On the difference between thermalization in open and isolated quantum systems: a case study

Archak Purkayastha, Giacomo Guarnieri, Janet Anders, Marco Merkli
{"title":"On the difference between thermalization in open and isolated quantum systems: a case study","authors":"Archak Purkayastha, Giacomo Guarnieri, Janet Anders, Marco Merkli","doi":"arxiv-2409.11932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thermalization of isolated and open quantum systems has been studied\nextensively. However, being the subject of investigation by different\nscientific communities and being analysed using different mathematical tools,\nthe connection between the isolated (IQS) and open (OQS) approaches to\nthermalization has remained opaque. Here we demonstrate that the fundamental\ndifference between the two paradigms is the order in which the long time and\nthe thermodynamic limits are taken. This difference implies that they describe\nphysics on widely different time and length scales. Our analysis is carried out\nnumerically for the case of a double quantum dot (DQD) coupled to a fermionic\nlead. We show how both OQS and IQS thermalization can be explored in this model\non equal footing, allowing a fair comparison between the two. We find that\nwhile the quadratically coupled (free) DQD experiences no isolated\nthermalization, it of course does experience open thermalization. For the\nnon-linearly interacting DQD coupled to fermionic lead, we show by\ncharacterizing its spectral form factor and level spacing distribution, that\nthe system falls in the twilight zone between integrable and non-integrable\nregimes, which we call partially non-integrable. We further evidence that,\ndespite being only partially non-integrable and thereby falling outside the\nremit of the standard eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, it nevertheless\nexperiences IQS as well as OQS thermalization.","PeriodicalId":501226,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Quantum Physics","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Quantum Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thermalization of isolated and open quantum systems has been studied extensively. However, being the subject of investigation by different scientific communities and being analysed using different mathematical tools, the connection between the isolated (IQS) and open (OQS) approaches to thermalization has remained opaque. Here we demonstrate that the fundamental difference between the two paradigms is the order in which the long time and the thermodynamic limits are taken. This difference implies that they describe physics on widely different time and length scales. Our analysis is carried out numerically for the case of a double quantum dot (DQD) coupled to a fermionic lead. We show how both OQS and IQS thermalization can be explored in this model on equal footing, allowing a fair comparison between the two. We find that while the quadratically coupled (free) DQD experiences no isolated thermalization, it of course does experience open thermalization. For the non-linearly interacting DQD coupled to fermionic lead, we show by characterizing its spectral form factor and level spacing distribution, that the system falls in the twilight zone between integrable and non-integrable regimes, which we call partially non-integrable. We further evidence that, despite being only partially non-integrable and thereby falling outside the remit of the standard eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, it nevertheless experiences IQS as well as OQS thermalization.
论开放量子系统与孤立量子系统中热化的区别:案例研究
人们对孤立量子系统和开放量子系统的热化进行了广泛的研究。然而,作为不同科学界的研究课题,并使用不同的数学工具进行分析,孤立(IQS)和开放(OQS)热化方法之间的联系仍然不透明。在这里,我们证明了这两种范式的根本区别在于长时和热力学极限的取值顺序。这种差异意味着它们描述的物理学在时间和长度尺度上存在很大差异。我们以与费米子耦合的双量子点(DQD)为例进行了数值分析。我们展示了如何在这个模型中平等地探讨 OQS 和 IQS 热化,从而对两者进行公平的比较。我们发现,虽然二次耦合(自由)DQD 不会经历孤立热化,但它当然会经历开放热化。对于当时与费米子铅耦合的非线性相互作用 DQD,我们通过描述其谱形式因子和级距分布,证明该系统处于可积分和不可积分状态之间的曙光地带,我们称之为部分不可积分。我们进一步证明,尽管该系统只是部分不可整,因而不属于标准特征态热化假说的范围,但它从未经历过 IQS 和 OQS 热化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信