Na Wang, Jun Liu, Bao Chai, Jianhong Yao, Xufang Du, Qi Mei, Xuena Wang
{"title":"Bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis investigates causal associations between cathepsins and inflammatory bowel disease","authors":"Na Wang, Jun Liu, Bao Chai, Jianhong Yao, Xufang Du, Qi Mei, Xuena Wang","doi":"10.3389/fgene.2024.1436407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundCathepsins, key regulators of the pathology of gastrointestinal disorders such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), are a target protease that has attracted much attention in recent years. IBD is a chronic and relapsing inflammatory disorder of the gut. Traditional studies have shown a correlation between cathepsin and the risk of IBD, while the causal relationship remains unclear.MethodsThis study utilized Mendelian randomization techniques to evaluate the causal relationships between eleven cathepsins and the subtypes of IBD, such as ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). We also performed a series of sensitivity analyses to validate the primary Mendelian randomization (MR) results, including Cochran’s Q test, the MR-PRESSO global test, and the MR pleiotropy test.ResultsThe forward MR analyses showed no significant association between cathepsins and IBD. Reverse Mendelian randomization analyses suggested that UC might lead to elevated cathepsin G levels [inverse-variance weighted (IVW): <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.038, b = 9.966], and CD might cause a decrease in cathepsin B levels [IVW: <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.002, b = −10.525] and cathepsin L1 levels [IVW: <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.045, b = −4.742].ConclusionsOur findings offer novel and comprehensive evidence on the impact of UC or CD on cathepsins, potentially providing valuable insights into the treatment and prognosis of IBD.","PeriodicalId":12750,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Genetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2024.1436407","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundCathepsins, key regulators of the pathology of gastrointestinal disorders such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), are a target protease that has attracted much attention in recent years. IBD is a chronic and relapsing inflammatory disorder of the gut. Traditional studies have shown a correlation between cathepsin and the risk of IBD, while the causal relationship remains unclear.MethodsThis study utilized Mendelian randomization techniques to evaluate the causal relationships between eleven cathepsins and the subtypes of IBD, such as ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). We also performed a series of sensitivity analyses to validate the primary Mendelian randomization (MR) results, including Cochran’s Q test, the MR-PRESSO global test, and the MR pleiotropy test.ResultsThe forward MR analyses showed no significant association between cathepsins and IBD. Reverse Mendelian randomization analyses suggested that UC might lead to elevated cathepsin G levels [inverse-variance weighted (IVW): p = 0.038, b = 9.966], and CD might cause a decrease in cathepsin B levels [IVW: p = 0.002, b = −10.525] and cathepsin L1 levels [IVW: p = 0.045, b = −4.742].ConclusionsOur findings offer novel and comprehensive evidence on the impact of UC or CD on cathepsins, potentially providing valuable insights into the treatment and prognosis of IBD.
Frontiers in GeneticsBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
3491
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Genetics publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research on genes and genomes relating to all the domains of life, from humans to plants to livestock and other model organisms. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of the world’s leading experts, this multidisciplinary, open-access journal is at the forefront of communicating cutting-edge research to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public.
The study of inheritance and the impact of the genome on various biological processes is well documented. However, the majority of discoveries are still to come. A new era is seeing major developments in the function and variability of the genome, the use of genetic and genomic tools and the analysis of the genetic basis of various biological phenomena.