Glenohumeral Joint Volume Measurement in Patients with Shoulder Instability: A 3D Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Arthrographic Study

Q4 Medicine
Medicina Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.3390/medicina60091508
Derya Güçlü, Elif Nisa Ünlü, Mehmet Arıcan, Oğuzhan Acar, Veysel Uludağ, Hayri Oğul
{"title":"Glenohumeral Joint Volume Measurement in Patients with Shoulder Instability: A 3D Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Arthrographic Study","authors":"Derya Güçlü, Elif Nisa Ünlü, Mehmet Arıcan, Oğuzhan Acar, Veysel Uludağ, Hayri Oğul","doi":"10.3390/medicina60091508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: This study aimed to compare capsular volume in patients with shoulder instability to that in control subjects without instability using magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography. The objective was to develop a reliable screening method with which to assess shoulder volume. Materials and Methods: In 21 patients with atraumatic shoulder instability and 21 controls, thin-slice 3D volumetric MR arthrography sequences were obtained. MR arthrography images were uploaded to 3D reconstruction, and 3D images were generated. From the 3D reconstructed images, volumetric measurements of rotator interval (RI), anterior and posterior capsular (AC, PC) recesses, biceps tendon sheath (BS), axillary recess (AR), and total glenohumeral joint (TGJ) were performed. Individuals with any extra-articular contrast leakage were also recorded. Results: A retrospective study analyzed a patient group of 21 individuals with shoulder instability (mean age 29.52 ± 12.83 years) and a control group of 21 individuals without instability (mean age 35.71 ± 12.77 years). No statistically significant differences were identified between the groups with regard to age, gender, or side distribution. The mean total joint volume was significantly higher in the instability group (29.85 ± 6.40 cm3) compared to the control group (23.15 ± 3.48 cm3, p = 0.0001). Additionally, the mean volumes of the RI, AC, PC, BS, and AR were all significantly greater in the patient group compared to the control group. Conclusions: 3D volumetric MR arthrographic measurements of the shoulder joint capacity can provide valuable insights for clinical follow-up and guide surgical treatment decisions in cases of atraumatic shoulder instability.","PeriodicalId":18512,"journal":{"name":"Medicina","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60091508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to compare capsular volume in patients with shoulder instability to that in control subjects without instability using magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography. The objective was to develop a reliable screening method with which to assess shoulder volume. Materials and Methods: In 21 patients with atraumatic shoulder instability and 21 controls, thin-slice 3D volumetric MR arthrography sequences were obtained. MR arthrography images were uploaded to 3D reconstruction, and 3D images were generated. From the 3D reconstructed images, volumetric measurements of rotator interval (RI), anterior and posterior capsular (AC, PC) recesses, biceps tendon sheath (BS), axillary recess (AR), and total glenohumeral joint (TGJ) were performed. Individuals with any extra-articular contrast leakage were also recorded. Results: A retrospective study analyzed a patient group of 21 individuals with shoulder instability (mean age 29.52 ± 12.83 years) and a control group of 21 individuals without instability (mean age 35.71 ± 12.77 years). No statistically significant differences were identified between the groups with regard to age, gender, or side distribution. The mean total joint volume was significantly higher in the instability group (29.85 ± 6.40 cm3) compared to the control group (23.15 ± 3.48 cm3, p = 0.0001). Additionally, the mean volumes of the RI, AC, PC, BS, and AR were all significantly greater in the patient group compared to the control group. Conclusions: 3D volumetric MR arthrographic measurements of the shoulder joint capacity can provide valuable insights for clinical follow-up and guide surgical treatment decisions in cases of atraumatic shoulder instability.
肩关节失稳患者的盂肱关节容积测量:三维容积磁共振关节造影研究
背景和目的:本研究旨在利用磁共振(MR)关节造影术比较肩关节不稳定患者与无不稳定性的对照受试者的关节囊容量。目的是开发一种可靠的筛查方法,用于评估肩关节体积。材料和方法:在 21 名肩关节非创伤性不稳定患者和 21 名对照组患者中获取薄片三维容积磁共振关节造影序列。将磁共振关节造影图像上传到三维重建系统,生成三维图像。根据三维重建图像,对旋转肌间隙(RI)、前后关节囊(AC、PC)凹陷、肱二头肌腱鞘(BS)、腋窝凹陷(AR)和整个盂肱关节(TGJ)进行容积测量。此外,还记录了关节外造影剂渗漏的情况。结果一项回顾性研究分析了 21 名肩关节不稳定患者(平均年龄为 29.52 ± 12.83 岁)和 21 名无肩关节不稳定的对照组患者(平均年龄为 35.71 ± 12.77 岁)。两组患者在年龄、性别或患侧分布方面均无明显统计学差异。与对照组(23.15 ± 3.48 cm3,P = 0.0001)相比,不稳定组的平均关节总体积(29.85 ± 6.40 cm3)明显更高。此外,与对照组相比,患者组的 RI、AC、PC、BS 和 AR 的平均体积均明显增大。结论肩关节容量的三维容积磁共振关节造影测量可为临床随访提供有价值的见解,并指导非创伤性肩关节不稳定病例的手术治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicina
Medicina Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Publicada con el apoyo del Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva. Medicina no tiene propósitos comerciales. El objeto de su creación ha sido propender al adelanto de la medicina argentina. Los beneficios que pudieran obtenerse serán aplicados exclusivamente a ese fin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信