Towards a more realistic estimation of urban land take by combining cadastral parcels and building footprints

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Apostolos Lagarias, Demetris Stathakis
{"title":"Towards a more realistic estimation of urban land take by combining cadastral parcels and building footprints","authors":"Apostolos Lagarias, Demetris Stathakis","doi":"10.1177/23998083241282092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite its importance as a research issue, a widely accepted methodology of estimating land take resulting from urbanization has not yet been reached. Accurate geospatial datasets are currently available at a European and global level; however, different methods of quantifying urban land take could lead to diverse outputs, potentially resulting in underestimation. This can be alarming as encroaching urban sprawl is emerging as a major environmental challenge by destroying natural habitats, consuming productive agricultural land, and contributing to climate change by increasing energy demands. To address this knowledge gap, we propose an estimation of urban land take that combines cadastral parcels and building footprints. Land parcels can be considered as a suitable minimum mapping unit as they are directly related to the spatial level where economic decisions on land use conversion are made. The proposed geospatial method is compared to methods that depend on datasets of High Resolution Layer Imperviousness, Global Building Footprints (alone), Corine Land Cover, Urban Atlas, and Global Human Settlement Layer. The method is exemplified in case studies in Greece, specifically: (a) two islands of the South Aegean Region (Mykonos and Thera), that are heavily impacted by tourism development and sprawl and (b) a peri-urban zone (Thermaikos-Michaniona) within the metropolitan area of Thessaloniki, impacted by intense suburbanization. Results show that urban land consumes important shares of available land since the mid-20th century, this fact highlighting the dynamic encroachment of urban development. Calculation shows that other methods could underestimate urbanized areas by up to 80%–90%. In the discussion section, the advantages of shifting the focus from the pixel to the parcel are further justified, while explicit links to spatial planning policies for sprawl containment are drawn. Such policies could be informed by more realistic estimations of urban land take, in order to proceed with strategic and regulatory measures to support the ‘no net land take’ policy of Europe.","PeriodicalId":11863,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083241282092","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite its importance as a research issue, a widely accepted methodology of estimating land take resulting from urbanization has not yet been reached. Accurate geospatial datasets are currently available at a European and global level; however, different methods of quantifying urban land take could lead to diverse outputs, potentially resulting in underestimation. This can be alarming as encroaching urban sprawl is emerging as a major environmental challenge by destroying natural habitats, consuming productive agricultural land, and contributing to climate change by increasing energy demands. To address this knowledge gap, we propose an estimation of urban land take that combines cadastral parcels and building footprints. Land parcels can be considered as a suitable minimum mapping unit as they are directly related to the spatial level where economic decisions on land use conversion are made. The proposed geospatial method is compared to methods that depend on datasets of High Resolution Layer Imperviousness, Global Building Footprints (alone), Corine Land Cover, Urban Atlas, and Global Human Settlement Layer. The method is exemplified in case studies in Greece, specifically: (a) two islands of the South Aegean Region (Mykonos and Thera), that are heavily impacted by tourism development and sprawl and (b) a peri-urban zone (Thermaikos-Michaniona) within the metropolitan area of Thessaloniki, impacted by intense suburbanization. Results show that urban land consumes important shares of available land since the mid-20th century, this fact highlighting the dynamic encroachment of urban development. Calculation shows that other methods could underestimate urbanized areas by up to 80%–90%. In the discussion section, the advantages of shifting the focus from the pixel to the parcel are further justified, while explicit links to spatial planning policies for sprawl containment are drawn. Such policies could be informed by more realistic estimations of urban land take, in order to proceed with strategic and regulatory measures to support the ‘no net land take’ policy of Europe.
通过结合地籍地块和建筑足迹,对城市用地进行更切合实际的估算
尽管这是一个重要的研究课题,但目前还没有一种广为接受的方法来估算城市化造成的土地占用。目前,在欧洲和全球范围内都有精确的地理空间数据集;然而,不同的城市土地占用量化方法可能导致不同的结果,从而可能导致低估。这种情况令人担忧,因为城市无计划扩张正在成为一项重大的环境挑战,它破坏了自然栖息地,消耗了农业生产用地,并通过增加能源需求加剧了气候变化。为了弥补这一知识空白,我们提出了一种结合地籍地块和建筑物足迹的城市用地估算方法。地块可被视为合适的最小制图单元,因为它们与做出土地用途转换经济决策的空间层面直接相关。建议的地理空间方法与依赖于高分辨率不透水层、全球建筑足迹(单独)、Corine 土地覆盖、城市图集和全球人类居住层数据集的方法进行了比较。该方法在希腊的案例研究中进行了示范,特别是:(a) 南爱琴海地区的两个岛屿(米克诺斯岛和泰拉岛),这两个岛屿受到旅游业发展和无序扩张的严重影响;(b) 塞萨洛尼基大都市区内的一个近郊区(Thermaikos-Michaniona),受到严重郊区化的影响。结果表明,自 20 世纪中期以来,城市用地消耗了大量可用土地,这一事实凸显了城市发展的动态侵蚀。计算结果表明,其他方法可能会低估城市化面积达 80%-90%。在讨论部分,进一步论证了将关注点从像素转移到地块的优势,同时明确了与遏制无计划扩展的空间规划政策的联系。通过对城市用地进行更切合实际的估算,可以为这些政策提供依据,从而采取战略和监管措施,支持欧洲的 "无净土地占用 "政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.40%
发文量
159
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信