Improving governance outcomes through AI documentation: Bridging theory and practice

Amy A. Winecoff, Miranda Bogen
{"title":"Improving governance outcomes through AI documentation: Bridging theory and practice","authors":"Amy A. Winecoff, Miranda Bogen","doi":"arxiv-2409.08960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Documentation plays a crucial role in both external accountability and\ninternal governance of AI systems. Although there are many proposals for\ndocumenting AI data, models, systems, and methods, the ways these practices\nenhance governance as well as the challenges practitioners and organizations\nface with documentation remain underexplored. In this paper, we analyze 37\nproposed documentation frameworks and 21 empirical studies evaluating their\nuse. We identify potential hypotheses about how documentation can strengthen\ngovernance, such as informing stakeholders about AI risks and usage, fostering\ncollaboration, encouraging ethical reflection, and reinforcing best practices.\nHowever, empirical evidence shows that practitioners often encounter obstacles\nthat prevent documentation from achieving these goals. We also highlight key\nconsiderations for organizations when designing documentation, such as\ndetermining the appropriate level of detail and balancing automation in the\nprocess. Finally, we offer recommendations for further research and for\nimplementing effective documentation practices in real-world contexts.","PeriodicalId":501541,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Documentation plays a crucial role in both external accountability and internal governance of AI systems. Although there are many proposals for documenting AI data, models, systems, and methods, the ways these practices enhance governance as well as the challenges practitioners and organizations face with documentation remain underexplored. In this paper, we analyze 37 proposed documentation frameworks and 21 empirical studies evaluating their use. We identify potential hypotheses about how documentation can strengthen governance, such as informing stakeholders about AI risks and usage, fostering collaboration, encouraging ethical reflection, and reinforcing best practices. However, empirical evidence shows that practitioners often encounter obstacles that prevent documentation from achieving these goals. We also highlight key considerations for organizations when designing documentation, such as determining the appropriate level of detail and balancing automation in the process. Finally, we offer recommendations for further research and for implementing effective documentation practices in real-world contexts.
通过人工智能文件改善治理成果:连接理论与实践
文档在人工智能系统的外部问责和内部治理方面都发挥着至关重要的作用。虽然有很多关于记录人工智能数据、模型、系统和方法的建议,但这些做法如何加强治理以及从业者和组织在记录方面面临的挑战仍未得到充分探索。在本文中,我们分析了 37 个拟议的文档框架和 21 项评估其使用情况的实证研究。我们提出了关于文档如何加强管理的潜在假设,例如告知利益相关者人工智能的风险和使用情况、促进合作、鼓励道德反思以及强化最佳实践。我们还强调了组织在设计文档时的关键考虑因素,如确定适当的详细程度和平衡流程中的自动化。最后,我们为进一步研究和在现实环境中实施有效的文档实践提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信