{"title":"Epistemic inequality in the digital era: Unpacking biases in digital mental health","authors":"Ana Tomičić, Marija Adela Gjorgjioska","doi":"10.1177/09593543241279131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines biases in digital mental health and their impact on technical, social, and political systems. Rising health expenditures and the politics of public health have increased individuals’ responsibility for managing their own health. Global e-health initiatives promise mental health metrics through digital technologies. However, obstacles such as neo-colonial workings of the global economy, embedded biases in technology, and exclusion of psychological therapeutic approaches hinder the digital shift in mental health. This article analyzes the ecosystem of digital mental health technologies, challenging assumptions about psychological normality and algorithmic bias. It explores issues in individualized digital healthcare, cultural biases in psychological assessments, and disciplinary biases in psychology and psychotherapy integrated into digital health tools. By exposing biases and power dynamics, the article emphasizes the need for ethical considerations and offers insights into the potentials and limitations of mental health technologies.","PeriodicalId":47640,"journal":{"name":"Theory & Psychology","volume":"202 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory & Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543241279131","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article examines biases in digital mental health and their impact on technical, social, and political systems. Rising health expenditures and the politics of public health have increased individuals’ responsibility for managing their own health. Global e-health initiatives promise mental health metrics through digital technologies. However, obstacles such as neo-colonial workings of the global economy, embedded biases in technology, and exclusion of psychological therapeutic approaches hinder the digital shift in mental health. This article analyzes the ecosystem of digital mental health technologies, challenging assumptions about psychological normality and algorithmic bias. It explores issues in individualized digital healthcare, cultural biases in psychological assessments, and disciplinary biases in psychology and psychotherapy integrated into digital health tools. By exposing biases and power dynamics, the article emphasizes the need for ethical considerations and offers insights into the potentials and limitations of mental health technologies.
期刊介绍:
Theory & Psychology is a fully peer reviewed forum for theoretical and meta-theoretical analysis in psychology. It focuses on the emergent themes at the centre of contemporary psychological debate. Its principal aim is to foster theoretical dialogue and innovation within the discipline, serving an integrative role for a wide psychological audience. Theory & Psychology publishes scholarly and expository papers which explore significant theoretical developments within and across such specific sub-areas as: cognitive, social, personality, developmental, clinical, perceptual or biological psychology.