How does restoration ecology consider climate change uncertainties in forested ecosystems?

IF 2.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Katie Pita, Sara B. Wickham, Emma L. Davis, Patrick Lauriault, Alexandra Johnson, Nhu Q. Le, Siobhan Mullally, Kyle Schang, Michaela M. A. Smitas‐Kraas, Elizabeth Wittmann, Andrew J. Trant
{"title":"How does restoration ecology consider climate change uncertainties in forested ecosystems?","authors":"Katie Pita, Sara B. Wickham, Emma L. Davis, Patrick Lauriault, Alexandra Johnson, Nhu Q. Le, Siobhan Mullally, Kyle Schang, Michaela M. A. Smitas‐Kraas, Elizabeth Wittmann, Andrew J. Trant","doi":"10.1111/rec.14265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forest restoration is a powerful tool that combats forest loss and mitigates climate change. Our review asks how climate change considerations are integrated into forest restoration. We asked: (1) How many articles about forest restoration practices discuss climate change; (2) has this changed over time; and (3) when climate change is mentioned, how is it considered? We used the framework created by Simonson et al. in 2021, which describes seven unique areas where practitioners can consider climate change impacts in their projects. These areas include adjusting species and location for projected changes to fitness, mitigating risks, and aligning practice with policy. We reviewed the literature through Web of Science and evaluated publications for inclusion of these considerations. We found that the number of publications about forest restoration projects has increased significantly since the early 2000s, exceeding 200 in 2021. The proportion of these including the terms “climate change” or “global warming,” has also increased (35% in 2021). Climate change concepts were only considered in what we defined as an “in‐depth” context in 83 of the 186 publications we reviewed (45%). However, the majority of publications (115 of 186, 61%) did incorporate at least one of the seven considerations, even if they did not satisfy our definition for in‐depth climate change consideration. Several articles discussed other considerations not described by Simonson et al. (2021), leading us to recommend adding an eighth criterion to their framework: consider place‐based communities and Indigenous Knowledge Holders' responses to climate change in forest restoration.","PeriodicalId":54487,"journal":{"name":"Restoration Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restoration Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14265","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forest restoration is a powerful tool that combats forest loss and mitigates climate change. Our review asks how climate change considerations are integrated into forest restoration. We asked: (1) How many articles about forest restoration practices discuss climate change; (2) has this changed over time; and (3) when climate change is mentioned, how is it considered? We used the framework created by Simonson et al. in 2021, which describes seven unique areas where practitioners can consider climate change impacts in their projects. These areas include adjusting species and location for projected changes to fitness, mitigating risks, and aligning practice with policy. We reviewed the literature through Web of Science and evaluated publications for inclusion of these considerations. We found that the number of publications about forest restoration projects has increased significantly since the early 2000s, exceeding 200 in 2021. The proportion of these including the terms “climate change” or “global warming,” has also increased (35% in 2021). Climate change concepts were only considered in what we defined as an “in‐depth” context in 83 of the 186 publications we reviewed (45%). However, the majority of publications (115 of 186, 61%) did incorporate at least one of the seven considerations, even if they did not satisfy our definition for in‐depth climate change consideration. Several articles discussed other considerations not described by Simonson et al. (2021), leading us to recommend adding an eighth criterion to their framework: consider place‐based communities and Indigenous Knowledge Holders' responses to climate change in forest restoration.
恢复生态学如何考虑森林生态系统中气候变化的不确定性?
森林恢复是应对森林丧失和减缓气候变化的有力工具。我们的综述询问气候变化因素是如何被纳入森林恢复的。我们询问:(1) 有多少关于森林恢复实践的文章讨论了气候变化;(2) 随着时间的推移,这种情况是否发生了变化;(3) 当提到气候变化时,是如何考虑的?我们使用了 Simonson 等人在 2021 年创建的框架,该框架描述了从业者在其项目中可以考虑气候变化影响的七个独特领域。这些领域包括根据预测的适应性变化调整物种和地点、降低风险以及使实践与政策保持一致。我们通过 "科学网"(Web of Science)查阅了相关文献,并对包含这些考虑因素的出版物进行了评估。我们发现,自 21 世纪初以来,有关森林恢复项目的出版物数量大幅增加,到 2021 年已超过 200 篇。其中包含 "气候变化 "或 "全球变暖 "字眼的比例也有所增加(2021 年为 35%)。在我们审查的 186 篇出版物中,只有 83 篇(45%)在我们定义为 "深入 "的背景下考虑了气候变化概念。不过,大多数出版物(186 篇中的 115 篇,61%)确实纳入了七个考虑因素中的至少一个,即使它们不符合我们对深入考虑气候变化的定义。有几篇文章讨论了西蒙森等人(2021 年)没有描述的其他考虑因素,因此我们建议在他们的框架中增加第八个标准:考虑基于地方的社区和土著知识持有者在森林恢复中对气候变化的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Restoration Ecology
Restoration Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
15.60%
发文量
226
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Restoration Ecology fosters the exchange of ideas among the many disciplines involved with ecological restoration. Addressing global concerns and communicating them to the international research community and restoration practitioners, the journal is at the forefront of a vital new direction in science, ecology, and policy. Original papers describe experimental, observational, and theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine, and freshwater systems, and are considered without taxonomic bias. Contributions span the natural sciences, including ecological and biological aspects, as well as the restoration of soil, air and water when set in an ecological context; and the social sciences, including cultural, philosophical, political, educational, economic and historical aspects. Edited by a distinguished panel, the journal continues to be a major conduit for researchers to publish their findings in the fight to not only halt ecological damage, but also to ultimately reverse it.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信