Can the parameters of penile duplex assessment predict the success of urethroplasty?

IF 0.5 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Waleed Ghoneima, Ahmed M. Rammah, Mohamed Aboulfotouh El gharably, Samih Zamel, Moamen Mohamed, Hesham Torad
{"title":"Can the parameters of penile duplex assessment predict the success of urethroplasty?","authors":"Waleed Ghoneima, Ahmed M. Rammah, Mohamed Aboulfotouh El gharably, Samih Zamel, Moamen Mohamed, Hesham Torad","doi":"10.1186/s12301-024-00456-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work aimed to study the role of penile duplex in predicting the outcome of anastomotic urethroplasty. Between March 2022 and February 2023, all patients presented with posterior urethral distraction defect (PUDD) underwent anastomotic end to end urethroplasty. Preoperative evaluation of sexual function was performed using international index of erectile function (IIEF-5) and penile doppler parameters (the response E1 to E5, peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV) and resistivity index (RI)). Each patient was, routinely, evaluated through 12 month-follow up using IIEF-5, penile doppler parameters, uroflowmetry for Qmax and pelvic ultrasound for postvoid residual urine (PVR). The procedure was considered successful if Qmax > 15 ml/s and PVR < 50 cc at the end of follow up. The correlation between the success rate of anastomotic urethroplasty and pre-operative penile Doppler parameters was the primary outcome. Thirty patients with a mean age of 29.47 ± 9.79 years were evaluated. Twenty patients (66.7%) had previous orthopedic surgery. The stricture site was membranous in 6 patients (20.0%) and bubo-membranous in 24 (80.0%). The mean stricture length was 2.52 ± 0.98 cm. There was a statistically significant increase in mean end-diastolic velocity (P < 0.001) with a subsequent significant decrease in mean resistance index (P < 0.001). 14.3% of pre-operatively potent patients developed venous leakage (P < 0.001), while there was no change of arteriogenic or venogenic erectile dysfunction. In addition, of the patients who have arteriogenic erectile dysfunction, 37.5% did not require surgery, 25% had a urethrocystoscopy, and 37.5% required a repeat end to end urethroplasty. There is a significant association between pre-operative peak systolic velocity and the need for re-operation (P = 0.005). Penile duplex may anticipate anastomotic urethroplasty efficacy in the case of PUDD.","PeriodicalId":7432,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Urology","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-024-00456-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work aimed to study the role of penile duplex in predicting the outcome of anastomotic urethroplasty. Between March 2022 and February 2023, all patients presented with posterior urethral distraction defect (PUDD) underwent anastomotic end to end urethroplasty. Preoperative evaluation of sexual function was performed using international index of erectile function (IIEF-5) and penile doppler parameters (the response E1 to E5, peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV) and resistivity index (RI)). Each patient was, routinely, evaluated through 12 month-follow up using IIEF-5, penile doppler parameters, uroflowmetry for Qmax and pelvic ultrasound for postvoid residual urine (PVR). The procedure was considered successful if Qmax > 15 ml/s and PVR < 50 cc at the end of follow up. The correlation between the success rate of anastomotic urethroplasty and pre-operative penile Doppler parameters was the primary outcome. Thirty patients with a mean age of 29.47 ± 9.79 years were evaluated. Twenty patients (66.7%) had previous orthopedic surgery. The stricture site was membranous in 6 patients (20.0%) and bubo-membranous in 24 (80.0%). The mean stricture length was 2.52 ± 0.98 cm. There was a statistically significant increase in mean end-diastolic velocity (P < 0.001) with a subsequent significant decrease in mean resistance index (P < 0.001). 14.3% of pre-operatively potent patients developed venous leakage (P < 0.001), while there was no change of arteriogenic or venogenic erectile dysfunction. In addition, of the patients who have arteriogenic erectile dysfunction, 37.5% did not require surgery, 25% had a urethrocystoscopy, and 37.5% required a repeat end to end urethroplasty. There is a significant association between pre-operative peak systolic velocity and the need for re-operation (P = 0.005). Penile duplex may anticipate anastomotic urethroplasty efficacy in the case of PUDD.
阴茎二重反射评估参数能否预测尿道成形术的成功?
这项工作旨在研究阴茎二重反射在预测吻合口尿道成形术结果方面的作用。2022年3月至2023年2月期间,所有患有后尿道牵拉缺损(PUDD)的患者均接受了吻合口端对端尿道成形术。术前使用国际勃起功能指数(IIEF-5)和阴茎多普勒参数(E1至E5反应、收缩峰值速度(PSV)、舒张末期速度(EDV)和电阻率指数(RI))对性功能进行评估。对每位患者进行为期 12 个月的常规随访评估,评估方法包括 IIEF-5、阴茎多普勒参数、尿流率 Qmax 和盆腔超声检查排尿后残余尿(PVR)。随访结束时,如果 Qmax > 15 ml/s,PVR < 50 cc,则认为手术成功。吻合尿道成形术的成功率与术前阴茎多普勒参数之间的相关性是主要结果。接受评估的 30 名患者的平均年龄为(29.47±9.79)岁。20名患者(66.7%)曾接受过骨科手术。6名患者(20.0%)的狭窄部位为膜性,24名患者(80.0%)的狭窄部位为气泡膜性。平均狭窄长度为 2.52 ± 0.98 厘米。据统计,平均舒张末期速度明显增加(P < 0.001),平均阻力指数随之明显下降(P < 0.001)。14.3%的术前潜能患者出现了静脉漏(P < 0.001),而动脉源性或静脉源性勃起功能障碍没有变化。此外,在出现动脉源性勃起功能障碍的患者中,37.5%不需要手术,25%需要进行尿道膀胱镜检查,37.5%需要再次进行端对端尿道成形术。术前收缩峰值速度与再次手术的需求之间存在明显的关联(P = 0.005)。阴茎双折线可预测PUDD病例中吻合口尿道成形术的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Urology
African Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信