Differences in Timely Goals of Care Discussions in Nursing Homes Among Black Residents

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jung A. Kang, Andrew W. Dick, Laurent G. Glance, Lara Dhingra, Patricia W. Stone
{"title":"Differences in Timely Goals of Care Discussions in Nursing Homes Among Black Residents","authors":"Jung A. Kang, Andrew W. Dick, Laurent G. Glance, Lara Dhingra, Patricia W. Stone","doi":"10.1177/10499091241284073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundIn the United States, disparities persist in end-of-life care outcomes between Black and White nursing home (NH) residents, particularly concerning infection-related management. Timely goals of care (TGOC) discussions are crucial for improving end-of-life outcomes but exhibit racial variations within NHs that are not well understood.ObjectivesExamine the association between the proportion of Black residents within NHs and TGOC discussion related to infection management.DesignA national analysis of palliative care survey data from NHs with the Minimum Dataset 3.0 and administrative data.Setting/Subjects892 NHs representing a weighted sample of 14,981 facilities.MeasurmentsTGOC discussions related to infection management were quantified using an index score from the palliative care survey (range: 0-18). Multivariable analyses assessed the association between the proportion of Black residents (≤2%, 2.1%–15%, >15%) and TGOC index scores.ResultsThe majority of NHs were for-profit, chain-affiliated, urban facilities with fewer than 100 beds, serving both Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries. In stratified analyses, NHs with 2.1%–15% (−0.97 score; 95%CI -1.86, −0.07; P < .05) and 15% or more Black residents (−3.86 score; 95%CI -6.62, −1.10; P < .01) showed lower TGOC index scores compared to NHs with 2% or fewer Black residents in the West. NHs with 2.1%–15% Black residents had 1.29 lower TGOC index scores compared to NHs with 2% or fewer Black residents (95%CI -2.51, −0.07; P < .05) in the Northeast.ConclusionsTGOC discussions in US NHs are influenced by the proportion of Black residents, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to address regional disparities and improve end-of-life care equity.","PeriodicalId":50810,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241284073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundIn the United States, disparities persist in end-of-life care outcomes between Black and White nursing home (NH) residents, particularly concerning infection-related management. Timely goals of care (TGOC) discussions are crucial for improving end-of-life outcomes but exhibit racial variations within NHs that are not well understood.ObjectivesExamine the association between the proportion of Black residents within NHs and TGOC discussion related to infection management.DesignA national analysis of palliative care survey data from NHs with the Minimum Dataset 3.0 and administrative data.Setting/Subjects892 NHs representing a weighted sample of 14,981 facilities.MeasurmentsTGOC discussions related to infection management were quantified using an index score from the palliative care survey (range: 0-18). Multivariable analyses assessed the association between the proportion of Black residents (≤2%, 2.1%–15%, >15%) and TGOC index scores.ResultsThe majority of NHs were for-profit, chain-affiliated, urban facilities with fewer than 100 beds, serving both Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries. In stratified analyses, NHs with 2.1%–15% (−0.97 score; 95%CI -1.86, −0.07; P < .05) and 15% or more Black residents (−3.86 score; 95%CI -6.62, −1.10; P < .01) showed lower TGOC index scores compared to NHs with 2% or fewer Black residents in the West. NHs with 2.1%–15% Black residents had 1.29 lower TGOC index scores compared to NHs with 2% or fewer Black residents (95%CI -2.51, −0.07; P < .05) in the Northeast.ConclusionsTGOC discussions in US NHs are influenced by the proportion of Black residents, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to address regional disparities and improve end-of-life care equity.
养老院中黑人住院者及时讨论护理目标的差异
背景在美国,黑人和白人养老院(NH)居民之间在临终关怀结果方面仍然存在差异,尤其是在与感染相关的管理方面。及时进行护理目标(TGOC)讨论对于改善临终关怀结果至关重要,但在养老院中却表现出种族差异,而这种差异尚未得到很好的了解。研究目的 探讨养老院中黑人居民的比例与有关感染管理的TGOC讨论之间的关系。设计利用最小数据集 3.0 和行政管理数据对来自养老院的姑息关怀调查数据进行全国性分析。多变量分析评估了黑人居民比例(≤2%,2.1%-15%,>15%)与TGOC指数得分之间的关系。结果大多数疗养院都是营利性的、隶属于连锁机构的城市设施,床位数少于100张,同时为医疗保险和医疗补助受益人提供服务。在分层分析中,黑人居民占 2.1%-15% (-0.97 score; 95%CI -1.86, -0.07; P < .05) 和 15% 或以上 (-3.86 score; 95%CI -6.62, -1.10; P < .01) 的 NHs 与西部黑人居民占 2% 或以下的 NHs 相比,TGOC 指数得分较低。结论美国公立医疗机构的 TGOC 讨论受黑人居民比例的影响,这突出表明需要采取有针对性的干预措施来解决地区差异并改善临终关怀的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
169
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine (AJHPM) is a peer-reviewed journal, published eight times a year. In 30 years of publication, AJHPM has highlighted the interdisciplinary team approach to hospice and palliative medicine as related to the care of the patient and family. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信