{"title":"A Clinicians Guide to Recommending Common Cholesterol-Lowering Dietary Supplements","authors":"James M. Backes, Daniel E. Hilleman","doi":"10.1007/s40256-024-00681-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The US dietary supplement (DS) market has expanded exponentially since 1994, with an estimated 50,000–80,000 individual products currently available. Many DS claim cholesterol or cardiovascular benefits. Overall, well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with DS are lacking, while studies with favorable results are commonly performed outside of the USA, resulting in inconsistent findings. The expansion of the DS market has limited the ability of the Food and Drug Administration to regulate and prevent substandard products. Eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid are components of DS fish oil. Recent RCTs utilizing prescription fish oil have provided mixed findings and small but significant safety concerns. Hence, the role of DS fish oil is limited and no longer recommended by major cardiovascular guidelines. Concerns have also been observed from RCTs utilizing prescription niacin, resulting in a negligible role for DS niacin in lipid management. Red yeast rice has demonstrated significant low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reductions in studies performed worldwide, including the USA. However, quality concerns and inconsistent study results have been reported on multiple occasions. Other common DS have produced modest reductions in LDL-C and may provide other cardiometabolic benefits, including garlic, phytosterols, psyllium, and berberine. Yet inconsistent study results and quality concerns continue to be reported for most. Nonetheless, there is a need for alternative therapies that can safely and effectively reduce cardiovascular risk. However, until DS routinely match label claims and are free of contaminants, the agents have a limited role in clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"24 6","pages":"719 - 728"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40256-024-00681-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The US dietary supplement (DS) market has expanded exponentially since 1994, with an estimated 50,000–80,000 individual products currently available. Many DS claim cholesterol or cardiovascular benefits. Overall, well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with DS are lacking, while studies with favorable results are commonly performed outside of the USA, resulting in inconsistent findings. The expansion of the DS market has limited the ability of the Food and Drug Administration to regulate and prevent substandard products. Eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid are components of DS fish oil. Recent RCTs utilizing prescription fish oil have provided mixed findings and small but significant safety concerns. Hence, the role of DS fish oil is limited and no longer recommended by major cardiovascular guidelines. Concerns have also been observed from RCTs utilizing prescription niacin, resulting in a negligible role for DS niacin in lipid management. Red yeast rice has demonstrated significant low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reductions in studies performed worldwide, including the USA. However, quality concerns and inconsistent study results have been reported on multiple occasions. Other common DS have produced modest reductions in LDL-C and may provide other cardiometabolic benefits, including garlic, phytosterols, psyllium, and berberine. Yet inconsistent study results and quality concerns continue to be reported for most. Nonetheless, there is a need for alternative therapies that can safely and effectively reduce cardiovascular risk. However, until DS routinely match label claims and are free of contaminants, the agents have a limited role in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Promoting rational therapy within the discipline of cardiology, the American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs covers all aspects of the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, particularly the place in therapy of newer and established agents.
Via a program of reviews and original clinical research articles, the journal addresses major issues relating to treatment of these disorders, including the pharmacology, efficacy and adverse effects of the major classes of drugs; information on newly developed drugs and drug classes; the therapeutic implications of latest research into the aetiology of cardiovascular disorders; and the practical management of specific clinical situations.
The American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.