Usefulness of sudomotor function assessment in individuals with type-2 diabetes: A case–control study

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Banfantini Pikabe Lare, Jérémy Jost, Kossivi Apetse, Laurence Salle, Pierre Marie Preux, Agnon Balogou, Julien Magne
{"title":"Usefulness of sudomotor function assessment in individuals with type-2 diabetes: A case–control study","authors":"Banfantini Pikabe Lare, Jérémy Jost, Kossivi Apetse, Laurence Salle, Pierre Marie Preux, Agnon Balogou, Julien Magne","doi":"10.1007/s13410-024-01399-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Early screening for type 2 diabetes is crucial to prevent complications such as peripheral neuropathy and their detrimental effects on quality of life and morbidity. Sudomotor function assessment may play a pivotal role in this regard.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of sudomotor function assessment, derived from electrochemical skin conductance (ESC) measurement, for the diagnosis of diabetes in patients.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This case–control study was conducted at the University Hospital of Lomé in Togo and included 304 people with Diabetes and 475 control subjects. Sudomotor function was assessed in both groups using a single device (Sudoscan2, version SU2 01266). The ESC of the left and right hands and feet were measured in each subject and then averaged. A comprehensive examination was performed, and demographic, anthropometric, and clinical data were collected. Consent was obtained from all participants.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The study found that people with Diabetes were significantly older, had a higher body mass index (BMI), and were more frequently male than the control group (median and [interquartile]: 57 [48–65] vs. 41 [30–52] years, p &lt; 0.0001; 27 [24–31] vs. 25 [22–29] kg/m<sup>2</sup>, p = 0.0042; 28% vs. 14%, p &lt; 0.0001; respectively). Additionally, people with Diabetes had significantly lower averaged hands and feet ESC compared to the control group (hand ESC: 68 [58–75] vs. 57 [47–69] μS, p &lt; 0.0001 and foot ESC: 74 [66–80] vs. 62 [45–71], p &lt; 0.0001 respectively). Similar results were found in both men and women across all age groups. In multiple linear regression analysis, diabetes was found to be independently associated with lower ESC, even after adjusting for age, sex, and BMI. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the diagnosis of diabetes were 0.73 (0.68–0.77) and 0.76 (0.71–0.80) for averaged hand and foot ESC, respectively. The identified thresholds of ESC for diabetes detection were 56 μS (sensitivity = 83%, specificity = 34%) and 66 μS (sensitivity = 86%, specificity = 45%) for hands and feet ESC, respectively.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Sudomotor function is reduced in people with Diabetes, regardless of age, sex, and BMI. The ESC measurement has good sensitivity and may be useful in screening patients at risk of diabetes, potentially leading to earlier diagnosis. However, further investigation is required to determine the relevance of systematic ESC measurement in terms of management and risk stratification for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50328,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-024-01399-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Early screening for type 2 diabetes is crucial to prevent complications such as peripheral neuropathy and their detrimental effects on quality of life and morbidity. Sudomotor function assessment may play a pivotal role in this regard.

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of sudomotor function assessment, derived from electrochemical skin conductance (ESC) measurement, for the diagnosis of diabetes in patients.

Methods

This case–control study was conducted at the University Hospital of Lomé in Togo and included 304 people with Diabetes and 475 control subjects. Sudomotor function was assessed in both groups using a single device (Sudoscan2, version SU2 01266). The ESC of the left and right hands and feet were measured in each subject and then averaged. A comprehensive examination was performed, and demographic, anthropometric, and clinical data were collected. Consent was obtained from all participants.

Results

The study found that people with Diabetes were significantly older, had a higher body mass index (BMI), and were more frequently male than the control group (median and [interquartile]: 57 [48–65] vs. 41 [30–52] years, p < 0.0001; 27 [24–31] vs. 25 [22–29] kg/m2, p = 0.0042; 28% vs. 14%, p < 0.0001; respectively). Additionally, people with Diabetes had significantly lower averaged hands and feet ESC compared to the control group (hand ESC: 68 [58–75] vs. 57 [47–69] μS, p < 0.0001 and foot ESC: 74 [66–80] vs. 62 [45–71], p < 0.0001 respectively). Similar results were found in both men and women across all age groups. In multiple linear regression analysis, diabetes was found to be independently associated with lower ESC, even after adjusting for age, sex, and BMI. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the diagnosis of diabetes were 0.73 (0.68–0.77) and 0.76 (0.71–0.80) for averaged hand and foot ESC, respectively. The identified thresholds of ESC for diabetes detection were 56 μS (sensitivity = 83%, specificity = 34%) and 66 μS (sensitivity = 86%, specificity = 45%) for hands and feet ESC, respectively.

Conclusion

Sudomotor function is reduced in people with Diabetes, regardless of age, sex, and BMI. The ESC measurement has good sensitivity and may be useful in screening patients at risk of diabetes, potentially leading to earlier diagnosis. However, further investigation is required to determine the relevance of systematic ESC measurement in terms of management and risk stratification for these patients.

Abstract Image

对 2 型糖尿病患者进行泌尿运动功能评估的实用性:病例对照研究
背景2型糖尿病的早期筛查对于预防周围神经病变等并发症及其对生活质量和发病率的不利影响至关重要。本研究的目的是评估根据皮肤电化学电导(ESC)测量结果进行的舒张运动功能评估对糖尿病患者诊断的有用性。方法这项病例对照研究在多哥洛美大学医院进行,包括304名糖尿病患者和475名对照组受试者。使用单一设备(Sudoscan2,SU2 01266 版)对两组患者的数动功能进行评估。对每个受试者的左右手和脚的ESC进行测量,然后求取平均值。对受试者进行了全面检查,并收集了人口统计学、人体测量学和临床数据。结果研究发现,与对照组相比,糖尿病患者的年龄明显偏大,体重指数(BMI)较高,男性患者较多(中位数和[四分位间]:57 [48-65] vs. 57 [48-65] [四分位间]:57 [48-65] vs. 57 [48-65] [四分位间]):分别为:57 [48-65] 岁 vs. 41 [30-52] 岁,p < 0.0001;27 [24-31] kg/m2 vs. 25 [22-29] kg/m2,p = 0.0042;28% vs. 14%,p < 0.0001)。此外,与对照组相比,糖尿病患者的手部和足部ESC平均值明显较低(手部ESC:68 [58-75] vs. 57 [47-69] μS, p < 0.0001,足部ESC:74 [66-80] vs. 57 [47-69] μS, p < 0.0001:分别为 74 [66-80] vs. 62 [45-71],p < 0.0001)。在所有年龄组中,男性和女性的结果相似。在多元线性回归分析中发现,即使在调整了年龄、性别和体重指数后,糖尿病仍与较低的 ESC 值独立相关。就手部和足部ESC平均值而言,糖尿病诊断的接收器操作特征曲线下面积分别为0.73(0.68-0.77)和0.76(0.71-0.80)。手部和足部ESC检测糖尿病的阈值分别为56 μS(灵敏度=83%,特异度=34%)和66 μS(灵敏度=86%,特异度=45%)。ESC测量具有良好的灵敏度,可用于筛查有糖尿病风险的患者,并有可能导致早期诊断。不过,还需要进一步调查,以确定系统性的ESC测量在这些患者的管理和风险分层方面的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries is the official journal of Research Society for the Study of Diabetes in India. This is a peer reviewed journal and targets a readership consisting of clinicians, research workers, paramedical personnel, nutritionists and health care personnel working in the field of diabetes. Original research articles focusing on clinical and patient care issues including newer therapies and technologies as well as basic science issues in this field are considered for publication in the journal. Systematic reviews of interest to the above group of readers are also accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信