Science and Literature in Cormac McCarthy's Expanding Worlds by Bryan Giemza (review)

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
William Brannon
{"title":"Science and Literature in Cormac McCarthy's Expanding Worlds by Bryan Giemza (review)","authors":"William Brannon","doi":"10.1353/wal.2024.a937417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Science and Literature in Cormac McCarthy's Expanding Worlds</em> by Bryan Giemza <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> William Brannon </li> </ul> Bryan Giemza, <em>Science and Literature in Cormac McCarthy's Expanding Worlds</em>. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2023. 175 pp. Hardcover, $100; e-book, $90. <p>Bryan Giemza's <em>Science and Literature in Cormac McCarthy's Expanding Worlds</em> examines how McCarthy's canon reflects his engagement with the sciences. Giemza suggests that a better understanding of McCarthy's involvement with disciplines outside the humanities offers insight into recurring ideas in McCarthy's texts and a glimpse into his process of composing. Giemza seeks to provide examples of how McCarthy's work may be placed \"within contemporary scientific discourse and literary criticism\" and asserts that his intention in this critical endeavor despite resting in \"contextual and translational work between humanities and conventionally understood STEM disciplines, has no theory of everything to offer readers, just case-specific insights from seeing McCarthy's work translationally\" (8–9). As Giemza notes, his book joins other recent McCarthy criticism seeking to examine the links between McCarthy's oeuvre and disciplines outside the humanities, and he mentions as an example Lydia Cooper's <em>Cormac McCarthy: A Complexity Theory of Literature</em> (2021).</p> <p>Giemza devotes the first chapter to an overview of the history of the Santa Fe Institute (SFI) and draws upon conversations with Mc-Carthy's brother, Dennis, a Santa Fe resident, as well as scholars at SFI to present a portrayal of Cormac McCarthy's intellectual engagement at the institute that is opposite in many ways to the popular perception of McCarthy as an isolated author frequently shunning publicity in favor of solitude. Giemza suggests that among the other residents at SFI, the majority of whom are notable for work in the sciences, McCarthy often occupied the role of facilitator, helping bridge academic discussions between those working at the institute. For Giemza, McCarthy's overt engagement with the sciences at SFI manifests in his last two published novels, <em>The Passenger</em> (2022) and <em>Stella Maris</em> (2022), and represents \"not so much a new departure as reaching a long-sought waypoint, not for disembarkation, but for a life spent in continual wonder of expanding universes\" (28).</p> <p>Subsequent chapters in Giemza's book focus on extended examples from McCarthy's canon, particularly <em>Suttree</em>, to establish the <strong>[End Page 194]</strong> connections between McCarthy's work and contemporary scientific discourse. Chapter two considers chirality and handedness in McCarthy's fictional universe, using as a case study the presence of twins and doubling in <em>Suttree. Suttree</em> remains the primary focus in the third and fourth chapters, too, with Giemza suggesting in chapter three that Harrogate's ill-advised plans to access the bank vault via detonating dynamite function as representative examples of the implications of technology misuse. In chapter four Giemza argues that the autobiographical elements of McCarthy present in <em>Suttree</em> parallel the historical development of the Tennessee Valley Authority as a human attempt via engineering to control and regulate the natural world. Giemza begins chapter five with a discussion of McCarthy's correspondence with Guy Davenport and Davenport's influence on McCarthy. Giemza switches his focus later in the chapter to an overview of the 2022 duology and concludes the chapter with a thought experiment that seeks to illustrate what Giemza identifies as recurring epistemological questions in McCarthy's works.</p> <p>The strengths of Bryan Giemza's book include offering a compelling starting point for further criticism into McCarthy's writing process and resultant texts. Due to the nature of its endeavor in exploring how McCarthy was influenced by the sciences, Giemza's volume may pose initial challenges for readers not familiar with contemporary scientific discourse. In addition, readers interested primarily in McCarthy's southwestern phase may be disappointed in Giemza's reliance on examples from <em>Suttree</em> in many chapters. However, <em>Science and Literature in Cormac McCarthy's Expanding Worlds</em> offers an engaging perspective on McCarthy's work and provides a critical framework applicable to the entire span of McCarthy's canon.</p> William Brannon Collin College Copyright © 2024 Western Literature Association ... </p>","PeriodicalId":23875,"journal":{"name":"Western American Literature","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western American Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wal.2024.a937417","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Science and Literature in Cormac McCarthy's Expanding Worlds by Bryan Giemza
  • William Brannon
Bryan Giemza, Science and Literature in Cormac McCarthy's Expanding Worlds. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2023. 175 pp. Hardcover, $100; e-book, $90.

Bryan Giemza's Science and Literature in Cormac McCarthy's Expanding Worlds examines how McCarthy's canon reflects his engagement with the sciences. Giemza suggests that a better understanding of McCarthy's involvement with disciplines outside the humanities offers insight into recurring ideas in McCarthy's texts and a glimpse into his process of composing. Giemza seeks to provide examples of how McCarthy's work may be placed "within contemporary scientific discourse and literary criticism" and asserts that his intention in this critical endeavor despite resting in "contextual and translational work between humanities and conventionally understood STEM disciplines, has no theory of everything to offer readers, just case-specific insights from seeing McCarthy's work translationally" (8–9). As Giemza notes, his book joins other recent McCarthy criticism seeking to examine the links between McCarthy's oeuvre and disciplines outside the humanities, and he mentions as an example Lydia Cooper's Cormac McCarthy: A Complexity Theory of Literature (2021).

Giemza devotes the first chapter to an overview of the history of the Santa Fe Institute (SFI) and draws upon conversations with Mc-Carthy's brother, Dennis, a Santa Fe resident, as well as scholars at SFI to present a portrayal of Cormac McCarthy's intellectual engagement at the institute that is opposite in many ways to the popular perception of McCarthy as an isolated author frequently shunning publicity in favor of solitude. Giemza suggests that among the other residents at SFI, the majority of whom are notable for work in the sciences, McCarthy often occupied the role of facilitator, helping bridge academic discussions between those working at the institute. For Giemza, McCarthy's overt engagement with the sciences at SFI manifests in his last two published novels, The Passenger (2022) and Stella Maris (2022), and represents "not so much a new departure as reaching a long-sought waypoint, not for disembarkation, but for a life spent in continual wonder of expanding universes" (28).

Subsequent chapters in Giemza's book focus on extended examples from McCarthy's canon, particularly Suttree, to establish the [End Page 194] connections between McCarthy's work and contemporary scientific discourse. Chapter two considers chirality and handedness in McCarthy's fictional universe, using as a case study the presence of twins and doubling in Suttree. Suttree remains the primary focus in the third and fourth chapters, too, with Giemza suggesting in chapter three that Harrogate's ill-advised plans to access the bank vault via detonating dynamite function as representative examples of the implications of technology misuse. In chapter four Giemza argues that the autobiographical elements of McCarthy present in Suttree parallel the historical development of the Tennessee Valley Authority as a human attempt via engineering to control and regulate the natural world. Giemza begins chapter five with a discussion of McCarthy's correspondence with Guy Davenport and Davenport's influence on McCarthy. Giemza switches his focus later in the chapter to an overview of the 2022 duology and concludes the chapter with a thought experiment that seeks to illustrate what Giemza identifies as recurring epistemological questions in McCarthy's works.

The strengths of Bryan Giemza's book include offering a compelling starting point for further criticism into McCarthy's writing process and resultant texts. Due to the nature of its endeavor in exploring how McCarthy was influenced by the sciences, Giemza's volume may pose initial challenges for readers not familiar with contemporary scientific discourse. In addition, readers interested primarily in McCarthy's southwestern phase may be disappointed in Giemza's reliance on examples from Suttree in many chapters. However, Science and Literature in Cormac McCarthy's Expanding Worlds offers an engaging perspective on McCarthy's work and provides a critical framework applicable to the entire span of McCarthy's canon.

William Brannon Collin College Copyright © 2024 Western Literature Association ...

科马克-麦卡锡《拓展世界》中的科学与文学》,布莱恩-吉姆扎著(评论)
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 布莱恩-吉姆扎著:《科马克-麦卡锡拓展世界中的科学与文学》 威廉-布兰农 布莱恩-吉姆扎著:《科马克-麦卡锡拓展世界中的科学与文学》。纽约:布鲁姆斯伯里学术出版社,2023 年。175 pp.精装,100 美元;电子书,90 美元。布莱恩-吉姆扎(Bryan Giemza)的《科马克-麦卡锡拓展世界中的科学与文学》探讨了麦卡锡的作品如何反映了他与科学的关系。Giemza 认为,更好地了解麦卡锡与人文学科之外的学科的关系,有助于深入了解麦卡锡文本中反复出现的观点,并一窥他的创作过程。Giemza 试图举例说明如何将麦卡锡的作品 "置于当代科学话语和文学批评之中",并断言他的这一批评努力的意图尽管在于 "在人文学科和传统理解的 STEM 学科之间进行语境和翻译工作,但并没有向读者提供任何理论,只是通过翻译来看待麦卡锡的作品,从而获得具体的见解"(8-9)。正如 Giemza 所说,他的书与近期其他麦卡锡评论一样,试图研究麦卡锡的作品与人文学科之外的学科之间的联系,他提到的一个例子是莉迪亚-库珀(Lydia Cooper)的《科马克-麦卡锡》(Cormac McCarthy):文学的复杂性理论》(2021 年)。Giemza 在第一章概述了圣达菲学院(Santa Fe Institute,SFI)的历史,并通过与麦卡锡的兄弟、圣达菲居民丹尼斯以及圣达菲学院的学者的交谈,介绍了科马克-麦卡锡在学院的知识参与情况,这与人们对麦卡锡的普遍看法截然不同,人们认为麦卡锡是一位与世隔绝的作家,经常避开公众而独来独往。Giemza认为,在SFI的其他居民中,大多数人都以科学领域的工作而闻名,麦卡锡经常扮演促进者的角色,帮助在研究所工作的人之间进行学术讨论。在吉姆扎看来,麦卡锡在 SFI 与科学的公开接触体现在他最后出版的两部小说《乘客》(2022 年)和《斯特拉-马里斯》(2022 年)中,这两部小说 "与其说是一次新的启程,不如说是到达了一个寻觅已久的航点,不是为了登岸,而是为了在对不断扩大的宇宙的不断惊叹中度过一生"(28)。吉姆扎在书中随后的章节重点讨论了麦卡锡作品中的扩展例子,尤其是《苏特里》,以建立麦卡锡作品与当代科学话语之间的 [完 194 页] 联系。第二章探讨了麦卡锡虚构宇宙中的奇异性和手性,以《苏特里》中出现的双胞胎和双生子为案例进行研究。吉姆扎在第三章中指出,哈罗盖特通过引爆炸药进入银行金库的不明智计划是滥用技术影响的代表性例子。在第四章中,吉姆扎认为《苏特里》中麦卡锡的自传元素与田纳西流域管理局的历史发展相平行,后者是人类通过工程技术控制和调节自然世界的尝试。Giemza 在第五章开头讨论了麦卡锡与 Guy Davenport 的通信以及 Davenport 对麦卡锡的影响。Giemza 在本章后半部分将重点转向了对《2022》二部曲的概述,并以一个思想实验作为本章的结尾,试图说明 Giemza 认为麦卡锡作品中反复出现的认识论问题。布莱恩-吉姆扎这本书的优点包括为进一步批评麦卡锡的写作过程和成果文本提供了一个令人信服的起点。由于本书致力于探讨麦卡锡如何受到科学的影响,因此对于不熟悉当代科学话语的读者来说,Giemza 的这本书可能会带来一些初步的挑战。此外,主要对麦卡锡的西南阶段感兴趣的读者可能会对 Giemza 在许多章节中依赖 Suttree 的例子感到失望。不过,《科马克-麦卡锡拓展世界中的科学与文学》为麦卡锡的作品提供了一个引人入胜的视角,并提供了一个适用于麦卡锡整个作品的批评框架。William Brannon Collin College 版权所有 © 2024 西部文学协会 ...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western American Literature
Western American Literature LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信