的热苏尼耶夫-泽尔多维奇功率谱
LSS的统计特性是约束宇宙学特性的有力工具。追踪气体压力,tSZ效应是质量分布的一个有偏差的探测器,可以用来测试反馈物理学或宇宙学模型。因此,为应用于 tSZ 勘测,建立可靠的热气体压力模型至关重要。由于气体坍缩到束缚结构中,预计大部分 tSZ 信号都在宇宙吸积冲击产生的光晕中。因此,可以使用简单的经验光晕模型来预测tSZ功率谱。在这项研究中,我们使用了HMx光环模型来比较tSZ功率谱与几种流体力学模拟的功率谱:Horizon套件和Magneticum模拟。我们研究了不同移位时对tSZ功率谱的各种贡献,包括一晕和二晕项分解、束缚气体量、不同质量的重要性以及电子压力曲线。我们对tSZ功率谱的比较发现,差异随着红移的增加而增大。我们发现在多极范围$ell=10^3-10^4$内,测量的和预测的tSZ角功率谱相差20%到50%。在更高的红移(z~3)下,模拟结果表明,来自virial半径外的功率比来自virial半径内的功率大,这表明光环模型的适用性受到了限制。尽管低红移时的 tSZ 功率谱与光环模型的默认校准结果相当一致,但我们还是观察到了压力谱的差异。总之,我们的研究表明,光环模型的特性需要与真实或模拟数据进行仔细对照,才能被证明对宇宙学有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信