{"title":"Technical Anonymity and Employees’ Willingness to Speak Up: Influences of Voice Solicitation, General Timeliness, and Psychological Safety","authors":"Chun Liu, Qin Yuan, Jiang Luo","doi":"10.1177/08933189241284598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: In recent years, many enterprises have established anonymous online forums to encourage employees to speak up. However, questions remain regarding whether these anonymous communication channels work. This research explores how and when technical anonymity influences employees’ willingness to speak up.Design/methodology/approach: Via an experimental method (study 1), we investigated the effects of technical anonymity and the moderating effects of voice solicitation. Via an experimental method (study 2), we examined the effects of technical anonymity and the moderating effects of time delay.Findings: The results of two studies consistently indicate that employees are more willing to speak up in the anonymous condition than in the nonanonymous condition and that psychological safety mediates the relationship between technical anonymity and employees’ willingness to speak up. In addition, we identify the boundary conditions of the effects of technical anonymity. In the prohibitive voice solicitation condition and in the delay condition, the above effects exist.Originality/value: First, we contribute to the literature on organizational media affordance by examining the effects of the anonymity affordance. Second, we contribute to the literature on organizational anonymity communication by exploring the impacts of technical anonymity on employees’ willingness to speak up in the workplace. Third, we extend the literature on employee voice by theorizing and demonstrating the moderating roles of two novel variables.","PeriodicalId":47743,"journal":{"name":"Management Communication Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Communication Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189241284598","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: In recent years, many enterprises have established anonymous online forums to encourage employees to speak up. However, questions remain regarding whether these anonymous communication channels work. This research explores how and when technical anonymity influences employees’ willingness to speak up.Design/methodology/approach: Via an experimental method (study 1), we investigated the effects of technical anonymity and the moderating effects of voice solicitation. Via an experimental method (study 2), we examined the effects of technical anonymity and the moderating effects of time delay.Findings: The results of two studies consistently indicate that employees are more willing to speak up in the anonymous condition than in the nonanonymous condition and that psychological safety mediates the relationship between technical anonymity and employees’ willingness to speak up. In addition, we identify the boundary conditions of the effects of technical anonymity. In the prohibitive voice solicitation condition and in the delay condition, the above effects exist.Originality/value: First, we contribute to the literature on organizational media affordance by examining the effects of the anonymity affordance. Second, we contribute to the literature on organizational anonymity communication by exploring the impacts of technical anonymity on employees’ willingness to speak up in the workplace. Third, we extend the literature on employee voice by theorizing and demonstrating the moderating roles of two novel variables.
期刊介绍:
Management Communication Quarterly presents conceptually rigorous, empirically-driven, and practice-relevant research from across the organizational and management communication fields and has strong appeal across all disciplines concerned with organizational studies and the management sciences. Authors are encouraged to submit original theoretical and empirical manuscripts from a wide variety of methodological perspectives covering such areas as management, communication, organizational studies, organizational behavior and HRM, organizational theory and strategy, critical management studies, leadership, information systems, knowledge and innovation, globalization and international management, corporate communication, and cultural and intercultural studies.