Combining in situ and ex situ plankton image data to reconstruct zooplankton (>1 mm) volume and mass distribution in the global ocean

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
Yawouvi Dodji Soviadan, Mathilde Dugenne, Laetitia Drago, Tristan Biard, Emilia Trudnowska, Fabien Lombard, Jean-Baptiste Romagnan, Jean-Louis Jamet, Rainer Kiko, Gabriel Gorsky, Lars Stemmann
{"title":"Combining in situ and ex situ plankton image data to reconstruct zooplankton (>1 mm) volume and mass distribution in the global ocean","authors":"Yawouvi Dodji Soviadan, Mathilde Dugenne, Laetitia Drago, Tristan Biard, Emilia Trudnowska, Fabien Lombard, Jean-Baptiste Romagnan, Jean-Louis Jamet, Rainer Kiko, Gabriel Gorsky, Lars Stemmann","doi":"10.1093/plankt/fbae046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Plankton size spectra are important indicators of the ecosystem state, yet such measurements are typically biased by the available sampling methods. Here, we combined individual size measurement from two zooplankton imaging approaches—in situ observation by the Underwater Vision Profiler5 and Multinet-collection supplemented by ex situ imaging via Zooscan—obtained in the global ocean, to calculate zooplankton normalized biovolume size spectra (NBSS) for all organisms larger than 1 mm. The reconstructed NBSS combining both datasets resulted in increased biomass estimates by adding organisms poorly sampled by either of the methods. The optimal values measured by both methods are used to reconstruct the zooplankton biovolume and biomass distributions. The reconstructed slopes appeared steeper and closer to those measured only by the UVP5 (+7.6%) and flatter than those obtained only from the Multinet (−20%), particularly in tropical and temperate latitudes. The main difference in tropical and temperate NBSS from the two devices is due to the fragile rhizarians that were not accounted for when using net data. When possible, we suggest using in situ and ex situ technologies together, and we provide potential indications on how to correct for missing components of the community when only one method is available.","PeriodicalId":16800,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plankton Research","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plankton Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbae046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plankton size spectra are important indicators of the ecosystem state, yet such measurements are typically biased by the available sampling methods. Here, we combined individual size measurement from two zooplankton imaging approaches—in situ observation by the Underwater Vision Profiler5 and Multinet-collection supplemented by ex situ imaging via Zooscan—obtained in the global ocean, to calculate zooplankton normalized biovolume size spectra (NBSS) for all organisms larger than 1 mm. The reconstructed NBSS combining both datasets resulted in increased biomass estimates by adding organisms poorly sampled by either of the methods. The optimal values measured by both methods are used to reconstruct the zooplankton biovolume and biomass distributions. The reconstructed slopes appeared steeper and closer to those measured only by the UVP5 (+7.6%) and flatter than those obtained only from the Multinet (−20%), particularly in tropical and temperate latitudes. The main difference in tropical and temperate NBSS from the two devices is due to the fragile rhizarians that were not accounted for when using net data. When possible, we suggest using in situ and ex situ technologies together, and we provide potential indications on how to correct for missing components of the community when only one method is available.
结合原位和非原位浮游生物图像数据重建全球海洋浮游动物(>1 毫米)的体积和质量分布
浮游动物的大小光谱是生态系统状态的重要指标,但此类测量通常会受到现有取样方法的影响。在这里,我们结合了两种浮游动物成像方法的个体大小测量,即通过水下视觉剖面仪(Underwater Vision Profiler)5 进行原位观测,以及通过 Zooscan 进行多网采集并辅以原位成像(ex situ imaging via Zooscan),获得全球海洋中所有大于 1 毫米的浮游动物的归一化生物体积大小谱(NBSS)。结合这两种数据集重建的 NBSS 增加了这两种方法中任何一种方法采样不足的生物,从而提高了生物量估计值。两种方法测得的最佳值用于重建浮游动物的生物体积和生物量分布。重建的斜率似乎更陡峭,更接近仅由 UVP5 测得的斜率(+7.6%),比仅由 Multinet 测得的斜率(-20%)更平坦,特别是在热带和温带纬度。两种设备在热带和温带 NBSS 上的主要差异是由于使用网状数据时没有考虑到脆弱的根瘤菌。在可能的情况下,我们建议同时使用原位和非原位技术,并就如何在只有一种方法可用时纠正群落中缺失的成分提供了可能的指示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Plankton Research
Journal of Plankton Research 生物-海洋学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
65
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Plankton Research publishes innovative papers that significantly advance the field of plankton research, and in particular, our understanding of plankton dynamics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信