Partial Ordering Bayesian Logistic Regression Model for Phase I Combination Trials and Computationally Efficient Approach to Operational Prior Specification
{"title":"Partial Ordering Bayesian Logistic Regression Model for Phase I Combination Trials and Computationally Efficient Approach to Operational Prior Specification","authors":"Weishi Chen, Pavel Mozgunov","doi":"arxiv-2409.10352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent years have seen increased interest in combining drug agents and/or\nschedules. Several methods for Phase I combination-escalation trials are\nproposed, among which, the partial ordering continual reassessment method\n(POCRM) gained great attention for its simplicity and good operational\ncharacteristics. However, the one-parameter nature of the POCRM makes it\nrestrictive in more complicated settings such as the inclusion of a control\ngroup. This paper proposes a Bayesian partial ordering logistic model (POBLRM),\nwhich combines partial ordering and the more flexible (than CRM) two-parameter\nlogistic model. Simulation studies show that the POBLRM performs similarly as\nthe POCRM in non-randomised settings. When patients are randomised between the\nexperimental dose-combinations and a control, performance is drastically\nimproved. Most designs require specifying hyper-parameters, often chosen from\nstatistical considerations (operational prior). The conventional \"grid search''\ncalibration approach requires large simulations, which are computationally\ncostly. A novel \"cyclic calibration\" has been proposed to reduce the\ncomputation from multiplicative to additive. Furthermore, calibration processes\nshould consider wide ranges of scenarios of true toxicity probabilities to\navoid bias. A method to reduce scenarios based on scenario-complexities is\nsuggested. This can reduce the computation by more than 500 folds while\nremaining operational characteristics similar to the grid search.","PeriodicalId":501425,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Methodology","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.10352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recent years have seen increased interest in combining drug agents and/or
schedules. Several methods for Phase I combination-escalation trials are
proposed, among which, the partial ordering continual reassessment method
(POCRM) gained great attention for its simplicity and good operational
characteristics. However, the one-parameter nature of the POCRM makes it
restrictive in more complicated settings such as the inclusion of a control
group. This paper proposes a Bayesian partial ordering logistic model (POBLRM),
which combines partial ordering and the more flexible (than CRM) two-parameter
logistic model. Simulation studies show that the POBLRM performs similarly as
the POCRM in non-randomised settings. When patients are randomised between the
experimental dose-combinations and a control, performance is drastically
improved. Most designs require specifying hyper-parameters, often chosen from
statistical considerations (operational prior). The conventional "grid search''
calibration approach requires large simulations, which are computationally
costly. A novel "cyclic calibration" has been proposed to reduce the
computation from multiplicative to additive. Furthermore, calibration processes
should consider wide ranges of scenarios of true toxicity probabilities to
avoid bias. A method to reduce scenarios based on scenario-complexities is
suggested. This can reduce the computation by more than 500 folds while
remaining operational characteristics similar to the grid search.