Pretransplant cardiac stress testing and transplant wait time in kidney transplantation candidates

Abstract

Objective Routine screening for cardiovascular disease before kidney transplantation remains controversial. This study aims to compare cardiac testing rates in patients with end-stage renal disease, referred and not referred for transplantation, and assess the impact of testing on transplant wait times. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of 22 687 end-stage renal disease patients from 2011 to 2022, within an integrated health system. Cardiac testing patterns, and the association between cardiac testing and transplant wait times and post-transplant mortality were evaluated. Results Of 22 687 patients (median age 66 years, 41.1% female), 6.9% received kidney transplants, and 21.0% underwent evaluation. Compared with dialysis patients, transplant patients had a 5.6 times higher rate of stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging with single-photon emission (rate ratio (RR) 5.64, 95% CI 5.37 to 5.92), a 6.5 times higher rate of stress echocardiogram (RR 6.51, 95% CI 5.65 to 7.51) and 16% higher cardiac catheterisation (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.27). In contrast, revascularisation rates were significantly lower in transplant patients (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.58). Transplant wait times were longer for patients who underwent stress testing (median 474 days with no testing vs 1053 days with testing) and revascularisation (1796 days for percutaneous intervention and 2164 days for coronary artery bypass surgery). No significant association was observed with 1-year post-transplant mortality (adjusted OR 1.99, 95% CI 0.46 to 8.56). Conclusions This study found a higher rate of cardiac testing in dialysis patients evaluated for kidney transplants. Cardiac testing was associated with longer transplant wait time, but no association was observed between testing and post-transplant mortality. Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to their being the property of Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, but are available to interested collaborators in the context of a formal collaboration approved by the Kaiser Permanente Southern California Institutional Review Board for the Protection of Human Subjects.