Evaluation of a nature-based virtual reality intervention to support hospice caregivers: a pilot feasibility study

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Rebecca H Lehto, Arienne Patano, Mohammed Alanazi, Gary Bente, Andrew Mason, Grace Caldwell, Dawn Goldstein, Gwen Wyatt
{"title":"Evaluation of a nature-based virtual reality intervention to support hospice caregivers: a pilot feasibility study","authors":"Rebecca H Lehto, Arienne Patano, Mohammed Alanazi, Gary Bente, Andrew Mason, Grace Caldwell, Dawn Goldstein, Gwen Wyatt","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2024-005087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Hospice family caregivers (CGs) may experience poor emotional health and diminished quality of life (QOL) secondary to stressors that accompany home-based end-of-life caregiving. Innovative flexible strategies are needed to support hospice CGs in their homes. Being outdoors in nature enhances well-being but is often not accessible to home-based CGs. The purpose was to evaluate the feasibility/acceptability, and preliminary emotional health and QOL outcomes of a 5-day nature-based virtual reality (VR) intervention. Methods A pre–post design was used. Hospice CGs engaged in self-selected 10 min nature experiences via VR headset over 5 days. Preintervention surveys included demographics and the PROMIS-29 QOL measure (physical/social function, anxiety/depressive symptoms, fatigue, sleep and pain). Postintervention surveys included acceptability/feasibility surveys, PROMIS-29 and a VR-related symptom checklist. Data analysis included descriptives and paired t-tests. Results 15 CGs (mean 61.13±12.47 years; 12 females) completed the study. Findings demonstrated high acceptability (14.46±1.77; range 0–16); feasibility (13.93±2.43;range 0–16). Adverse VR symptoms were minimal. PROMIS-29 overall scores were significantly improved following the 5-day intervention (pre: 66.33±8.47; post: 61.07±7.83,p=0.01). Paired t-tests showed significant pre–post changes in anxiety (t=2.206, p<0.05) and favourable trends on other QOL dimensions. Conclusions Feasibility/acceptability and QOL data support further testing of VR nature immersive experiences in the home environment with larger more diverse representative samples.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2024-005087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives Hospice family caregivers (CGs) may experience poor emotional health and diminished quality of life (QOL) secondary to stressors that accompany home-based end-of-life caregiving. Innovative flexible strategies are needed to support hospice CGs in their homes. Being outdoors in nature enhances well-being but is often not accessible to home-based CGs. The purpose was to evaluate the feasibility/acceptability, and preliminary emotional health and QOL outcomes of a 5-day nature-based virtual reality (VR) intervention. Methods A pre–post design was used. Hospice CGs engaged in self-selected 10 min nature experiences via VR headset over 5 days. Preintervention surveys included demographics and the PROMIS-29 QOL measure (physical/social function, anxiety/depressive symptoms, fatigue, sleep and pain). Postintervention surveys included acceptability/feasibility surveys, PROMIS-29 and a VR-related symptom checklist. Data analysis included descriptives and paired t-tests. Results 15 CGs (mean 61.13±12.47 years; 12 females) completed the study. Findings demonstrated high acceptability (14.46±1.77; range 0–16); feasibility (13.93±2.43;range 0–16). Adverse VR symptoms were minimal. PROMIS-29 overall scores were significantly improved following the 5-day intervention (pre: 66.33±8.47; post: 61.07±7.83,p=0.01). Paired t-tests showed significant pre–post changes in anxiety (t=2.206, p<0.05) and favourable trends on other QOL dimensions. Conclusions Feasibility/acceptability and QOL data support further testing of VR nature immersive experiences in the home environment with larger more diverse representative samples.
评估基于自然的虚拟现实干预,以支持临终关怀护理人员:试点可行性研究
目标 临终关怀家庭照护者(CGs)可能会因家庭临终关怀所带来的压力而导致情绪不佳和生活质量(QOL)下降。我们需要创新灵活的策略来支持居家安宁疗护的临终关怀者。在大自然中进行户外活动可以提高身心健康,但居家临终关怀人员往往无法做到这一点。目的是评估为期 5 天的基于自然的虚拟现实(VR)干预的可行性/可接受性以及初步的情绪健康和 QOL 结果。方法 采用前后期设计。安宁疗护 CG 在 5 天内通过 VR 头显进行自我选择的 10 分钟自然体验。干预前调查包括人口统计学和 PROMIS-29 QOL 测量(身体/社会功能、焦虑/抑郁症状、疲劳、睡眠和疼痛)。干预后调查包括可接受性/可行性调查、PROMIS-29 和 VR 相关症状检查表。数据分析包括描述性分析和配对 t 检验。结果 15 名 CG(平均 61.13±12.47 岁;12 名女性)完成了研究。研究结果表明可接受性高(14.46±1.77;范围 0-16);可行性高(13.93±2.43;范围 0-16)。VR 不良症状极少。为期 5 天的干预后,PROMIS-29 总分有了明显提高(干预前:66.33±8.47;干预后:61.07±7.83,p=0.01)。配对 t 检验显示,焦虑在干预前和干预后都有明显变化(t=2.206,p<0.05),其他 QOL 维度也呈现良好趋势。结论 可行性/可接受性和 QOL 数据支持在更大范围、更具多样性的代表性样本中进一步测试家庭环境中的 VR 沉浸式自然体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信