Prediction and optimization framework of shear strength of reinforced concrete flanged shear wall based on machine learning and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II

IF 2.1 4区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Hanwen Zhang, Jinlong Liu, Shiqi Wang, Keyu Chen, Lei Xu, Jiaxing Ma, Qinghe Wang
{"title":"Prediction and optimization framework of shear strength of reinforced concrete flanged shear wall based on machine learning and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II","authors":"Hanwen Zhang, Jinlong Liu, Shiqi Wang, Keyu Chen, Lei Xu, Jiaxing Ma, Qinghe Wang","doi":"10.1177/13694332241281534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reinforced concrete (RC) flanged shear wall has good lateral strength and stiffness, which has been widely used in building structures. Due to the coupling effect of many factors such as wall section shape, shear span ratio, so the shear performance evaluation of flanged wall is still very limited. This paper proposed a prediction framework for the shear capacity of RC flanged shear walls. A database containing 14 input variables, 1 output variable and 153 samples was constructed to evaluate the prediction accuracy of 11 existing design methods. The Pearson coefficient was used to preliminarily analyze the correlation between variables. The grid search was used to optimize the hyperparameters of 4 machine learning models, and six statistical indicators ( R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>, R, RMSE, SD, MAE, and MAPE) were used to comprehensively compare the prediction results of the ML models to determine the best model. On this basis, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to enhance the interpretability of the prediction models, and the mechanism of the input variables on the shear capacity was quantified. A graphical user interface (GUI) was proposed to guide the engineering design. A multi-objective model (MOO) was established to analyze the trade-off between shear performance and cost, thereby determining the best optimal scheme. The results show that the prediction accuracy of the ML models is better than the existing design methods. The XGB model has the best prediction performance, with R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>, R, RMSE are 0.99, 0.99, 118.96, respectively. The SHAP method can effectively enhance the interpretability of the ML models, and t<jats:sub>w</jats:sub>, l<jats:sub>w</jats:sub> and f <jats:sup>′</jats:sup><jats:sub>c</jats:sub> are the key parameters affecting the shear capacity of the flanged shear wall.","PeriodicalId":50849,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Structural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13694332241281534","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reinforced concrete (RC) flanged shear wall has good lateral strength and stiffness, which has been widely used in building structures. Due to the coupling effect of many factors such as wall section shape, shear span ratio, so the shear performance evaluation of flanged wall is still very limited. This paper proposed a prediction framework for the shear capacity of RC flanged shear walls. A database containing 14 input variables, 1 output variable and 153 samples was constructed to evaluate the prediction accuracy of 11 existing design methods. The Pearson coefficient was used to preliminarily analyze the correlation between variables. The grid search was used to optimize the hyperparameters of 4 machine learning models, and six statistical indicators ( R2, R, RMSE, SD, MAE, and MAPE) were used to comprehensively compare the prediction results of the ML models to determine the best model. On this basis, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to enhance the interpretability of the prediction models, and the mechanism of the input variables on the shear capacity was quantified. A graphical user interface (GUI) was proposed to guide the engineering design. A multi-objective model (MOO) was established to analyze the trade-off between shear performance and cost, thereby determining the best optimal scheme. The results show that the prediction accuracy of the ML models is better than the existing design methods. The XGB model has the best prediction performance, with R2, R, RMSE are 0.99, 0.99, 118.96, respectively. The SHAP method can effectively enhance the interpretability of the ML models, and tw, lw and f c are the key parameters affecting the shear capacity of the flanged shear wall.
基于机器学习和非支配排序遗传算法的钢筋混凝土翻边剪力墙抗剪强度预测和优化框架-II
钢筋混凝土(RC)翻边剪力墙具有良好的侧向强度和刚度,已被广泛应用于建筑结构中。由于墙体截面形状、剪跨比等诸多因素的耦合作用,对翻边剪力墙的抗剪性能评估还很有限。本文提出了一种钢筋混凝土翻边剪力墙抗剪能力预测框架。本文建立了一个包含 14 个输入变量、1 个输出变量和 153 个样本的数据库,以评估现有 11 种设计方法的预测精度。使用皮尔逊系数初步分析了变量之间的相关性。利用网格搜索对 4 个机器学习模型的超参数进行优化,并利用 R2、R、RMSE、SD、MAE 和 MAPE 六项统计指标对 ML 模型的预测结果进行综合比较,以确定最佳模型。在此基础上,利用 SHapley Additive exPlanations(SHAP)增强了预测模型的可解释性,并量化了输入变量对剪切能力的影响机制。提出了图形用户界面(GUI)来指导工程设计。建立了一个多目标模型(MOO)来分析剪切性能和成本之间的权衡,从而确定最佳方案。结果表明,ML 模型的预测精度优于现有的设计方法。XGB 模型的预测性能最好,R2、R、RMSE 分别为 0.99、0.99、118.96。SHAP方法能有效提高ML模型的可解释性,而tw、lw和f ′c是影响翻边剪力墙抗剪能力的关键参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Structural Engineering
Advances in Structural Engineering 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
230
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Advances in Structural Engineering was established in 1997 and has become one of the major peer-reviewed journals in the field of structural engineering. To better fulfil the mission of the journal, we have recently decided to launch two new features for the journal: (a) invited review papers providing an in-depth exposition of a topic of significant current interest; (b) short papers reporting truly new technologies in structural engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信