{"title":"The Challenging History of Other Earths","authors":"Christopher M. Graney","doi":"arxiv-2409.11349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides an overview of recent historical research regarding\nscientifically-informed challenges to the idea that the stars are other suns\norbited by other inhabited earths -- an idea that came to be known as \"the\nPlurality of Worlds\". Johannes Kepler in the seventeenth century, Jacques\nCassini in the eighteenth, and William Whewell in the nineteenth each argued\nagainst \"pluralism\" based on what in their respective times was solid science.\nNevertheless, pluralism remained popular despite these and other scientific\nchallenges. This history will be of interest to the astronomical community so\nthat it is better positioned to avoid difficulties should the historical\ntrajectory of pluralism continue, especially as it persists in the popular\nimagination.","PeriodicalId":501042,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of recent historical research regarding
scientifically-informed challenges to the idea that the stars are other suns
orbited by other inhabited earths -- an idea that came to be known as "the
Plurality of Worlds". Johannes Kepler in the seventeenth century, Jacques
Cassini in the eighteenth, and William Whewell in the nineteenth each argued
against "pluralism" based on what in their respective times was solid science.
Nevertheless, pluralism remained popular despite these and other scientific
challenges. This history will be of interest to the astronomical community so
that it is better positioned to avoid difficulties should the historical
trajectory of pluralism continue, especially as it persists in the popular
imagination.