Is there a genetic relationship between chondrules and matrix?

Elishevah van Kooten, Adrian Brearley, Denton Ebel, Conel Alexander, Marina Gemma, Dominik Hezel
{"title":"Is there a genetic relationship between chondrules and matrix?","authors":"Elishevah van Kooten, Adrian Brearley, Denton Ebel, Conel Alexander, Marina Gemma, Dominik Hezel","doi":"arxiv-2409.08662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chondritic components such as chondrules and matrix are the key time capsules\nthat can help us understand the evolution and dynamics of the protoplanetary\ndisk from which the Solar System originated. Knowledge of where and how these\ncomponents formed and to what extent they were transported in the gaseous disk\nprovides major constraints to astrophysical models that investigate planet\nformation. Here, we explore whether chondrules and matrix are genetically\nrelated to each other and formed from single reservoirs per chondrite group or\nif every chondrite represents a unique proportion of components transported\nfrom a small number of formation reservoirs in the disk. These static versus\ndynamic disk interpretations of cosmochemical data have profound implications\nfor the accretion history of the planets in the Solar System. To fully\nunderstand the relationship between chondrules and matrix and their potential\ncomplementarity, we dive into the petrological nature and origin of matrix, the\nchemical and isotopic compositions of chondrules and matrix and evaluate these\ndata considering the effect of secondary alteration observed in chondrites and\nthe potential complexity of chondrule formation. Even though we, the authors,\nhave used different datasets and arrived at differing interpretations of\nchondrule-matrix relationships in the past, this review provides clarity on the\nexisting data and has given us new directions towards future research that can\nresolve the complementarity debate.","PeriodicalId":501270,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Geophysics","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chondritic components such as chondrules and matrix are the key time capsules that can help us understand the evolution and dynamics of the protoplanetary disk from which the Solar System originated. Knowledge of where and how these components formed and to what extent they were transported in the gaseous disk provides major constraints to astrophysical models that investigate planet formation. Here, we explore whether chondrules and matrix are genetically related to each other and formed from single reservoirs per chondrite group or if every chondrite represents a unique proportion of components transported from a small number of formation reservoirs in the disk. These static versus dynamic disk interpretations of cosmochemical data have profound implications for the accretion history of the planets in the Solar System. To fully understand the relationship between chondrules and matrix and their potential complementarity, we dive into the petrological nature and origin of matrix, the chemical and isotopic compositions of chondrules and matrix and evaluate these data considering the effect of secondary alteration observed in chondrites and the potential complexity of chondrule formation. Even though we, the authors, have used different datasets and arrived at differing interpretations of chondrule-matrix relationships in the past, this review provides clarity on the existing data and has given us new directions towards future research that can resolve the complementarity debate.
软骨和基质之间有遗传关系吗?
软玉和基质等软玉成分是关键的时间胶囊,可以帮助我们了解太阳系起源的原行星盘的演化和动力学。了解这些成分形成的地点和方式,以及它们在气态盘中的迁移程度,为研究行星形成的天体物理模型提供了重要的约束条件。在这里,我们探讨了软玉和基质是否在基因上相互关联,并且是由每个软玉组中的单一储层形成的,或者是否每块软玉都代表了从气态盘中少数形成储层中运移而来的成分的独特比例。对宇宙化学数据的这些静态与动态磁盘解释对太阳系行星的吸积历史有着深远的影响。为了充分理解软玉和基质之间的关系及其潜在的互补性,我们深入研究了基质的岩石学性质和起源、软玉和基质的化学成分和同位素成分,并考虑了在软玉中观察到的二次蚀变的影响以及软玉形成的潜在复杂性,对这些数据进行了评估。尽管我们--作者--在过去使用了不同的数据集,并对软玉与基质的关系做出了不同的解释,但本综述澄清了现有的数据,并为我们提供了未来研究的新方向,从而解决了互补性的争论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信