Individual participant data meta-analysis to examine linear or non-linear treatment-covariate interactions at multiple time-points for a continuous outcome

IF 5 2区 生物学 Q1 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Miriam Hattle, Joie Ensor, Katie Scandrett, Marienke van Middelkoop, Danielle A. van der Windt, Melanie A. Holden, Richard D. Riley
{"title":"Individual participant data meta-analysis to examine linear or non-linear treatment-covariate interactions at multiple time-points for a continuous outcome","authors":"Miriam Hattle,&nbsp;Joie Ensor,&nbsp;Katie Scandrett,&nbsp;Marienke van Middelkoop,&nbsp;Danielle A. van der Windt,&nbsp;Melanie A. Holden,&nbsp;Richard D. Riley","doi":"10.1002/jrsm.1750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis projects obtain, harmonise, and synthesise original data from multiple studies. Many IPD meta-analyses of randomised trials are initiated to identify treatment effect modifiers at the individual level, thus requiring statistical modelling of interactions between treatment effect and participant-level covariates. Using a two-stage approach, the interaction is estimated in each trial separately and combined in a meta-analysis. In practice, two complications often arise with continuous outcomes: examining non-linear relationships for continuous covariates and dealing with multiple time-points. We propose a two-stage multivariate IPD meta-analysis approach that summarises non-linear treatment-covariate interaction functions at multiple time-points for continuous outcomes. A set-up phase is required to identify a small set of time-points; relevant knot positions for a spline function, at identical locations in each trial; and a common reference group for each covariate. Crucially, the multivariate approach can include participants or trials with missing outcomes at some time-points. In the first stage, restricted cubic spline functions are fitted and their interaction with each discrete time-point is estimated in each trial separately. In the second stage, the parameter estimates defining these multiple interaction functions are jointly synthesised in a multivariate random-effects meta-analysis model accounting for within-trial and across-trial correlation. These meta-analysis estimates define the summary non-linear interactions at each time-point, which can be displayed graphically alongside confidence intervals. The approach is illustrated using an IPD meta-analysis examining effect modifiers for exercise interventions in osteoarthritis, which shows evidence of non-linear relationships and small gains in precision by analysing all time-points jointly.</p>","PeriodicalId":226,"journal":{"name":"Research Synthesis Methods","volume":"15 6","pages":"1001-1016"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jrsm.1750","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Synthesis Methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jrsm.1750","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis projects obtain, harmonise, and synthesise original data from multiple studies. Many IPD meta-analyses of randomised trials are initiated to identify treatment effect modifiers at the individual level, thus requiring statistical modelling of interactions between treatment effect and participant-level covariates. Using a two-stage approach, the interaction is estimated in each trial separately and combined in a meta-analysis. In practice, two complications often arise with continuous outcomes: examining non-linear relationships for continuous covariates and dealing with multiple time-points. We propose a two-stage multivariate IPD meta-analysis approach that summarises non-linear treatment-covariate interaction functions at multiple time-points for continuous outcomes. A set-up phase is required to identify a small set of time-points; relevant knot positions for a spline function, at identical locations in each trial; and a common reference group for each covariate. Crucially, the multivariate approach can include participants or trials with missing outcomes at some time-points. In the first stage, restricted cubic spline functions are fitted and their interaction with each discrete time-point is estimated in each trial separately. In the second stage, the parameter estimates defining these multiple interaction functions are jointly synthesised in a multivariate random-effects meta-analysis model accounting for within-trial and across-trial correlation. These meta-analysis estimates define the summary non-linear interactions at each time-point, which can be displayed graphically alongside confidence intervals. The approach is illustrated using an IPD meta-analysis examining effect modifiers for exercise interventions in osteoarthritis, which shows evidence of non-linear relationships and small gains in precision by analysing all time-points jointly.

Abstract Image

对个人参与者数据进行荟萃分析,以检查连续结果在多个时间点上的线性或非线性治疗-共变因素交互作用
个体参与者数据(IPD)荟萃分析项目从多项研究中获取、协调和综合原始数据。许多随机试验的 IPD 元分析都是为了确定个体水平的治疗效果调节因素,因此需要对治疗效果与参与者水平协变量之间的交互作用进行统计建模。采用两阶段方法,分别对每项试验的交互作用进行估计,并在荟萃分析中进行合并。在实践中,连续性结果往往会出现两种复杂情况:检查连续性协变量的非线性关系和处理多个时间点。我们提出了一种两阶段多变量 IPD 荟萃分析方法,可总结连续性结果在多个时间点的非线性治疗-协变量交互作用函数。需要一个设置阶段来确定一小组时间点;在每个试验的相同位置确定样条函数的相关结点位置;以及为每个协变量确定一个共同的参照组。最重要的是,多变量方法可以包括在某些时间点结果缺失的参与者或试验。在第一阶段,对限制性三次样条函数进行拟合,并在每个试验中分别估计其与每个离散时间点的交互作用。在第二阶段,定义这些多重交互作用函数的参数估算值将在多元随机效应荟萃分析模型中联合合成,并考虑试验内和试验间的相关性。这些荟萃分析估计值定义了每个时间点的非线性交互作用概要,可与置信区间一起以图形方式显示。该方法使用 IPD 元分析对骨关节炎运动干预的效应修饰因子进行了研究,结果显示了非线性关系的证据,并且通过联合分析所有时间点,精度略有提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research Synthesis Methods
Research Synthesis Methods MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGYMULTID-MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Research Synthesis Methods is a reputable, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on the development and dissemination of methods for conducting systematic research synthesis. Our aim is to advance the knowledge and application of research synthesis methods across various disciplines. Our journal provides a platform for the exchange of ideas and knowledge related to designing, conducting, analyzing, interpreting, reporting, and applying research synthesis. While research synthesis is commonly practiced in the health and social sciences, our journal also welcomes contributions from other fields to enrich the methodologies employed in research synthesis across scientific disciplines. By bridging different disciplines, we aim to foster collaboration and cross-fertilization of ideas, ultimately enhancing the quality and effectiveness of research synthesis methods. Whether you are a researcher, practitioner, or stakeholder involved in research synthesis, our journal strives to offer valuable insights and practical guidance for your work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信