Influence of Labyrinth Side Weir Shape Modification on the Hydrodynamic Performance: Experimental and Numerical Study

IF 2.9 4区 综合性期刊 Q1 Multidisciplinary
Bshkoj S. Hussein, Shaker A. Jalil
{"title":"Influence of Labyrinth Side Weir Shape Modification on the Hydrodynamic Performance: Experimental and Numerical Study","authors":"Bshkoj S. Hussein, Shaker A. Jalil","doi":"10.1007/s13369-024-09563-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Controlling water levels in main channels by constructing side weirs can be influenced by geometric modification. Therefore, proposed geometric changes to the crest of the traditional sharp-crested weir are tested to study the hydrodynamic performance of these weirs. Triangular labyrinth side weir with and without a ramp, curved wing crest and 3 different diameters of circular crest were investigated experimentally and numerically. All the tested shapes have three inclusion angles (<i>θ</i> = 30, 45, and 60°), and three heights (0.1, 0.15, 0.2 m). The fluid volume (VOF) and the turbulence renormalization (RNG k-ϵ) method were selected for simulation and verifying the free surface flow along the center line and beside the weir in the main channel and measuring the velocity at certain cross sectionssections. The smaller inclusion angle between the walls (<i>θ</i> = 30°) performs better in discharging side flow and has a higher discharge coefficient than others. Upon comparison with a traditional labyrinth side weir, a modified side weir with a curved wing and a smaller circular crest diameter increases discharge coefficient (Cd) by about 20.7% and 6.43%, respectively, while its value reduced with the increase of crest diameter and its performance decreased about 17% by increasing the weir crest diameter from 2.5 to 5 cm. However, no improvements have been visualized for adding an upstream ramp. Moreover, in a smaller inclusion angle, the diverting streamline width of flow was obtained to be 0.81 and 0.65 times the main channel width for the modified weir with a curved wing and triangular labyrinth side weir, respectively. In addition, the highest separation zone width downstream of the parent channel for inclusion angle (30°) was observed to be about 2.5 and 1.8 times its width of angle (60°) for curved wing and traditional labyrinth weir, respectively. The discharge coefficient of the curved wing was 3 times the normal rectangular side weir coefficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":8109,"journal":{"name":"Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-09563-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Controlling water levels in main channels by constructing side weirs can be influenced by geometric modification. Therefore, proposed geometric changes to the crest of the traditional sharp-crested weir are tested to study the hydrodynamic performance of these weirs. Triangular labyrinth side weir with and without a ramp, curved wing crest and 3 different diameters of circular crest were investigated experimentally and numerically. All the tested shapes have three inclusion angles (θ = 30, 45, and 60°), and three heights (0.1, 0.15, 0.2 m). The fluid volume (VOF) and the turbulence renormalization (RNG k-ϵ) method were selected for simulation and verifying the free surface flow along the center line and beside the weir in the main channel and measuring the velocity at certain cross sectionssections. The smaller inclusion angle between the walls (θ = 30°) performs better in discharging side flow and has a higher discharge coefficient than others. Upon comparison with a traditional labyrinth side weir, a modified side weir with a curved wing and a smaller circular crest diameter increases discharge coefficient (Cd) by about 20.7% and 6.43%, respectively, while its value reduced with the increase of crest diameter and its performance decreased about 17% by increasing the weir crest diameter from 2.5 to 5 cm. However, no improvements have been visualized for adding an upstream ramp. Moreover, in a smaller inclusion angle, the diverting streamline width of flow was obtained to be 0.81 and 0.65 times the main channel width for the modified weir with a curved wing and triangular labyrinth side weir, respectively. In addition, the highest separation zone width downstream of the parent channel for inclusion angle (30°) was observed to be about 2.5 and 1.8 times its width of angle (60°) for curved wing and traditional labyrinth weir, respectively. The discharge coefficient of the curved wing was 3 times the normal rectangular side weir coefficient.

Abstract Image

迷宫侧堰形状修改对水动力性能的影响:实验和数值研究
通过修建边堰来控制主航道的水位可能会受到几何改造的影响。因此,建议对传统尖顶堰的堰顶进行几何改造,以研究这些堰的水动力性能。实验和数值研究了带斜坡和不带斜坡的三角形迷宫侧堰、弯曲翼形堰顶和 3 种不同直径的圆形堰顶。所有测试形状都有三个包容角(θ = 30、45 和 60°)和三个高度(0.1、0.15 和 0.2 米)。选用流体体积法(VOF)和湍流重正化法(RNG k-ϵ)模拟和验证了主航道中心线和堰旁的自由表面流,并测量了某些断面的流速。与其他方法相比,较小的堰壁夹角(θ = 30°)能更好地排出侧流,排流系数也更高。与传统的迷宫式侧堰相比,带有弧形翼和较小圆形堰顶直径的改进型侧堰的排泄系数(Cd)分别提高了约 20.7% 和 6.43%,而其值则随着堰顶直径的增大而降低,当堰顶直径从 2.5 厘米增大到 5 厘米时,其性能降低了约 17%。但是,增加上游斜坡后,性能没有明显改善。此外,在较小的包容角下,带弯翼和三角迷宫侧堰的改良堰的分流流线宽度分别为主河道宽度的 0.81 倍和 0.65 倍。此外,在母河道下游观察到的最大分离区宽度(包容角 30°)分别是曲翼堰和传统迷宫堰包容角(60°)宽度的 2.5 倍和 1.8 倍。曲翼堰的排流系数是普通矩形边堰系数的 3 倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM) partnered with Springer to publish the Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (AJSE). AJSE, which has been published by KFUPM since 1975, is a recognized national, regional and international journal that provides a great opportunity for the dissemination of research advances from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, MENA and the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信