Miscegenation Madness: Interracial Intimacy and the Politics of ‘Purity’ in Twentieth-Century South Africa

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 ETHNIC STUDIES
Sebastian Jackson
{"title":"Miscegenation Madness: Interracial Intimacy and the Politics of ‘Purity’ in Twentieth-Century South Africa","authors":"Sebastian Jackson","doi":"10.1017/s1742058x24000080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this article, I examine how the fear of miscegenation developed as a <span>raison d’être</span> for the construction and maintenance of apartheid. I argue that despite its efficacy at reproducing racial-caste formations, miscegenation taboo ultimately undermined its own hegemonic mythology by constructing contradictory erotic desires and subjectivities which could neither be governed nor contained. I consider how miscegenation fears and fantasies were debated in public discourse, enacted into law, institutionalized through draconian policing and punishment practices, culturally entrenched, yet negotiated and resisted through everyday intimacies. While crime statistics show that most incidences of interracial sex involved White men and women of color, the perceived threat to “White purity” was generally represented through images of White women—<span>volks</span>-mothers and daughters—in the Afrikaner nationalist iconography. White women’s wombs symbolized the future of “Whiteness.” This article offers a critique of the prevailing South African “exceptionalism” paradigm in apartheid studies. Detailed analyses of government commission reports (1939, 1984, 1985) and parliamentary debate records (1949) reveal considerable American influence on South Africa’s “petty apartheid” laws, and especially the Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act (1949) and Immorality Amendment Act (1950). While these “cornerstone” policies of apartheid developed from local socio-political conflicts and economic tensions, they were always entangled in global racial formations, rooted in trans-oceanic histories of slavery, dispossession, and segregation. This historical anthropological study of race/sex taboo builds on interdisciplinary literatures in colonial history, sociology, postcolonial studies, literary theory, art history, cultural studies, feminist theory, queer studies, and critical race theory.</p>","PeriodicalId":47158,"journal":{"name":"Du Bois Review-Social Science Research on Race","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Du Bois Review-Social Science Research on Race","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742058x24000080","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, I examine how the fear of miscegenation developed as a raison d’être for the construction and maintenance of apartheid. I argue that despite its efficacy at reproducing racial-caste formations, miscegenation taboo ultimately undermined its own hegemonic mythology by constructing contradictory erotic desires and subjectivities which could neither be governed nor contained. I consider how miscegenation fears and fantasies were debated in public discourse, enacted into law, institutionalized through draconian policing and punishment practices, culturally entrenched, yet negotiated and resisted through everyday intimacies. While crime statistics show that most incidences of interracial sex involved White men and women of color, the perceived threat to “White purity” was generally represented through images of White women—volks-mothers and daughters—in the Afrikaner nationalist iconography. White women’s wombs symbolized the future of “Whiteness.” This article offers a critique of the prevailing South African “exceptionalism” paradigm in apartheid studies. Detailed analyses of government commission reports (1939, 1984, 1985) and parliamentary debate records (1949) reveal considerable American influence on South Africa’s “petty apartheid” laws, and especially the Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act (1949) and Immorality Amendment Act (1950). While these “cornerstone” policies of apartheid developed from local socio-political conflicts and economic tensions, they were always entangled in global racial formations, rooted in trans-oceanic histories of slavery, dispossession, and segregation. This historical anthropological study of race/sex taboo builds on interdisciplinary literatures in colonial history, sociology, postcolonial studies, literary theory, art history, cultural studies, feminist theory, queer studies, and critical race theory.

疯狂混血:二十世纪南非的种族间亲密关系与 "纯洁 "政治
在这篇文章中,我研究了对混血的恐惧是如何发展成为种族隔离制度建设和维持的存在理由的。我认为,尽管混血禁忌能够有效地复制种族-种姓形式,但它通过构建矛盾的色情欲望和主体性,最终破坏了自身的霸权神话,而这些欲望和主体性既无法被控制,也无法被遏制。我考虑的是,对混血的恐惧和幻想是如何在公共话语中被辩论、在法律中被颁布、通过严厉的治安和惩罚措施被制度化、在文化上根深蒂固,但又是如何通过日常亲密关系被协商和抵制的。虽然犯罪统计数据显示,大多数跨种族性行为都涉及白人男性和有色人种女性,但在非洲裔民族主义者的图标中,"白人纯洁性 "受到的威胁通常是通过白人女性--"沃尔克"(volks)--母亲和女儿的形象来体现的。白人妇女的子宫象征着 "白人 "的未来。本文对种族隔离研究中盛行的南非 "例外论 "范式进行了批判。对政府委员会报告(1939 年、1984 年、1985 年)和议会辩论记录(1949 年)的详细分析显示,美国对南非的 "小种族隔离 "法律,尤其是《禁止异族通婚法》(1949 年)和《不道德行为修正案》(1950 年)产生了相当大的影响。虽然这些种族隔离的 "基石 "政策是在当地社会政治冲突和经济紧张局势的基础上发展起来的,但它们始终与植根于跨洋奴隶制、剥夺财产和种族隔离历史的全球种族形态纠缠在一起。这项关于种族/性别禁忌的历史人类学研究以殖民史、社会学、后殖民研究、文学理论、艺术史、文化研究、女权主义理论、同性恋研究和批判性种族理论等跨学科文献为基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信