Evolution of antiplatelet therapy in Japan for the management of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disease: a survey using data from an insurance claims data information service.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Kosuke Miyake,Shuhei Ikeda,Yu Sadachi,Masako Sugimoto,Taketoshi Furugori,Tetsuya Kimura,Yusuke Yakushiji
{"title":"Evolution of antiplatelet therapy in Japan for the management of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disease: a survey using data from an insurance claims data information service.","authors":"Kosuke Miyake,Shuhei Ikeda,Yu Sadachi,Masako Sugimoto,Taketoshi Furugori,Tetsuya Kimura,Yusuke Yakushiji","doi":"10.1080/14656566.2024.2404108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nNon-cardioembolic ischemic stroke (NCIS) and ischemic heart disease (IHD) require secondary prevention with antiplatelet therapy (APT). We investigated APT prescription status for patients with NCIS and IHD.\r\n\r\nRESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS\r\nThis retrospective study utilized claims data from patients with NCIS and those who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for IHD and received antiplatelet drugs. The study included Phases A (2015-2016), B (2017-2018), and C (2019-2020). We evaluated patient characteristics, APT prescription rates (dual [DAPT] and single [SAPT]), and prescriptions by NCIS subtype.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nIn the NCIS cohort, the initial DAPT prescription rate increased over time (Phase A: 14.9%, B: 19.2%, C: 28.0%), but decreased to 6% after 3 months. Subsequently, 25% of patients did not receive APT. For IHD, DAPT duration decreased over time, with 12-month prescription rates of 48.0%, 43.1%, and 32.6% for Phases A, B, and C, respectively. SAPT prescriptions, predominantly aspirin, increased, and use of P2Y12 inhibitors also rose. Few patients (10%) did not receive APT.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nShorter DAPT duration/earlier switching to SAPT for NCIS and IHD have gained acceptance in regional medical care. A higher proportion of NCIS vs IHD patients did not receive APT in the chronic phase.\r\n\r\nTRIAL REGISTRATION\r\nUMIN000052198.","PeriodicalId":12184,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2024.2404108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke (NCIS) and ischemic heart disease (IHD) require secondary prevention with antiplatelet therapy (APT). We investigated APT prescription status for patients with NCIS and IHD. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This retrospective study utilized claims data from patients with NCIS and those who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for IHD and received antiplatelet drugs. The study included Phases A (2015-2016), B (2017-2018), and C (2019-2020). We evaluated patient characteristics, APT prescription rates (dual [DAPT] and single [SAPT]), and prescriptions by NCIS subtype. RESULTS In the NCIS cohort, the initial DAPT prescription rate increased over time (Phase A: 14.9%, B: 19.2%, C: 28.0%), but decreased to 6% after 3 months. Subsequently, 25% of patients did not receive APT. For IHD, DAPT duration decreased over time, with 12-month prescription rates of 48.0%, 43.1%, and 32.6% for Phases A, B, and C, respectively. SAPT prescriptions, predominantly aspirin, increased, and use of P2Y12 inhibitors also rose. Few patients (10%) did not receive APT. CONCLUSIONS Shorter DAPT duration/earlier switching to SAPT for NCIS and IHD have gained acceptance in regional medical care. A higher proportion of NCIS vs IHD patients did not receive APT in the chronic phase. TRIAL REGISTRATION UMIN000052198.
日本用于治疗脑血管和心血管疾病的抗血小板疗法的演变:一项利用保险理赔数据信息服务数据进行的调查。
背景非心肌栓塞性缺血性中风(NCIS)和缺血性心脏病(IHD)需要使用抗血小板疗法(APT)进行二级预防。我们对 NCIS 和 IHD 患者的 APT 处方情况进行了调查。研究设计和方法这项回顾性研究利用了 NCIS 患者和因 IHD 接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并接受抗血小板药物治疗的患者的索赔数据。研究包括 A 阶段(2015-2016 年)、B 阶段(2017-2018 年)和 C 阶段(2019-2020 年)。我们评估了患者特征、APT处方率(双联 [DAPT]和单联 [SAPT])以及按NCIS亚型划分的处方情况。结果在NCIS队列中,初始DAPT处方率随时间推移而增加(A期:14.9%,B期:19.2%,C期:28.0%),但3个月后降至6%。随后,25% 的患者没有接受 APT。对于 IHD 患者,DAPT 持续时间随着时间的推移而缩短,A、B 和 C 阶段的 12 个月处方率分别为 48.0%、43.1% 和 32.6%。SAPT 处方(主要是阿司匹林)有所增加,P2Y12 抑制剂的使用也有所增加。结论NCIS和IHD患者缩短DAPT持续时间/提早改用SAPT已被地区医疗机构接受。NCIS与IHD患者在慢性期未接受APT治疗的比例更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles and original papers on newly approved/near to launch compounds mainly of chemical/synthetic origin, providing expert opinion on the likely impact of these new agents on existing pharmacotherapy of specific diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信