Meta‐analysis of cardiac magnetic resonance in prognosticating left ventricular function in peripartum cardiomyopathy

Abstract

AimsPeripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) may result in a number of detrimental adverse cardiovascular events, notably persistent left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) reduction or even mortality. Imaging parameters on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and their prognostic implications have rarely been perused in PPCM. We aimed to describe CMR's prognostic value in predicting poor left ventricular (LV) function recovery using late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and T2‐weighted or T2 mapping.Methods and resultsPubMed, Europe PMC, and ScienceDirect were screened for studies on late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and myocardial oedema using CMR and PPCM. The outcome of interest was poor LV function recovery, with a follow‐up period of at least 6 months. Comparisons between groups with the presence of LGE, myocardial oedema, and recovered against non‐recovered patients were pooled. A random‐effects model was employed to calculate the effect size. All pooled results were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The area under the curve (AUC) was generated to test overall prognostic accuracy. Six cohort studies with 162 patients were included. The mean age of participants in this study was 30.6 years, and the majority of patients were diagnosed with PPCM after delivery. LGE was associated with a higher risk of poor LV function recovery, particularly when conducted at a later stage of disease (≥2.8 months) [RR = 2.83 (95% CI = 1.25–6.40); P = 0.001]. On the contrary, CMR conducted early (<2.8 months) exhibited a greater predictive value for myocardial oedema perceived by T2 mapping [RR = 3.44 (95% CI = 1.04–11.34); P = 0.043]. Diagnostic‐test accuracy meta‐analysis revealed that LGE had a sensitivity of 73% (95% CI, 56–85%), specificity of 79% (95% CI, 45–95%), and AUC of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.75–0.82) in predicting poor LV recovery when performed in the later phase, whereas significant myocardial oedema in those with non‐recovered LV function had a sensitivity of 12% (95% CI, 2–52%), specificity of 68% (95% CI, 39–88%), and AUC of 0.40 (95% CI, 0.36–0.44) while undertaken in the latter phase. Our findings support the notion that inflammation plays a significant role in PPCM and that alterations to tissue composition occur in a time‐dependent manner.ConclusionsContrast‐enhanced CMR can be utilized as an adjunct examination in post‐partum PPCM patients to stratify the risk of poor LV function recovery while conducted at a suitable point in time.