Yes, Prime Minister, question order does matter -- and it's certainly not classical! But is it quantum?

Dorje C. Brody
{"title":"Yes, Prime Minister, question order does matter -- and it's certainly not classical! But is it quantum?","authors":"Dorje C. Brody","doi":"arxiv-2409.08930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Response to a poll can be manipulated by means of a series of leading\nquestions. We show that such phenomena cannot be explained by use of classical\nprobability theory, whereas quantum probability theory admits a possibility of\noffering an explanation. Admissible transformation rules in quantum\nprobability, however, do impose some constraints on the modelling of cognitive\nbehaviour, which are highlighted here. Focusing on a recent poll conducted by\nIpsos on a set of questions posed by Sir Humphrey Appleby in an episode of the\nBritish political satire \\textit{Yes, Prime Minister}, we show that the\nresulting data cannot be explained quite so simply using quantum rules,\nalthough it seems not impossible.","PeriodicalId":501517,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Neurons and Cognition","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Neurons and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Response to a poll can be manipulated by means of a series of leading questions. We show that such phenomena cannot be explained by use of classical probability theory, whereas quantum probability theory admits a possibility of offering an explanation. Admissible transformation rules in quantum probability, however, do impose some constraints on the modelling of cognitive behaviour, which are highlighted here. Focusing on a recent poll conducted by Ipsos on a set of questions posed by Sir Humphrey Appleby in an episode of the British political satire \textit{Yes, Prime Minister}, we show that the resulting data cannot be explained quite so simply using quantum rules, although it seems not impossible.
是的,首相,提问顺序确实很重要,而且它肯定不是经典的!但它是量子的吗?
通过一系列引导性问题,可以操纵对民意调查的回应。我们证明,使用经典概率论无法解释这种现象,而量子概率论则有可能提供解释。不过,量子概率论中的可容许变换规则确实对认知行为的建模造成了一些限制,在此重点加以说明。最近,益普索(Ipsos)就英国政治讽刺剧《是的,首相》(textit{Yes, Prime Minister})中汉弗莱-阿普比爵士(Sir Humphrey Appleby)提出的一组问题进行了民意调查,我们以此为重点,说明虽然用量子规则似乎并非不可能,但却无法如此简单地解释得出的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信