Towards Fair RAG: On the Impact of Fair Ranking in Retrieval-Augmented Generation

To Eun Kim, Fernando Diaz
{"title":"Towards Fair RAG: On the Impact of Fair Ranking in Retrieval-Augmented Generation","authors":"To Eun Kim, Fernando Diaz","doi":"arxiv-2409.11598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many language models now enhance their responses with retrieval capabilities,\nleading to the widespread adoption of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)\nsystems. However, despite retrieval being a core component of RAG, much of the\nresearch in this area overlooks the extensive body of work on fair ranking,\nneglecting the importance of considering all stakeholders involved. This paper\npresents the first systematic evaluation of RAG systems integrated with fair\nrankings. We focus specifically on measuring the fair exposure of each relevant\nitem across the rankings utilized by RAG systems (i.e., item-side fairness),\naiming to promote equitable growth for relevant item providers. To gain a deep\nunderstanding of the relationship between item-fairness, ranking quality, and\ngeneration quality in the context of RAG, we analyze nine different RAG systems\nthat incorporate fair rankings across seven distinct datasets. Our findings\nindicate that RAG systems with fair rankings can maintain a high level of\ngeneration quality and, in many cases, even outperform traditional RAG systems,\ndespite the general trend of a tradeoff between ensuring fairness and\nmaintaining system-effectiveness. We believe our insights lay the groundwork\nfor responsible and equitable RAG systems and open new avenues for future\nresearch. We publicly release our codebase and dataset at\nhttps://github.com/kimdanny/Fair-RAG.","PeriodicalId":501281,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Information Retrieval","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Information Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many language models now enhance their responses with retrieval capabilities, leading to the widespread adoption of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. However, despite retrieval being a core component of RAG, much of the research in this area overlooks the extensive body of work on fair ranking, neglecting the importance of considering all stakeholders involved. This paper presents the first systematic evaluation of RAG systems integrated with fair rankings. We focus specifically on measuring the fair exposure of each relevant item across the rankings utilized by RAG systems (i.e., item-side fairness), aiming to promote equitable growth for relevant item providers. To gain a deep understanding of the relationship between item-fairness, ranking quality, and generation quality in the context of RAG, we analyze nine different RAG systems that incorporate fair rankings across seven distinct datasets. Our findings indicate that RAG systems with fair rankings can maintain a high level of generation quality and, in many cases, even outperform traditional RAG systems, despite the general trend of a tradeoff between ensuring fairness and maintaining system-effectiveness. We believe our insights lay the groundwork for responsible and equitable RAG systems and open new avenues for future research. We publicly release our codebase and dataset at https://github.com/kimdanny/Fair-RAG.
走向公平的 RAG:论检索增强生成中公平排序的影响
现在,许多语言模型都通过检索功能来增强其响应能力,这导致了检索增强生成系统(RAG)的广泛采用。然而,尽管检索是 RAG 的核心组成部分,该领域的许多研究却忽视了公平排名方面的大量工作,忽略了考虑所有利益相关者的重要性。本文首次系统地评估了与公平排名相结合的 RAG 系统。我们特别关注测量每个相关项目在 RAG 系统使用的排名中的公平曝光率(即项目方公平性),旨在促进相关项目提供者的公平增长。为了深入理解 RAG 中项目公平性、排名质量和生成质量之间的关系,我们分析了七个不同数据集中九种不同的 RAG 系统,这些系统都包含公平排名。我们的研究结果表明,具有公平排名的 RAG 系统可以保持较高的生成质量,在很多情况下甚至优于传统的 RAG 系统,尽管在确保公平性和保持系统有效性之间存在权衡的普遍趋势。我们相信,我们的见解为负责任和公平的 RAG 系统奠定了基础,并为未来的研究开辟了新途径。我们公开发布了我们的代码库和数据集,网址是:https://github.com/kimdanny/Fair-RAG。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信