The Challenging History of Other Earths

Christopher M. Graney
{"title":"The Challenging History of Other Earths","authors":"Christopher M. Graney","doi":"arxiv-2409.11349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides an overview of recent historical research regarding\nscientifically-informed challenges to the idea that the stars are other suns\norbited by other inhabited earths -- an idea that came to be known as \"the\nPlurality of Worlds\". Johannes Kepler in the seventeenth century, Jacques\nCassini in the eighteenth, and William Whewell in the nineteenth each argued\nagainst \"pluralism\" based on what in their respective times was solid science.\nNevertheless, pluralism remained popular despite these and other scientific\nchallenges. This history will be of interest to the astronomical community so\nthat it is better positioned to avoid difficulties should the historical\ntrajectory of pluralism continue, especially as it persists in the popular\nimagination.","PeriodicalId":501042,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of recent historical research regarding scientifically-informed challenges to the idea that the stars are other suns orbited by other inhabited earths -- an idea that came to be known as "the Plurality of Worlds". Johannes Kepler in the seventeenth century, Jacques Cassini in the eighteenth, and William Whewell in the nineteenth each argued against "pluralism" based on what in their respective times was solid science. Nevertheless, pluralism remained popular despite these and other scientific challenges. This history will be of interest to the astronomical community so that it is better positioned to avoid difficulties should the historical trajectory of pluralism continue, especially as it persists in the popular imagination.
其他地球的挑战性历史
本文概述了最近的历史研究,这些研究针对的是有科学依据的观点,即恒星是被其他有人居住的地球所吸附的其他太阳--这种观点后来被称为 "世界的多元性"。十七世纪的约翰内斯-开普勒、十八世纪的雅克-卡西尼和十九世纪的威廉-惠威尔分别根据他们各自时代的可靠科学来反对 "多元论"。这段历史对天文学界很有意义,因为如果多元论的历史轨迹继续下去,尤其是在大众的想象中继续存在,天文学界就能更好地避免困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信