Privacy-Preserving Distributed Maximum Consensus Without Accuracy Loss

Wenrui Yu, Richard Heusdens, Jun Pang, Qiongxiu Li
{"title":"Privacy-Preserving Distributed Maximum Consensus Without Accuracy Loss","authors":"Wenrui Yu, Richard Heusdens, Jun Pang, Qiongxiu Li","doi":"arxiv-2409.10226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In distributed networks, calculating the maximum element is a fundamental\ntask in data analysis, known as the distributed maximum consensus problem.\nHowever, the sensitive nature of the data involved makes privacy protection\nessential. Despite its importance, privacy in distributed maximum consensus has\nreceived limited attention in the literature. Traditional privacy-preserving\nmethods typically add noise to updates, degrading the accuracy of the final\nresult. To overcome these limitations, we propose a novel distributed\noptimization-based approach that preserves privacy without sacrificing\naccuracy. Our method introduces virtual nodes to form an augmented graph and\nleverages a carefully designed initialization process to ensure the privacy of\nhonest participants, even when all their neighboring nodes are dishonest.\nThrough a comprehensive information-theoretical analysis, we derive a\nsufficient condition to protect private data against both passive and\neavesdropping adversaries. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of\nour approach, demonstrating that it not only preserves perfect privacy but also\nmaintains accuracy, outperforming existing noise-based methods that typically\nsuffer from accuracy loss.","PeriodicalId":501034,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - EE - Signal Processing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - EE - Signal Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.10226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In distributed networks, calculating the maximum element is a fundamental task in data analysis, known as the distributed maximum consensus problem. However, the sensitive nature of the data involved makes privacy protection essential. Despite its importance, privacy in distributed maximum consensus has received limited attention in the literature. Traditional privacy-preserving methods typically add noise to updates, degrading the accuracy of the final result. To overcome these limitations, we propose a novel distributed optimization-based approach that preserves privacy without sacrificing accuracy. Our method introduces virtual nodes to form an augmented graph and leverages a carefully designed initialization process to ensure the privacy of honest participants, even when all their neighboring nodes are dishonest. Through a comprehensive information-theoretical analysis, we derive a sufficient condition to protect private data against both passive and eavesdropping adversaries. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of our approach, demonstrating that it not only preserves perfect privacy but also maintains accuracy, outperforming existing noise-based methods that typically suffer from accuracy loss.
无精度损失的隐私保护分布式最大共识
在分布式网络中,计算最大元素是数据分析的一项基本任务,被称为分布式最大共识问题。尽管分布式最大共识问题非常重要,但文献中对其隐私保护的关注却很有限。传统的隐私保护方法通常会给更新增加噪音,从而降低最终结果的准确性。为了克服这些局限性,我们提出了一种新颖的基于分布式优化的方法,它能在不牺牲准确性的前提下保护隐私。通过全面的信息理论分析,我们得出了保护隐私数据免受被动和窃听对手攻击的充分条件。广泛的实验验证了我们方法的有效性,证明它不仅能保护完美的隐私,还能保持准确性,优于现有的基于噪声的方法,后者通常会造成准确性损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信